Encyclopedia of Autism Spectrum Disorders

Living Edition
| Editors: Fred R. Volkmar

Self-Other Distinction and Social Cognition in ASD

Living reference work entry

Latest version View entry history

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6435-8_102194-2


Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is characterized by marked impairments in social interactions. One of the most basic elements constituting the ability to interact with other social agents is to form representations of the self and the other while also being able to distinguish these representations. How crucial the ability for self-other distinction is for social interactions becomes obvious in the motor domain. Recent theories have emphasized that perceiving the actions of other agents activates corresponding motor representations in the observer, by means of the mirror neuron system (MNS: Gallese and Goldman 1998). When we see somebody else acting, this activates a motor representation similar to the one that is active when planning and executing the action oneself. Such a common representational basis of observed and executed actions makes it necessary, however, to distinguish these representations. Without self-other distinction, externally triggered motor...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References and Reading

  1. Bardi, L., Gheza, D., & Brass, M. (2017). TPJ-M1 interaction in the control of shared representations: New insights from tDCS and TMS combined. NeuroImage, 146, 734–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brass, M., Bekkering, H., Wohlschläger, A., & Prinz, W. (2000). Compatibility between observed and executed finger movements: Comparing symbolic, spatial, and imitative cues. Brain and Cognition, 44, 124–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brass, M., Derrfuss, J., Matthes-von Cramon, G., & von Cramon, D. Y. (2003). Imitative response tendencies in patients with frontal brain lesions. Neuropsychology, 17(2), 265–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brass, M., Derrfuss, J., & von Cramon, D. Y. (2005). The inhibition of imitative response tendencies: A functional double dissociation of imitative and overlearned responses. Neuropsychologia, 43, 89–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brass, M., Ruby, P., & Spengler, S. (2009). Inhibition of imitative behaviour and social cognition. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 364, 2359–2367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chartrand, T. L., & Bargh, J. A. (1999). The chameleon effect: The perception-behavior link and social interaction. Journal of Persality and Social Psycholology, 76(6), 893–910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. De Coster, L., Wiersema, J. R., Deschrijver, E., & Brass, M. (2018). The effect of being imitated on empathy for pain in adults with high-functioning autism: Disturbed self-other distinction leads to altered empathic responding. Autism, 22(6), 712–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. De Guzman, M., Bird, G., Banissy, M. J., & Catmur, C. (2016). Self-other control processes in social cognition: From imitation to empathy. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 371, 20150079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Deschrijver, E., Wiersema, J. R., & Brass, M. (2017). Action-based touch observation in adults with high functioning autism: Can compromised self-other distinction abilities link social and sensory everyday problems? Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 12(2), 273–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Frith, U., & Happe, F. (1999). Theory of mind and self-consciousness: What it is like to be autistic. Mind and Language, 14, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gallese, V., & Goldman, A. (1998). Mirror neurons and the simulation theory of mind-reading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 493–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Goris, J., Braem, S., Nijhof, A. D., Rigoni, D., Deschrijver, E., Van de Cruys, S., Wiersema, J. R., & Brass, M. (2018). Sensory prediction errors are less modulated by global context in autism spectrum disorder. Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging, 3(8), 667–674.Google Scholar
  13. Hobson, R. P. (1990). On the origins of self and the case of autism. Development and Psychopathology, 2, 163–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kanner, L. (1943). Autistic disturbances of affective contact. Nervous Child, 2, 217–250.Google Scholar
  15. Krall, S. C., Rottschy, C., Oberwelland, E., et al. (2014). The role of the right temporoparietal junction in attention and social interaction as revealed by ALE meta-analysis. Brain Structure and Function, 220, 587–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lhermitte, F., Pillon, B., & Serdaru, M. (1986). Human autonomy and the frontal lobes. Part I: Imitation and utilization behavior: A neuropsychological study of 75 patients. Annals of Neurology, 19(4), 326–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lombardo, M. V., Chakrabarti, B., Bullmore, E. T., & Baron-Cohen, S. (2011). Specialization of right temporo-parietal junction for mentalizing and its relation to social impairments in autism. NeuroImage, 56(3), 1832–1838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Martineau, J., Andersson, F., Barthélémy, C., Cottier, J. P., & Destrieux, C. (2010). Atypical activation of the mirror neuron system during perception of hand motion in autism. Brain Research, 1320, 168–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Nijhof, A. D., Bardi, L., Brass, M., & Wiersema, J. R. (2018). Brain activity for spontaneous and explicit mentalizing in adults with autism spectrum disorder: An fMRI study. NeuroImage, 18, 475–484.Google Scholar
  20. Raymaekers, R., Wiersema, J. R., & Roeyers, H. (2009). EEG study of the mirror neuron system in children with high functioning autism. Brain Research, 1304, 113–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Samson, D., Apperly, I. A., Braithwaite, J. J., Andrews, B. J., & Bodley Scott, S. E. (2010). Seeing it their way: Evidence for rapid and invol- untary computation of what other people see. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 1255–1266.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Santiesteban, I., Banissy, M. J., Catmur, C., & Bird, G. (2012). Enhancing social ability by stimulating right temporoparietal junction. Current Biology, 22, 2274–2277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sowden, S., & Catmur, C. (2015). The role of the right temporoparietal junction in the control of imitation. Cerebral Cortex, 25(4), 1107–1113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sowden, S., & Shah, P. (2014). Self-other control: A candidate mechanism for social cognitive function. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sowden, S., Koehne, S., Catmur, C., Dziobek, I., & Bird, G. (2016). Intact automatic imitation and typical spatial compatibility in autism spectrum disorder: Challenging the broken mirror theory. Autism Research, 9, 292–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Spengler, S., von Cramon, D. Y., & Brass, M. (2009). Control of shared representations relies on key processes involved in mental state attribution. Human Brain Mapping, 30(11), 3704–3718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Spengler, S., Bird, G., & Brass, M. (2010). Hyperimitation of actions is related to reduced understanding of others’ minds in autism spectrum conditions. Biological Psychiatry, 68(12), 1148–1155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Uddin, L. Q. (2011). The self in autism: An emerging view from neuroimaging. Neurocase, 17(3), 201–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Van de Cruys, S., Evers, K., Van der Hallen, R., Van Eylen, L., Boets, B., De-Wit, L., & Wagemans, J. (2014). Precise minds in uncertain worlds: Predictive coding in autism. Psychological Review, 121(4), 649–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Williams, J. H., Whiten, A., Suddendorf, T., & Perrett, D. I. (2001). Imitation, mirror neurons and autism. Neuroscience and Biobehaviour Review, 25, 287–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ghent UniversityGhentBelgium