Robust Control in Gap Metric
Latest version View entry history
Abstract
Robust control needs to start with a model of system uncertainty. What is a good uncertainty model? First it needs to capture the possible system perturbations and uncertainties. Second it needs to be mathematically tractable. The gap metric was introduced by Zames and El-Sakkary for this purpose. Its study climaxed in an award-winning paper by Georgiou and Smith. A modified gap, called the ν-gap, was later discovered by Vinnicombe and was shown to have advantages. When the plant and controller communicate through a non-ideal bidirectional channel, cascaded two-port networks can be utilized to model such a channel whose uncertainties are measured by the \(\mathcal {H}_\infty \) norm. With these descriptions of uncertainties in hand, robust stabilization issues can be nicely addressed.
Keywords
Gap metric H-infinity control ν-gap metric Robust stabilization Uncertain system Networked control system Two-port networkBibliography
- Anderson BDO, Brinsmead TS, De Bruyne F (2002) The Vinnicombe metric for nonlinear operators. IEEE Trans Autom Control 47:1450–1465MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Åström KJ, Murray RM (2008) Feedback fundamentals – control & dynamical systems. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
- Ball JA, Sasane AJ (2012) Extension of the ν-metric. Compl Anal Oper Theory 6:65–89MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bian W, French M (2005) Graph topologies, gap metrics, and robust stability for nonlinear systems. SIAM J Control Optim 44:418–443MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- El-Sakkary AK (1985) The gap metric: robustness of stabilization of feedback systems. IEEE Trans Autom Control 30:240–247MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Feintuch A (1998) Robust control theory in Hilbert space. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Foias C, Georgiou TT, Smith MC (1993) Robust stability of feedback systems: a geometric approach using the gap metric. SIAM J Control Optim 31:1518–1537MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Georgiou TT (1988) On the computation of the gap metric. Syst Control Lett 11:253–257MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Georgiou TT, Smith MC (1990) Optimal robustness in the gap metric. IEEE Trans Autom Control 35:673–687MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Georgiou TT, Smith MC (1992) Robust stabilization in the gap metric: controller design for distributed plants. IEEE Trans Autom Control 37:1133–1143MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Georgiou TT, Smith MC (1997) Robustness analysis of nonlinear feedback systems: an input-output approach. IEEE Trans Autom Control 42:1200–1221MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Glover K, McFarlane DC (1989) Robust stabilization of normalized coprime factor plant descriptions with \(\mathcal {H}_\infty \) bounded uncertainties. IEEE Trans Autom Control 34:821–830Google Scholar
- Halsey KM, Glover K (2005) Analysis and synthesis of nested feedback systems. IEEE Trans Autom Control 50:984–996MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- James MR, Smith MC, Vinnicombe G (2005) Gap metrics, representations and nonlinear robust stability. SIAM J Control Optim 43:1535–1582MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kato T (1976) Perturbation theory for linear operators, 2nd edn. Springer, BerlinzbMATHGoogle Scholar
- Kimura H (1996) Chain-scattering approach to \(\mathcal {H}_\infty \) control. Springer Science & Business Media, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- McFarlane DC, Glover K (1992) A loop shaping design procedure using \(\mathcal {H}_\infty \)-synthesis. IEEE Trans Autom Control 37:759–769MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Qiu L, Davison EJ (1992a) Feedback stability under simultaneous gap metric uncertainties in plant and controller. Syst Control Lett 18:9–22MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Qiu L, Davison EJ (1992b) Pointwise gap metrics on transfer matrices. IEEE Trans Autom Control 37:741–758MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Qiu L, Zhou K (2013) Preclassical tools for postmodern control. IEEE Control Syst Mag 33(4):26–38MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Qiu L, Zhang Y, Li CK (2008) Unitarily invariant metrics on the Grassmann space. SIAM J Matrix Anal 27:501–531zbMATHGoogle Scholar
- Vidyasagar M (1984) The graph metric for unstable plants and robustness estimates for feedback stability. IEEE Trans Autom Control 29:403–418MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Vidyasagar M (1985) Control system synthesis: a factorization approach. MIT, CambridgezbMATHGoogle Scholar
- Vinnicombe G (1993) Frequency domain uncertainty and the graph topology. IEEE Trans Autom Control 38:1371–1383MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Vinnicombe G (2001) Uncertainty and feedback: \(\mathcal {H}_\infty \) loop-shaping and the ν-gap metric. Imperial Collage Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Zames G, El-Sakkary AK (1980) Unstable systems and feedback: the gap metric. In: Proceedings of the 16th Allerton conference, Illinois, pp 380–385Google Scholar
- Zhang Y, Qiu L (2010) From subadditive inequalities of singular values to triangular inequalities of canonical angles. SIAM J Matrix Anal Appl 31:1606–1620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Zhao D, Chen C, Khong SZ, Qiu L (2018) Robust control against uncertainty quartet: a polynomial approach. In: Başar T (ed) Uncertainty in complex networked systems. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 149–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Zhao D, Qiu L, Gu G (2020, to appear) Stabilization of two-port networked systems with simultaneous uncertainties in plant, controller, and communication channels. IEEE Trans Autom Control. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.2019.2918121
- Zhou K, Doyle JC (1998) Essentials of robust control. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle RiverzbMATHGoogle Scholar