Total quality management
- 78 Downloads
INTRODUCTION
During the decade of the 1980s, U.S. corporations recognized the quality achievements of their Japanese counterparts and began to understand the messages being delivered by Deming, Juran and others on the importance of quality. They devised methods for obtaining, understanding and communicating customer needs and requirements within their organizations, developed strategies for improving their engineering design, development, manufacture and delivery processes, and created new corporate cultures that included the formation of self-directed working groups and encouragement of employee participation. Through this focus on quality and the development and adaptation of techniques for achieving customer satisfaction, some of these corporations have demonstrated improvement in achieving high quality, timely deliveries at low costs and ultimately improved their business performance. Many of these firms called this new management and operations philosophy Total Quality Management...
References
- [1]Business Week (1994). “Quality: How to Make it Pay,” August 8, 54–59. Google Scholar
- [2]Cole, R.E. (1992). “The Quality Revolution,” Production and Operations Management, 1, 118–120.Google Scholar
- [3]Covey, S. (1993). “An Inside Out Approach to Change and Quality,” audio tape, Covey Leadership Center, Provo, Utah.Google Scholar
- [4]Crosby, P.B. (1989). “What are Requirements?” Quality Progress, ASQC, August, 47. Google Scholar
- [5]Deming, W.E. (1986). Out of the Crisis, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
- [6]Easton, G.S. (1993). “The 1993 State of U.S. Total Quality Management: A Baldrige Examiner's Perspective,” California Management Review, 35(3), 32–54.Google Scholar
- [7]Garvin, D.A. (1988). Managing Quality, Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
- [8]Gitlow, H., Oppenheim, A., and Oppenheim, R. (1995). Quality Management: Tools and Methods for Improvement, Irwin, Homewood, Illinois.Google Scholar
- [9]Hendricks, K.B. and Singhal, V.R. (1999). “Don't Count TQM Out,” Quality Progress, April, 35–42. Google Scholar
- [10]Jarrell, S.L. and Easton, G.S. (1994). “An Exploratory Empirical Investigation of the Effects of Total Quality Management on Corporate Performance,” The Practice of Quality Management, P. Lederer, ed., Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
- [11]Juran, J.M. (1989). Quality Control Handbook, McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
- [12]Kolesar, P.J. (1994). “What Deming told the Japanese in 1950,” Quality Management Jl., Fall, 9–24. Google Scholar
- [13]NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) (1999). Ten Years of Business Excellence for America, Gaithersburg, Maryland. Google Scholar
- [14]Pignatiello, J.J., Jr. and Ramberg, J.S. (1993). “Process Capability: Engineering and Statistical Issues,” in Statistical Applications in Process Control, J.B. Keats and D.C. Montgomery, eds., Marcel Dekker, New York.Google Scholar
- [15]Ramberg, J.S. (1994). “IITQM: Thought Revolution or Trojan Horse?” OR/MS Today, 21(4), 18–24.Google Scholar
- [16]Scherkenbach, W.W. (1986). The Deming Route to Quality and Productivity: Road Maps and Road-blocks, ASQC Press and Washington CEE Press. Google Scholar
- [17]Scherkenbach, W.W. (1991). Deming's Road to Continual Improvement, SPC Press, Knoxville, Tennessee.Google Scholar
- [18]Scholtes, P.R. and Hacquebord, H. (1988). “Six Strategies for Beginning the Quality Transformation (Part III),” Quality Progress, July, 28–33. Google Scholar
- [19]Scholtes, P.R. (1988). The Team Handbook: How to Use Teams to Improve Quality, Joiner and Associates, Madison, Wisconsin.Google Scholar
- [20]Senge, P. (1990). The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. Doubleday, New York.Google Scholar
- [21]Senge, P. (1993). “Quality Management: Current State of the Practice,” Keynote Speech at the American Quality Congress. Google Scholar
- [22]Smith, G.F. (1998). “Determining the Cause of Quality Problems: Lessons from Diagnostic Disciplines,” Quality Management Jl., 5(2), 24–41.Google Scholar