Abstract
Autoethnography is a branch of ethnography that enables a practitioner to also be a researcher and vice versa. While ethnography is concerned with the descriptive documentation of the sociocultural relationships within a given research environment, the researcher remains an observer of the situation under study. Autoethnography enables the researcher to maximize her (his) personal involvement with the action. The researcher’s lived experience is an integral part of the learning; her engagement with the context, stakeholders, and processes, along with her reflections on that engagement, is paramount to the autoethnographic methodology. Autoethnography is considered to have two clear branches: emotive and analytic. Emotive autoethnography seeks to bring the readers to an empathetic understanding of the writer’s experience. Analytic autoethnography allows for the researcher’s engagement in the situation to be included in the analysis, adding to the theoretical understanding of the social processes under study by making more interpretive use of available data. Analytic autoethnography is, therefore, particularly useful for the design phases of community-based action research in areas such as community development, health promotion, and social work. This chapter will provide an overview of methods involved in autoethnography, with focus on analytic autoethnography as an “action-oriented” method for social science researchers. Advantages and limitations will be discussed and illustrated with lived experience from the authors’ study of complex community interventions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Acosta S, Goltz H, Goodson P. Autoethnography in action research for health education practitioners. Action Res. 2015;13(4):411–31.
Allen-Collinson J. Intention and epochē in tension: autophenomenography, bracketing and a novel approach to researching sporting embodiment. Qual Res Sport Exerc Health. 2011;3(1):48–62.
Anderson L. Analytic autoethnography. J Contemp Ethnogr. 2006;35(4):373–95.
Asselin ME. Insider research: issues to consider when doing qualitative research in your own setting. J Nurses Staff Dev. 2003;19(2):99–103.
Atkinson P. Rescuing autoethnography. J Contemp Ethnogr. 2006;35(4):400–4.
Atkinson PA, Coffey A, Delamont SS. Key themes in qualitative research: continuities and change. Walnut Creek: AltaMira Press; 2003.
Bazeley P, Kemp L. Mosaics, triangles, and DNA: metaphors for integrated analysis in mixed methods research. J Mixed Methods Res. 2012;6(1):55–72.
Bunde-Birouste A. Kicking goals for social change: an autoethnographic study exploring the feasibility of developing a program that harnesses the passion for the World Game to help refugee youth settle into their new country. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of NSW, Sydney; 2013.
Chang H, Ngunjiri FW, Hernandez KC. Collaborative autoethnography. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press; 2013.
Cibangu SK, Hepworth M. The uses of phenomenology and phenomenography: a critical review. Libr Inf Sci Res. 2016;38(2):148–60.
Clarke AE. Situational analyses: grounded theory mapping after the postmodern turn. Symb Interact. 2003;26(4):553–76.
Coffey A. Autobiography. In: Lewis-Beck MS, Bryman A, Liao TF, editors. The SAGE encyclopedia of social science research methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2004.
Corbin Dwyer S, Buckle JL. The space between: on being an insider-outsider in qualitative research. Int J Qual Methods. 2009;8(1):54–63.
Creswell JW. Educational research: planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River: Pearson; 2008.
Denzin N, Lincoln Y. Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1994.
Duncan M. Autoethnography: critical appreciation of an emerging art. Int J Qual Methods. 2004;3(4):28–39.
Ellis C. The ethnographic I: a methodological novel about autoethnography. Walnut Creek: AltaMira Press; 2004.
Ellis CS, Bochner AP. Analyzing analytic autoethnography: an autopsy. J Contemp Ethnogr. 2006;35:429–49.
Ellis C, Adams T, Bochner A. Autoethnography: an overview. Forum: Qual Soc Res. 2010;12(1):10.
Funnell S, Rogers P. Purposeful Program Theory: Effective use of theories of change and logic models. San Fransisco: John Wiley & Sons; 2011.
Green JL, Skukauskaite A, Baker WD. Ethnography as epistemology. In: Arthur J, Waring M, Coe R, Hedges L, editors. Research methods and methodologies in education. 1st ed. Los Angeles: Sage; 2012.
Hasselgren B, Beach D. Phenomenography – a “good-for-nothing brother” of phenomenology? Outline of an analysis. Higher Educ Res Dev. 1997;16(2):191–202.
Kanuha VK. “Being” native versus “going native”: conducting social work research as an insider. Soc Work. 2000;45(5):439–47.
Kemp L, Chavez R, Harris-Roxas B, Burton N. What’s in the box? Issues in evaluating interventions to develop strong and open communities. Community Dev J. 2008;43(4):459–69.
Liamputtong P. Performing qualitative cross-cultural research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010.
Linder C, Marshall D. Reflection and phenomenography: towards theoretical and educational development possibilities. Learn Instr. 2003;13(3):271–84.
Maréchal G. Autoethnography. In: Mills AJ, Durepos G, Wiebe E, editors. Encyclopedia of case study research. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2010.
Pensoneau-Conway SL, Toyosaki S. Automethodology: tracing a home for praxis-oriented ethnography. Int J Qual Methods. 2011;10(4):378–99.
Richardson L. Writing: a method of inquiry. In: Denzin N, Lincoln Y, editors. Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1994. p. 519–29.
Vryan K. Expanding analytic autoethnography and enhancing its potential. J Contemp Ethnogr. 2006;35(4):405–9.
Wall S. An autoethnography on learning about autoethnography. Int J Qual Methods. 2006;5(2):9.
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge support from Adjunct Professor, Dr Patricia Bazeley, Research Support P/L, Translational Research and Social Innovation group Western Sydney University for her guidance, editorial contributions and critical feedback.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this entry
Cite this entry
Bunde-Birouste, A., Byrne, F., Kemp, L. (2019). Autoethnography. In: Liamputtong, P. (eds) Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5251-4_86
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5251-4_86
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-5250-7
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-5251-4
eBook Packages: Social SciencesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences