Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Mind Maps in Qualitative Research

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences

Abstract

Traditionally, qualitative data collection has focused on observation, interviews, and document or artifact review. Building on past work on visual approaches in the social sciences, in this chapter we consider the value(s) of mind maps for qualitative research. Mind maps are useful tools for qualitative researchers because they offer a mean to address researcher bias and ensure data are collected in ways that privilege participant experience. Qualitative researchers can benefit from visually oriented approaches to research by using them to assist them to plan their research, collect qualitative data, analyze what they have collected, and present findings. Of particular interest in this chapter is how mind maps can offer a graphic and participant-centric means to ground data within theory, assist participants to better frame their experience, and can be used as part of the design and development of additional data collection strategies and mixed methodological approaches. While future applications of mind maps are likely to use technological tools and techniques, there is value in the original approach of putting pen to paper and engaging in a creative and tactile process of outlining ideas and recounting experiences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 649.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 849.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Buzan T. Use of your head. London: BBC Books; 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buzan T. Use both sides of your brain. New York: Plume; 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buzan T, Buzan B. The mind map book. London: BBC Books; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassirer E. Language and myth. New York: Harper & Brothers; 1946.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell JW, Plano Clark VL. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Czuchry M, Dansereau D. Node-link mapping as an alternative to traditional writing assignments in undergraduate psychology courses. Teaching of Psychology 1996;23(2):91–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daley B. Concept maps: theory, methodology, and technology. Paper presented at the proceedings of the First International Conference on Concept Mapping, 14–17 Sept 2004, Pamplona; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin NK. The reflexive interview and a performative social science. Qual Res. 2001;1:23–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drucker J. SpecLab: digital aesthetics and speculative computing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2009.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Farrand P, Hussain F, Hennessy E. The efficacy of the mind map study technique. Med Educ. 2002;36(5):426–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feyerbend P. Science in a free society. London: New Left Press; 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelman A. “Information visualization” vs. “Statistical graphics.” 2011. Retrieved from http://andrewgelman.com/2011/07/22/information-visualization-vs-statistical-graphics/.

  • Glaser BG. Basics of grounded theory: emergence vs. forcing. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser BG, Strauss A. Discovery of grounded theory. strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine Press; 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guba E, Lincoln Y. Fourth generation evaluation. Beverly Hills: Sage; 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas J. Communication and the evolution of society. London: Polity Press; 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hathaway AD, Atkinson M. Active interview tactics in research on public deviants: exploring the two-cop personas. Field Methods. 2003;15:161–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoepf MC. Choosing qualitative research: A primer for technology education researchers. J Technol Educ. 1997;9(1):47–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl E. The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology (trans: Carr D). Evanston: Northwestern University Press; 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins A. Mind mapping. Nurs Stand. 2005;20:85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jick TD. Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: triangulation in action. Adm Sci Q. 1979;24(4):602–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson RB, Onwuegbuzie AJ. Mixed methods research: a research paradigm whose time has come. Educ Res. 2004;33(7):14–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jurevičius I. Creation of the state probation service [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Riga: University of Latvia; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelle U. Emergence vs. forcing of empirical data? A crucial problem of grounded theory reconsidered. Forum Qual Soc Res. 2005;6(2):27. [On-line Journal]

    Google Scholar 

  • Kern CS, Bush KL, McCleish JM. Mind-mapped care plans: integrating an innovative educational tool as an alternative to traditional care plans. J Nurs Educ. 2006;45:112–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korzybski A. Science and sanity: an introduction to non-Aristotelian systems and general semantics. Fort Worth: Institute of General Semantics; 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotcherlakota S. Developing scholarly thinking using mind maps in graduate nursing education. Nurse Educ. 2013;38(6):252–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legard R, Keegan J, Ward K. In-depth interviews. In: Ritchie J, Lewis J, editors. Qualitative research practice: a guide for social research students and researchers. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2003. p. 138–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liamputtong P. Qualitative research methods. 4th ed. Melbourne: Oxford University Press; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liamputtong P. The science of words and the science of numbers. In: Liamputtong P, editor. Research methods in health: foundations for evidence-based practice. 3rd ed. Melbourne: Oxford University Press; 2017. p. 3–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lippens R, Hardie-Bick J. Can one paint criminology? J Theor Philos Criminol. 2013;1(1):64–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacBeth D. On reflexivity in qualitative research: Two readings, and a third. Qual Inq. 2001;7(1):35–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGoldrick M, Gerson R, Schellenberger S. Genograms: assessment and Intervention. 2nd ed. New York: Norton; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller A, Johnston M, Bligh D. Mind-mapped care plans: a remarkable alternative to traditional nursing care plans. Nurse Educ. 2001;26(2):75–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nesbit JC, Adescope O. Learning with concept and knowledge maps: a meta-analysis. Rev Educ Res. 2006;76(3):413–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palys T. Research decisions. Toronto: Thompson Canada; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poole D, Davis T. Concept mapping to measure outcomes in a study abroad program. Soc Work Educ. 2006;25(1):61–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pope C, Ziebland S, Mays N. Qualitative research in health care: analysing qualitative data. Br Med J. 2000;320:114–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie J, Lewis J, editors. Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohm R. Positive personality profiles. Atlanta: Personality Insights; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rooda L. Effects of mind mapping on student achievement in a nursing research course. Nurse Educ. 1994;19(6):25–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandelowski M. Real qualitative researchers do not count: the use of numbers in qualitative research. Res Nurs Health. 2001;24(3):230–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serry T, Liamputtong P. The in-depth interviewing method in health. In: Liamputtong P, editor. Research methods in health: foundations for evidence-based practice. 3rd ed. Melbourne: Oxford University Press; 2017. p. 67–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman D. Doing qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephens M. Changing student nurses values, attitudes, and behaviours: a meta ethnography of enrichment activities. J Nurs Care. 2015;5:320–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss A. Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1987.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tattersall C, Watts A, Vernon S. Mind mapping as a tool in qualitative research. Nurs Times. 2007;103(26):32–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomas A. The visual life history interview. 1997. Retrieved 12 July 2009, from http://www.colinwatsonleeds.co.uk/RMarticles/ReadingG.pdf.

  • Umoquit MJ, Tso P, Burchett HED, Dobrow MJ. A multidisciplinary systematic review of the use of diagrams as a means of collecting data from research subjects: application, benefits and recommendations. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011;11(11):1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varga-Atkins T, O’Brien M. From drawings to diagrams: maintaining researcher control during graphic elicitation in qualitative interviews. Int J Res Methods Educ. 2009;32:53–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeldon JP. Mapping knowledge transfer: Latvian-Canadian cooperation and justice reform [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Burnaby: Simon Fraser University; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeldon JP. Mapping mixed methods research: methods, measures, and meaning. J Mixed Methods Res. 2010;4(2):87–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeldon JP. Is a picture worth a thousand words? Using mind maps to facilitate participant recall in qualitative research. Qual Rep. 2011;16(2):509–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeldon JP. After the spring: probation, justice reform, and democratization from the Baltics to Beirut. Den Haag: Eleven International Publishers; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeldon JP, Ahlberg M. Visualizing social science research: maps, methods, and meaning. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2012.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeldon JP, Faubert J. Framing experience: concept maps, mind maps, and data collection in qualitative research. Int J Qual Methods. 2009;8(3):68–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whiting M, Sines D. Mind maps: establishing ‘trustworthiness’ in qualitative research. Nurs Res. 2012;20(1):21–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willig C. Introducing qualitative research in psychology: adventures in theory and method. Buckingham: Open University Press; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, G. (2000). A comparative discussion of the notion of validity in qualitative and quantitative research. The Qualitative Report. 4(3–4). Retrieved from http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR4-3/winter.html.

  • Wolcott HF. Writing up qualitative research. Newbury Park: Sage; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Sociology and Justice Studies, Norwich University, Northfield, VT, USA

    Johannes Wheeldon

  2. Department of Teacher Education, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland

    Mauri Ahlberg

Authors
  1. Johannes Wheeldon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mauri Ahlberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Johannes Wheeldon .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. School of Science and Health, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW, Australia

    Pranee Liamputtong

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Wheeldon, J., Ahlberg, M. (2019). Mind Maps in Qualitative Research. In: Liamputtong, P. (eds) Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5251-4_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation