Abstract
While a long-standing concern in psychology and philosophy, empathy is receiving increased attention in the social sciences for its importance in interpersonal relationships and its use in cross-cultural contexts. I begin this chapter with a brief history and overview of the concept of empathy as a means of understanding the perspectives and experiences of others. I then consider the features that distinguish empathy and the modes through which empathy functions. I address empathy’s value across disciplines and extend the application of empathy to the health and social sciences by outlining how practices of empathy might work as a component of research, especially in consideration of different perspectives and social conditions. I apply practices of empathy to research site and participant selection, communication, collaboration, self-reflection, and the recognition of limitations. I advocate the practice of critical empathy, in which researchers acknowledge the biases and shortcomings of empathy while simultaneously looking to establish shared goals and interests. To conclude this chapter, I consider the continued necessity of empathy as a component of research despite empathy’s limitations.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Appiah KA. Cosmopolitanism: ethics in a world of strangers. New York: W. W. Norton; 2006.
Bloom P. Against empathy: the case for rational compassion. New York: HarperCollins; 2016.
Chen P, Huang C, Yeh S. Impact of a narrative medicine programme on healthcare providers’ empathy scores over time. BMC Med Educ. 2017;17(108):1–8.
Chismar D. Empathy and sympathy: the important difference. J Value Inq. 1988;22:257–66.
Coplan A. Understanding empathy: its features and effects. In: Coplan A, Goldie P, editors. Empathy: philosophical and psychological perspectives. New York: Oxford University Press; 2011. p. 3–18.
de Waal F. The age of empathy: nature’s lessons for a kinder society. New York: Harmony Books; 2009.
DeStigter T. Public displays of affection: political community through critical empathy. Res Teach Engl. 1999;33(3):235–44.
Edwards L. A brief conceptual history of Einfühlung: 18th-century Germany to post-world war II U.S. psychology. Hist Psychol. 2013;16(4):269–81.
Gerdes K, Jackson K, Segal E, Mullins J. Teaching empathy: a framework rooted in social cognitive neuroscience and social justice. J Soc Work Educ. 2011;47(1):109–31.
Gruber D. The neuroscience of rhetoric: identification, mirror neurons, and making the many appear. In: Jack J, editor. Neurorhetorics. New York: Routledge; 2013. p. 35–50.
Hoffman ML. Empathy and moral development: implications for caring and justice. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2000.
Hollan D, Throop CJ. The anthropology of empathy: introduction. In: Hollan D, Throop CJ, editors. The anthropology of empathy: experiencing the lives of others in Pacific societies. New York: Berghahn Books; 2011. p. 1–21.
Iacoboni M. Mirroring people: the science of empathy and how we connect to others. New York: Picador; 2009.
Keen S. Empathy and the novel. New York: Oxford University Press; 2007.
Kulbaga T. Pleasurable pedagogies: reading Lolita in Tehran and the rhetoric of empathy. Coll Engl. 2008;70(5):506–21.
Lepowsky M. The boundaries of personhood, the problem of empathy, and ‘the native’s point of view’ in the Outer Islands. In: Hollan D, Throop CJ, editors. The anthropology of empathy: experiencing the lives of others in Pacific societies. New York: Berghahn Books; 2011. p. 43–65.
Liamputtong P. Researching the vulnerable: a guide to sensitive research methods. London: Sage; 2007.
Liamputtong P. Performing qualitative cross-cultural research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010.
Lynch D. Rhetorics of proximity: empathy in Temple Grandin and Cornel West. Rhetor Soc Q. 1998;28(1):5–23.
Nussbaum M. Upheavals of thought: the intelligence of emotions. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2001.
Ratcliffe K. Rhetorical listening: a trope for interpretive invention and a “code of cross-cultural conduct”. Coll Compos Commun. 1999;51(2):195–224.
Rogers C. On becoming a person: a therapist’s view of psychotherapy. Boston: Houghton Mifflin; 1961.
Shuman A. Other people’s stories: entitlement claims and the critique of empathy. Urbana: University of Illinois Press; 2005.
Vetlesen AJ. Perception, empathy, and judgment: an inquiry into the preconditions of moral performance. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press; 1994.
Vorauer JD, Quesnel M. Don’t bring me down: divergent effects of being the target of empathy versus perspective-taking on minority group members’ perceptions of their group’s social standing. Group Process Intergroup Relat. 2016;19(1):94–109.
Vorauer JD, Quesnel M, St. Germain SL. Reductions in goal-directed cognition as a consequence of being the target of empathy. Personal Soc Psychol Bull. 2016;42(1):130–41.
Zaki J. Empathy: a motivated account. Psychol Bull. 2014;140(6):1608–47.
Zaki J. Moving beyond stereotypes of empathy. Trends Cogn Sci. 2017;21(2):59–60.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this entry
Cite this entry
Leake, E. (2019). Empathy as Research Methodology. In: Liamputtong, P. (eds) Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5251-4_65
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5251-4_65
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-5250-7
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-5251-4
eBook Packages: Social SciencesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences