Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Qualitative Inquiry

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences

Abstract

This chapter discusses the nature of the qualitative inquiry. Qualitative inquiry refers to “a broad approach” that qualitative researchers adopt as a means to examine social circumstances. The inquiry is based on an assumption which posits that people utilize “what they see, hear, and feel” to make sense of social experiences. There are many features that differentiate qualitative inquiry from the quantitative approach. Fundamentally, it is interpretive. The meanings and interpretations of the participants are the essence of qualitative inquiry. Qualitative researchers can be perceived as constructivists who attempt to find answers in the real world. Fundamentally, qualitative researchers look for meanings that people have constructed. Qualitative research is valuable in many ways. It offers researchers to hear silenced voices, to work with marginalized and vulnerable people, to address social justice issues, and to contribute to the person-centered healthcare and the design of clinical trials. The chapter discusses in great depth the distinctive features of the qualitative inquiry. In particular, it includes the inductive nature of qualitative research, methodological frameworks, purposive sampling technique, saturation concept, qualitative data analysis, and the trustworthiness of a qualitative study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 649.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 849.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Avis M. Do we need methodological theory to do qualitative research? Qual Health Res. 2003;13(7):995–1004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babbie E. The practice of social research. 14th ed. Boston: Cengage Learning; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum F. The new public health. 5th ed. Melbourne: Oxford University Press; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker HS. Whose side are we on? Soc Probl. 1967;14(3):239–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger RJ, Lorenz LS. Disability and qualitative research. In: Berger RJ, Lorenz LS, editors. Disability and qualitative inquiry: methods for rethinking an ableist world (Chapter 1). Hoboken: Taylor & Francis; 2016.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury-Jones C, Breckenridge J, Clark MT, Herber OR, Wagstaff C, Taylor J. The state of qualitative research in health and social science literature: a focused mapping review and synthesis. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2017;20(6):627–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3:77–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brinkmann S, Kvale S. InterViews: learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryman A. Social research methods. 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter C, Suto M. Qualitative research for occupational and physical therapists: a practical guide. Oxford: Blackwell; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman H, Unrau YA. Qualitative data analysis – a step-by-step approach. In: Grinnell RM, Unrau YA, editors. Social work research and evaluation: foundations of evidence-based practice. 19th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014. p. 554–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell JW, Poth CN. Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches. 5th ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniels K, Hanefeld J, Marchal B. Social sciences: vital to improving our understanding of health equity, policy and systems. Int J Equity Health. 2017;16:57. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-017-0546-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denzin NK. The new paradigm dialogs and qualitative inquiry. Int J Qual Stud Educ. 2008;21(4):315–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denzin NK. The qualitative manifesto: a call to arms. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin NK. What is critical qualitative inquiry? In: Cannella GS, Perez MS, Pasque PA, editors. Critical qualitative inquiry: foundations and futures. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press; 2015. p. 31–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin NK. Critical qualitative inquiry. Qual Inq. 2017;23(1):8–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denzin NK. The elephant in the living room, or extending the conversation about the politics of evidence. In: Denzin NK, Loncoln YS, editors. The Sage handbook of qualitative research. 5th ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2018. p. 839–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, editors. The Sage handbook of qualitative research. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin NK, Lincoln YS. Introduction: the discipline and practice of qualitative research. In: Denzin NK, Loncoln YS, editors. The Sage handbook of qualitative research. 5th ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2018. p. 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dew K. A health researcher’s guide to qualitative methodologies. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2007;31(5:433–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dimitriadis G. Reading qualitative inquiry through critical pedagogy: some reflections. Int Rev Qualit Res. 2016;9:140–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duggleby W, Williams A. Methodological and epistemological considerations in utilizing qualitative inquiry to develop interventions. Qual Health Res. 2016;26(2):147–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erikson F. A history of qualitative inquiry in social and educational research. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, editors. The Sage handbook of qualitative research. 5th ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2018. p. 36–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fields EL, Bogart LM, Thurston IB, Hu CH, Skeer MR, Safren SA, Mimiaga MJ. Qualitative comparison of barriers to antiretroviral medication adherence among perinatally and behaviorally HIV-infected youth. Qual Health Res. 2017;27(8):1177–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flick U. An introduction to qualitative research. 5th ed. Los Angeles: Sage; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flick U. Triangulation. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, editors. The Sage handbook of qualitative research. 5th ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2018. p. 444–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fontana A, Frey JH. The interview: from structured questions to negotiated text. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, editors. Handbook of qualitative research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2000. p. 645–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaudet S, Robert D. A journey through qualitative research: from design to reporting. London: Sage; 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertz C. The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books; 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gobo G, Marciniak LT. What is ethnography? In: Silverman D, editor. Qualitative research. 4th ed. London: Sage; 2016. p. 103–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green J, Thorogood N. Qualitative methods for health research. 3rd ed. Los Angeles: Sage; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenhalgh T, Annandale E, Ashcroft R, Barlow J, Black N, Bleakly A, … Ziebland S. An open letter to the BMJ editors on qualitative research. Br Med J. 2016;352:i563.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gubrium JF, Holstein JA, Marvasti AB, McKinney KD. Introduction: the complexity of the craft. In: Gubrium JF, Holstein JA, Marvasti AB, McKinney KD, editors. The Sage handbook of interview research: the complexity of the craft, Introduction section. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennink MM, Kaiser BN, Marconi VC. Code saturation versus meaning saturation: how many interviews are enough? Qual Health Res. 2017;27(4):591–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hesse-Biber SN. The practice of qualitative research. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houser J. Nursing research: reading, using, and crating evidence. 3rd ed. Sudbury: Jones & Bartlett Learning; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • King N, Horrocks C. Interviews in qualitative research. London: Sage; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kvale S. Doing interviews. London: Sage; 2007.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Liamputtong P. Researching the vulnerable: a guide to sensitive research methods. London: Sage; 2007.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Liamputtong P. Performing qualitative cross-cultural research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Liamputtong P. Qualitative research methods. 4th ed. Melbourne: Oxford University Press; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liamputtong P. Qualitative research methodology and evidence-based practice in public health. In: Liamputtong P, editor. Public health: local and global perspectives. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press; 2016. p. 169–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liamputtong P. The science of words and the science of numbers. In: Liamputtong P, editor. Research methods in health: foundations for evidence-based practice. 3rd ed. Melbourne: Oxford University Press; 2017. p. 3–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liamputtong P, Serry T. Making sense of qualitative data. In: Liamputtong P, editor. Research methods in health: foundations for evidence-based practice. 3rd ed. Melbourne: Oxford University Press; 2017. p. 421–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liamputtong P, Haritavorn N, Kiatying-Angsulee N. Local discourse on antiretrovirals and the lived experience of women living with HIV/AIDS in Thailand. Qual Health Res. 2015;25(2):253–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park: Sage; 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malterud K, Siersma VD, Guassora AD. Sample size in qualitative interview studies: guided by information power. Qual Health Res. 2016;26(13):1753–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall C, Rossman GB. Designing qualitative research. 6th ed. Thousand Osks: Sage; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maschi T, Youdin R. Social worker as researcher: integrating research with advocacy. Boston: Pearson; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason J. Qualitative researching. 2nd ed. London: Sage; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merriam SB, Tisdell EJ. Qualitative research: a guide to design and implementation. 4th ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mertens D. Transformative research and evaluation. New York: Guildford Press; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills CW. The sociological imagination. Harmondsworth: Penguin; 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minichiello V, Aroni R, Hays T. In-depth interviewing: principles, techniques, analysis. 3rd ed. Frenchs Forest: Pearson Education Australia; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan G. Images of organizations. Beverhill: Sage; 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morse JM. Data are saturated…. Qual Health Res. 2015a;25(5):587–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morse JM. Critical analysis of strategies for determining rigor in qualitative inquiry. Qual Health Res. 2015b;25(9):1212–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morse JM. Reframing rigor in qualitative inquiry. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, editors. The Sage handbook of qualitative research. 5th ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2018. p. 796–817.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morse, J.M., Barrett, M., Mayan, M., Olson, K., & Spiers, J.. Verification strategies for establishing reliability and validity in qualitative research. Int J Qual Methods. 2002;1(2), Article 2. www.ualberta.ca/~iiqm/backissues/1_2Final/pdf/morseetal.pdf.

  • Neuman WL. Social research methods: qualitative and quantitative approaches. 7th ed. Boston: Allyn & Bacon; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly M, Parker N. ‘Unsatisfactory saturation’: a critical exploration of the notion of saturated sample sizes in qualitative research. Qual Res. 2012;13(2):190–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson K, Young RA, Schultz IZ. Handbook of qualitative health research for evidence-based practice. New York: Springer; 2016.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Padgett DK. Qualitative methods in social work research. 2nd ed. Los Angeles: Sage; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton MQ. Qualitative research and evaluation methods. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raines JC. Evaluating qualitative research studies. In: Grinnell RM, Unrau YA, editors. Social work research and evaluation: foundations of evidence-based practice. 9th ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2011. p. 488–503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers AG. When methods matter: qualitative research issues in psychology. In: Brizuela BM, Stewart JP, Carrillo RG, Berger JG, editors. Acts of inquiry in qualitative research. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Educational Review; 2000. p. 51–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossman GB, Rallis SF. Learning in the field: an introduction to qualitative research. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin HJ, Rubin IS. Qualitative interviewing: the art of hearing data. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell J, Berney L, Stanfeld S, Lanz D, Kerry S, Chandola T, Bhui K. The role of qualitative research in adding value to a randomized controlled trial: lessons from a pilot study of a guided e-learning intervention for managers to improve employee wellbeing and reduce sickness absence. Trials. 2016;17:396. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1497-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandelowski M. Using qualitative research. Qual Health Res. 2004;14(10):1366–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sankar A, Golin C, Simoni JM, Luborsky M, Pearson C. How qualitative methods contribute to understanding combination antiretroviral therapy adherence. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2006;43(Supplement 1):S54–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serry T, Liamputtong P. The in-depth interviewing method in health. In: Liamputtong P, editor. Research methods in health: Foundations for evidence-based practice. 3rd ed. Melbourne: Oxford University Press; 2017. p. 67–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman D. Doing qualitative research. 5th ed. London: Sage; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprague C, Scanlon ML, Pantalone DW. Qualitative research methods to advance research on health inequities among previously incarcerated women living with HIV in Alabama. Health Educ Behav. 2017;44(5):716–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor SJ, Bogdan R, DeVault M. Introduction to qualitative research methods: a guidebook and resource. Hoboken: Wiley; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thirsk LM, Clark AM. Using qualitative research for complex interventions: the contributions of hermeneutics. Int J Qual Methods. 2017;16:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917721068.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobin GA, Begley CM. Methodological rigour within a qualitative framework. J Adv Nurs. 2004;48(4):388–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tolley EE. Qualitative methods in public health: a field guide for applied research. Hoboken: Wiley; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torrance H. Experimenting with qualitative inquiry. Qual Inq. 2017;23(1):69–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toye F, Williamson E, Williams MA, Fairbank J, Lamb SE. What value can qualitative research add to quantitative research design?: an example from an Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Trial Feasibility Study. Qual Health Res. 2016;26(13):1838–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White AH. Using samples to provide evidence. In: Schmidt NA, Brown JM, editors. Evidence-based practice for nurses: appraisal and application of research. 3rd ed. Burlington: Jones & Bartlett Learning; 2015. p. 294–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong P, Liamputtong P, Rawson H. Grounded theory in health research. In: Liamputtong P, editor. Research methods in health: foundations for evidence-based practice. 3rd ed. Melbourne: Oxford University Press; 2017. p. 138–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yardley L, Morrison L, Bradbury K, Muller I. The person-based approach to intervention development: application to digital health-related behavior change interventions. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17(1):e30. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4055.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin RK. Qualitative research: from start to finish. 2nd ed. New York: Guildford Press; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Science and Health, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW, Australia

    Pranee Liamputtong

Authors
  1. Pranee Liamputtong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pranee Liamputtong .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. School of Science and Health, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW, Australia

    Pranee Liamputtong

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Liamputtong, P. (2019). Qualitative Inquiry. In: Liamputtong, P. (eds) Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5251-4_53

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation