Abstract
Visual and arts-based methods can be extremely beneficial to research investigating people’s lives, subjectivities, and identities. Well suited to a participatory style of research, these methods work as an excellent support to an open style of interviewing and can help seeing the world from participants’ own perspective, thus providing an insight into their own interpretation of their worlds. This chapter will review the use of two visual methods that I applied in the context of interviews in different research projects: a self-portrait with which I asked for a self-presentation narrative, and a map with which I encouraged participants to reflect on significant relationships in their lives. The use of visual methods as a support to interviewing can facilitate participants to think laterally and be more creative in their answers, and also enable them to take the lead in the interview and establish their own priorities. Simple drawing tasks and other creative arts-based methods can encourage reflection and help covering emotional and sensitive issues that might otherwise remain silent or underexplored. These methods also work well to make participants feel more at ease during an interview. The chapter will provide suggestions on how these methods could best be employed in a research study.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Back L. Live sociology: social research and its futures. Sociol Rev. 2012;60:18–39.
Bagnoli A. Researching identities with multi-method autobiographies. Sociol Res Online. 2004;9(2). http://www.socresonline.org.uk/9/2/bagnoli.html.
Bagnoli A. Beyond the standard interview: the use of graphic elicitation and arts-based methods. Qual Res. 2009;9(5):547–70.
Bagnoli A. Making sense of mixed method narratives: young people’s identities, life-plans and time orientations. In: Heath S, Walker C, editors. Innovations in youth research. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2012. p. 77–100.
Bagnoli A, Clark A. Focus groups with young people: a participatory approach to research planning. J Youth Stud. 2010;13(1):101–19.
Creswell JW. Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE; 2014.
Harper D. Visual sociology. London: Routledge; 2012.
Heath S, Walker C, editors. Innovations in youth research. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan; 2012.
Hesse-Biber SN, Piatelli D. The synergistic practice of theory and method. In: Hesse-Biber SN, editor. Hanbook of feminist research: theory and praxis. London: SAGE; 2010. p. 176–86.
Josselson R. The space between us. Exploring the dimensions of human relationships. London: SAGE; 1996.
Knowles JG, Cole AL, editors. Handbook of the arts in qualitative research: perspectives, methodologies, examples and issues. London: SAGE; 2008.
Law J. After method: mess in social science research. London: Routledge; 2004.
Leavy P. Method meets art: arts-based research practice. London: the Guildford Press; 2009.
Lewins A, Silver C. Using software in qualitative research. A step by step guide. London: SAGE; 2007.
Liamputtong P. Qualitative research methods. 4th ed. Melbourne: Oxford University Press; 2013.
Luttrell W. ‘A camera is a big responsibility’: a lens for analysing children’s visual voices. Vis Stud. 2010;25(3):224–37.
Mason J. Qualitative interviewing: asking, listening, and interpreting. In: May T, editor. Qualitative research in action. London: Sage; 2002a. p. 225–41.
Mason J. Qualitative researching. 2nd ed. London: Sage; 2002b.
Pink S. Doing sensory ethnography. London: Sage; 2009.
Prosser J, Loxley A. Introducing visual methods. ESRC National Centre for Research Methods Review Paper. 2008. http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/420/1/MethodsReviewPaperNCRM%2D010.pdf.
Rose G. Visual methodologies. An introduction to researching with visual materials. 3rd ed. London: Sage; 2012.
Roseneil S. The ambivalences of angel’s “arrangement”: a psychosocial lens on the contemporary condition of personal life. Sociol Rev. 2006;54(4):847–69.
Savage M, Burrows R. The coming crisis of empirical sociology. Sociology. 2007;41(5):885–99.
Wiles R, Prosser J, Bagnoli A, Clark A, Davies K, Holland S, Renold E. Visual ethics: ethical issues in visual research. NCRM Review Paper, NCRM/011. 2008. http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/414/1/Report_on_Reflections_onTCB_Activities.pdf.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this entry
Cite this entry
Bagnoli, A. (2019). Self-portraits and Maps as a Window on Participants’ Worlds. In: Liamputtong, P. (eds) Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5251-4_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5251-4_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-5250-7
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-5251-4
eBook Packages: Social SciencesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences