Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences pp 1653–1674Cite as

An Approach to Conducting Cross-Language Qualitative Research with People from Multiple Language Groups

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:

Abstract

Language expression and comprehension is fundamental for in-depth research interviews, representing both the data and the communication process by which data are generated. A lack of shared preferred language between researcher and participant creates complexity and additional challenges in the research process, particularly when there are participants from multiple language groups. A common solution is to exclude participants on the basis of language preference; yet, there is a need for studies to reflect the diversity of contemporary communities. This chapter introduces a research approach and methods which have been successfully used to conduct in-depth interviews with people from multiple language groups in a constructivist grounded theory study. The approach requires the researcher to be both reflexive and adaptable in their research practice and to develop good relationships with participants and language interpreters. Key strategies are presented for conducting culturally competent and rigorous research in this unique context at modest cost. Adoption of this approach can enable health researchers to take “able to speak English” out of the inclusion criteria of studies and conduct inclusive research with culturally diverse communities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   649.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   849.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adamson J, Donovan JL. Research in black and white. Qual Health Res. 2002;12(6):816–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander C, Edwards R, Temple B, Kanani U, Liu Z, Miah M, Sam A Access to services with interpreters: user views. 2004. Retrieved from York: http://www.jrf.org.uk/publications/using-interpreters-access-services-user-views

  • Asanin J, Wilson K. ‘I spent nine years looking for a doctor’: exploring access to health care among immigrants in Mississauga, Ontario, Canada. Soc Sci Med. 2008;66(6):1271–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryant A, Charmaz K. Grounded theory in historical perspective: an epistemological account. In: Bryant A, Charmaz K, editors. The Sage handbook of grounded theory. London: Sage; 2007. p. 31–57.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bustillos D. Limited English proficiency and disparities in clinical research. J Law Med Ethics. 2009;37(1):28–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charmaz K. Constructing grounded theory: a practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charmaz K. Shifting the grounds. In: Morse JM, Stern PN, Corbin J, Bowers B, Charmaz K, Clarke AE, editors. Developing grounded theory: the new generation. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press; 2009. p. 127–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charmaz K. Constructing grounded theory: a practical guide through qualitative analysis. 2nd ed. London: Sage; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark A, Gilbert A, Rao D, Kerr L. ‘Excuse me, do any of you ladies speak English?’ Perspectives of refugee women living in South Australia: barriers to accessing primary health care and achieving the quality use of medicines. Aust J Prim Health. 2014;20(1):92–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dilworth-Anderson P, Cohen MD. Theorizing across cultures. In: Bengston VL, Gans D, Pulney NM, Silverstein M, editors. Handbook of theories of aging, vol. 2. New York: Springer; 2009. p. 487–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dysart-Gale D. Communication models, professionalization and the work of medical interpreters. Health Commun. 2005;17(1):91–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards R, Temple B, Alexander C. Users’ experiences of interpreters: the critical role of trust. Interpreting. 2005;7(1):77–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellins J, Glasby J. “You don't know what you are saying ‘yes’ and what you are saying ‘no’ to”: hospital experiences of older people from minority ethnic communities. Ageing Soc. 2016;36(1):42–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman S, Radermacher H, Browning C, Bird S, Thomas S. Challenges of recruitment and retention of older people from culturally diverse communities in research. Ageing Soc. 2008;28(4):473–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finlay L. ‘Outing’ the researcher: the provenance, process, and practice of reflexivity. Qual Health Res. 2002;12(4):531–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flores G, Abreu M, Barone CP, Bachur R, Lin H. Errors of medical interpretation and their potential clinical consequences: a comparison of professional versus ad hoc versus no interpreters. Ann Emerg Med. 2012;60(5):545–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franks W, Gawn N, Bowden G. Barriers to access to mental health services for migrant workers, refugees and asylum seekers. J Public Ment Health. 2007;6(1):33–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fryer C, Mackintosh S, Stanley M, Crichton J. Qualitative studies using in-depth interviews with older people from multiple language groups: methodological systematic review. J Adv Nurs. 2011;68(1):22–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fryer CE, Mackintosh SF, Stanley MJ, Crichton J. ‘I understand all the major things’: how older people with limited English proficiency decide their need for a professional interpreter during health care after stroke. Ethn Health. 2013; 18(6):1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrett PW, Dickson HG, Lis Y, Whelan AK, Forero R. What do non-English-speaking patients value in acute care? Cultural competency from the patients’ perspective: a qualitative study. Ethn Health. 2008;13(5):479–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giacomini M. Theory matters in qualitative health research. In: Bourgeault I, Dingwall R, de Vries R, editors. The Sage handbook of qualitative methods in health research. London: Sage; 2010. p. 125–57.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gray B, Hilder J, Donaldson H. Why do we not use trained interpreters for all patients with limited English proficiency? Is there a place for using family members? Aust J Prim Health. 2011;17(3):240–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green DON, Creswell JW, Shope RJ, Clark VLP. Grounded theory and racial/ethnic diversity. In: Bryant A, Charmaz K, editors. The sage handbook of grounded theory. London: Sage; 2007. p. 472–92.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hennink MM. Language and communication in cross-cultural qualitative research. In: Liamputtong P, editor. Cross-cultural research: ethical and methodological perspectives. Dordrecht: Springer; 2008. p. 21–34.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes J. An introduction to sociolinguistics. 2nd ed. Essex: Pearson; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt LM, de Voogd KB. Are good intentions good enough?: informed consent without trained interpreters. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22:598–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irvine F, Roberts G, Bradbury-Jones C. The researcher as insider versus the researcher as outsider: enhancing rigour through language and cultural sensitivity. In: Liamputtong P, editor. Doing cross-cultural research: ethical and methodological perspectives. Dordrecht: Springer; 2008. p. 35–48.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kosny A, MacEachen E, Lifshen M, Smith P. Another person in the room: using interpreters during interviews with immigrant workers. Qual Health Res. 2014;24(6):837–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kripalani S, Bengtzen R, Henderson LE, Jacobson TA. Clinical research in low-literacy populations: using teach-back to assess comprehension of informed consent and privacy information. IRB Ethics Hum Res. 2008;30(2):13–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kvale S, Brinkmann S. Interviews: learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing, vol. 2. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lahman MKE, Rodriguez KL, Moses L, Griffin KM, Mendoza BM, Yacoub W. A rose by any other name is still a rose? Problematizing pseudonyms in research. Qual Inq. 2015;21(5):445–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larkin PJ, Dierckx De Casterlé B, Schotsmans P. Multilingual translation issues in qualitative research: reflections on a metaphorical process. Qual Health Res. 2007;17(4):468–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liamputtong P. Doing research in a cross-cultural context: methodological and ethical challenges. In: Liamputtong P, editor. Doing cross-cultural research: ethical and methodological perspectives. Dordrecht: Springer; 2008. p. 3–20.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Liamputtong P. Performing qualitative cross-cultural research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Liamputtong P. Qualitative research methods. 4th ed. Melbourne: Oxford University Press; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liamputtong P. Qualitative research and evidence-based practice in public health. In: Liamputtong P, editor. Public health: local and global perspectives. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press; 2016. p. 171–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liamputtong P. The science of words and the science of numbers. In: Liamputtong P, editor. Research methods in health: foundations for evidence-based practice. 3rd ed. Melbourne: Oxford University Press; 2017. p. 3–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mabel LSL. Methodological issues in qualitative research with minority ethnic research participants. Res Policy Plann. 2006;24(2):91–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallinson S, Popay J. Describing depression: ethnicity and the use of somatic imagery in accounts of mental distress. Sociol Health Illn. 2007;29(6):857–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall SL, While AE. Interviewing respondents who have English as a second language: challenges encountered and suggestions for other researchers. J Adv Nurs. 1994;19(3):566–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishler EG. Research interviewing: context and narrative. Harvard: Harvard University Press; 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • NHMRC, ARC, AVCC. National statement on ethical conduct in human research. Canberra; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandelowski M, Leeman J. Writing usable qualitative health research findings. Qual Health Res. 2012;22(10):1404–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schenker Y, Pérez-Stable EJ, Nickleach D, Karliner LS. Patterns of interpreter use for hospitalized patients with limited English proficiency. J Gen Intern Med. 2011;26(7):712–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shenton AK. Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Educ Inf. 2004;22:63–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern PN. Glaserian grounded theory. In: Morse JM, editor. Developing grounded theory: the second generation. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press; 2009. p. 55–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sudore RL, Landefeld CS, Williams BA, Barnes DE, Lindquist K, Schillinger D. Use of a modified informed consent process among vulnerable patients: a descriptive study. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21(8):867–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Temple B. Representation across languages: biographical sociology meets translation and interpretation studies. Qual Sociol Rev. 2006;2(1):7–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Temple B, Koterba K. The same but different – researching language and culture in the lives of Polish people in England. Forum Qual Soc Res. 2009;10(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Temple B, Young A. Qualitative research methods and translation dilemmas. Qual Res. 2004;4(2):161–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Twinn S. An exploratory study examining the influence of translation on the validity and reliability of qualitative data in nursing research. J Adv Nurs. 1997;6:418–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van De Weyer RC, Ballinger C, Playford ED. Goal setting in neurological rehabilitation: staff perspectives. Disabil Rehabil. 2010;32(17):1419–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wadensjö C. Interpreting as interaction. London: Longman; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong P, Liamputtong P, Rawson H. Grouded theory in health research. In: Liamputtong P, editor. Research methods in health: foundations for evidence-based practice. 3rd ed. Melbourne: Oxford University Press; 2017. p. 138–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wuest J. Grounded theory: the method. In: Munhall P, editor. Nursing research: a qualitative perspective. Sudbury: Jones and Bartlett; 2007. p. 239–71.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Sansom Institute for Health Research, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia

    Caroline Elizabeth Fryer

Authors
  1. Caroline Elizabeth Fryer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Caroline Elizabeth Fryer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. School of Science and Health, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW, Australia

    Pranee Liamputtong

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Fryer, C.E. (2019). An Approach to Conducting Cross-Language Qualitative Research with People from Multiple Language Groups. In: Liamputtong, P. (eds) Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5251-4_38

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation