Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Blogs in Social Research

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences

Abstract

Blogs are the quintessential early twenty-first century text blurring the boundary between private and public. In this chapter, we approach blogs as contemporary “documents of life” and offer our reflections on what blogs can offer social researchers based on our own research experiences. Blogs offer rich first-person textual accounts of the everyday, but there are practical, methodological, and ethical issues involved in doing blog research. These include sampling, collecting, and analyzing blog data; issues of representation; and authenticity; whether blogs should be considered private or public, and if the people who create them are subjects or authors. The chapter also critically reflects on the methodological and ethical implications of the different decisions we made in our own research projects. We conclude that embracing new confessional technologies like blogs can provide a powerful addition to the qualitative researcher’s toolkit and enable innovative research into the nature of contemporary selves, identities, and relationships.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 649.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 849.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allport G. The use of personal documents in psychological society. New York: Social Science Research Council; 1943.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arioso L. Personal documents on the internet: what’s new and what’s old. J Comp Res Anthropol Sociol. 2010;1(2):23–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Copyright Council. Information sheet: an introduction to copyright in Australia. 2005. Retrieved from: http://www.copyright.org.au/pdf/acc/infosheets/G010.pdf

  • Badger M. Visual blogs. In: Gurak LJ, Antonijevic S, Johnson L, Ratliff C, Reyman J, editors. Into the blogosphere: rhetoric, community, and culture of weblogs. 2004. Retrieved from: http://blog.lib.umn.edu/blogosphere/visual_blogs.html

  • Bassett EH, O’Riordan K. Ethics of internet research: contesting the human subjects research model. Ethics Inf Technol. 2002;4(3):233–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauman Z. Consuming life. Cambridge: Polity Press; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaulieu A, Estalella A. Rethinking research ethics for mediated settings. Inf Commun Soc. 2012;15(1):23–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beer D. Researching a confessional society. Int J Mark Res. 2008;50(5):619–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beer D, Burrows R. Sociology and, of and in Web 2.0: Some initial considerations. Sociol Res Online. 2007;12(5). https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.1560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • British Psychological Society. Ethics guidelines for internet-mediated research. Leicester: British Psychological Society; 2013. Retrieved from: http://www.bps.org.uk/news/guidelines-internet-mediated-research

  • British Sociological Association. The BSA’s draft guidelines and collated resources for digital research. 2016. Retrieved from: http://digitalsoc.wpengine.com/?p=51994

  • Bruckman A. Studying the amateur artist: a perspective on disguising data collected in human subjects research on the internet. Ethics Inf Technol. 2002;4(3):217–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruns A, Stieglitz S. Quantitative approaches to comparing communication patterns on twitter. J Technol Hum Serv. 2012;30(3–4):160–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chase SE. Narrative inquiry: multiple lenses, approaches, voices. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, editors. The Sage handbook of qualitative research. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2003. p. 651–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coomber R. Using the internet for survey research. Sociol Res Online. 1997;2(2). Retrieved from: http://www.socresonline.org.uk/socresonline/2/2/2.html

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danet B. Text as a mask: gender, play and performance in the internet. In: Jones S, editor. Cybersociety 2.0: revisiting computer mediated communication and community. Thousand Oak: Sage; 1998. p. 129–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean J. Blog theory: feedback and capture in the circuits of drive. Cambridge: Polity Press; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillman DA. Mail and internet surveys: the tailored design method (2007 update with new internet, visual, and mixed-mode guide). Hoboken: Wiley; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elgesem D. What is special about the ethical issues in online research? Ethics Inf Technol. 2002;4(3):195–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott H. The use of diaries in sociological research on health experience. Sociol Res Online. 1997;2(2). Retrieved from: http://www.socresonline.org.uk/socresonline/2/2/7.html

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enoch Y, Grossman R. Blogs of Israeli and Danish backpackers to India. Ann Tour Res. 2010;37(2):520–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fielding N, Blank G, Lee RM, editors. The Sage handbook of online research methods. 2nd ed. London: Sage; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankel M, Siang S. Ethical and legal aspects of human subjects research on the internet. American Association for the Advancement of Science workshop report. 1999. Retrieved from: http://www.aaas.org/spp/dspp/srfl/projects/intres.main.htm

  • Gaiser TJ. Online focus groups. In: Fielding NG, Lee RM, Blank G, editors. The Sage handbook of online research methods. London: Sage; 2008. p. 290–306.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Goffman E. The presentation of self in everyday life. Harmondsworth: Penguin; 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman E. Interaction ritual – essays on face-to-face behaviour. Harmondsworth: Penguin; 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman E. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press; 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grinyer A. The ethics of internet usage in health and personal narratives research. Soc Res Update. 2007;49. Retrieved from: http://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU49.html

  • Halavais A. The blogosphere and its problems: web 2.0 undermining civic webspaces. First Monday. 2016;21(6). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v21i6.6788.

  • Heath S, Brooks R, Cleaver E, Ireland E. Researching young people’s lives. London: Sage; 2009.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Herring S. Computer-mediated discourse analysis: an approach to researching online behavior. In: Barab SA, Kling R, Gray JH, editors. Designing for virtual communities in the service of learning. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2004. p. 338–76.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hessler R, Downing L, Beltz C, Pelliccio A, Powell M, Vale W. Qualitative research on adolescent risk using e-mail: a methodological assessment. Qual Sociol. 2003;26(1):111–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hine C, editor. Virtual research methods (four volume set). London: Sage; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hine C. Ethnography for the internet: embedded, embodied and everyday. London: Bloomsbury; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hookway N. Entering the blogosphere: some strategies for using blogs in social research. Qual Res. 2008;8(1):91–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hookway N. The Moral Self: Class, Narcissism and the Problem of Do-It-Yourself Moralities. 2017. The Sociological Review (online before print): http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0038026117699540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huffaker DA, Calvert SL. Gender, identity, and language use in teenage blogs. J Comput-Mediat Commun. 2005;10(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083–6101.2005.tb00238.

  • Hunter A. Monetizing the mommy: mommy blogs and the audience commodity. Inf Commun Soc. 2016;19(9):1306–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James N, Busher H. Online interviewing. London: Sage; 2009.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jones S, editor. Doing internet research: critical issues and methods for examining the net. London: Sage; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • King S. Researching internet communities: proposed ethical guidelines for the reporting of results. Inf Soc. 1996;12(2):119–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kozinets RV. Netnography: doing ethnographic research online. London: Sage; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liamputtong P. Researching the vulnerable: a guide to sensitive research methods. London: Sage; 2007.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Liamputtong P. Qualitative research methods. 4th ed. Melbourne: Oxford University Press; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liamputtong P, Ezzy D. Qualitative research methods: a health focus. Melbourne: Oxford University Press; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln YS, Guba EG. But is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation. New Dir Prog Eval. 1986;30:73–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lomborg S. Researching communicative practice: web archiving in qualitative social media research. J Technol Hum Serv. 2012;30(3–4):219–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lomborg S. Personal internet archives and ethics. Res Ethics. 2013;9(1):20–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lopez LK. The radical act of “mommy blogging”: redefining motherhood through the blogosphere. New Media Soc. 2009;11(5):729–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann C, Stewart F. Internet communication and qualitative research: a handbook for researching online. London: Sage; 2000.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Markham AN. The methods, politics and ethics of representation in online ethnography. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, editors. The Sage handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2005. p. 793–820.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markham AN, Buchanan EA, The AoIR Ethics Working Committee. Ethical decision-making and internet research: recommendations from the AoIR Ethics Working Committee. 2012. Retrieved from: http://aoir.org/reports/ethics2.pdf

  • Marwick A. LiveJournal users: passionate, prolific, and private. LiveJournal research report. 2008. Retrieved from: www.livejournalinc.com/press_releases/20081219.php

  • Murthy D. Digital ethnography. Sociology. 2008;42(5):837–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor H, Madge C. Cyber-mothers: online synchronous interviewing using conferencing software. Sociol Res Online. 2001;5(4). Retrieved from: http://www.socresonline.org.uk/5/4/oconnor.html

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips D, Harding S. The structure of moral values. In: Abrams M, Gerard D, Timms N, editors. Values and Social Change in Britain. London: Macmillan; 1985. p. 93–108.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pinjamaa N, Cheshire C. Blogs in a changing social media environment: perspectives on the future of blogging in Scandinavia. In Twenty-fourth European conference on information systems (ECIS) proceedings, Istanbul, June 2016. 2016. Retrieved from: http://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2016_rp/17

  • Plummer K. Documents of life 2: an invitation to critical humanism. London: Sage; 2001.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rettberg JW. Blogging. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Polity Press; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rettberg JW (forthcoming). Online diaries and blogs. In: Ben-Amos B, Ben-Amos D, editors. The diary. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Pre-print, September 2016. Retrieved from: http://dspace.uib.no/bitstream/handle/1956/12831/Online%20Diaries%20preprint.pdf

  • Riessman CK. Narrative analysis. Newbury Park: Sage; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers R. Digital methods. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2013.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Salmons J. Qualitative online interviews: strategies, design, and skills. 2nd ed. London: Sage; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheidt L, Wright E. Common visual design elements of weblogs. In: Gurak LJ, Antonijevic S, Johnson L, Ratliff C, Reyman J, editors. Into the blogosphere: rhetoric, community, and culture of weblogs. 2004. Retrieved from: http://blog.lib.umn.edu/blogosphere/common_visual.html

  • Scott J. A matter of record, documentary sources in social research. Cambridge: Polity Press; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snee H. Youth research in web 2.0: a case study in blog analysis. In: Health S, Walker C, editors. Innovations in youth research. Baskingstoke: Palgrave; 2012. p. 178–94.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Snee H. Making ethical decisions in an online context: reflections on using blogs to explore narratives of experience. Methodol Innov Online. 2013;8(2):52–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snee H. Framing the Other: Cosmpolitanism and the Representation of Difference in Overseas Gap Year Narratives, The British Journal of Sociology 2013b;64(1):142–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snee H, Hine C, Morey Y, Roberts S, Watson H, editors. Digital methods for social science: an interdisciplinary guide to research innovation. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thelwall M. Introduction to webometrics: quantitative web research for the social sciences. San Rafael: Morgan and Claypool; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson C. A timeline of the history of blogging. New York Magazine. 2006. Retrieved from: http://nymag.com/news/media/15971/

  • Toms EG, Duff W. “I spent 1 ½ hours sifting through one large box…”: diaries as information behaviour of the archives user: lessons learned. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol. 2002;53(4):1232–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Townsend L, Wallace C. Social media research: a guide to ethics. 2016. Retrieved from: http://www.dotrural.ac.uk/socialmediaresearchethics.pdf

  • Turkle S. Life on the screen: identity in the age of the internet. New York: Simon & Schuster; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tussyadiah IP, Fesenmaier DR. Marketing place through first-person stories – an analysis of Pennsylvania roadtripper blog. J Travel Tour Mark. 2008;25(3):299–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UK Intellectual Property Office. Copyright. 2013. Retrieved from: http://www.ipo.gov.uk/types/copy.htm

  • US Copyright Office. Copyright basics. 2000. Retrieved from: http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ1.html#wci

  • Walther JB. Research ethics in internet-enabled research: human subjects issues and methodological myopia. Ethics Inf Technol. 2002;4(3):205–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waskul D, Douglas M. Considering the electronic participant: some polemical observations on the ethics of on-line research. Inf Soc. 1996;12(2):129–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson D, Thelwall M. Researching personal information on the public web: methods and ethics. Soc Sci Comput Rev. 2011;29(4):387–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams M, Hodges N. Are sponsored blog posts a good thing? Exploring the role of authenticity in the fashion blogosphere. In: Kim KK, editor. Celebrating America’s pastimes: baseball, hot dogs, apple pie and marketing? Proceedings of the 2015 academy of marketing science (AMS) annual conference. New York: Springer International Publishing; 2016. p. 157–62.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Tasmania, Launceston, Tasmania, Australia

    Nicholas Hookway

  2. Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK

    Helene Snee

Authors
  1. Nicholas Hookway
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Helene Snee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicholas Hookway .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. School of Science and Health, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW, Australia

    Pranee Liamputtong

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Hookway, N., Snee, H. (2019). Blogs in Social Research. In: Liamputtong, P. (eds) Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5251-4_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation