Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Social Network Research

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences

  • 640 Accesses

Abstract

Analysis of networks is increasingly seen as important for understanding the patterns, processes, and consequences of social relationships in healthcare. Networks can be formal, mandated structures (e.g., a clinical network), can emerge from sharing a common passion, or can be from routine exchanges such as referrals. Braithwaite and colleagues (2009) call for the fostering of naturally emerging networks suggesting these underpin the delivery of healthcare and play an important role in driving quality and safety. Social network analysis (SNA) emphasizes patterns of relationships and interactions between network members (actors) rather than individual attributes/behaviors or abstract social structures. SNA conceptualizes networks as composed of nodes (the actors in the group) and ties (the relationship between the actors). Ties form the structure of the network, and the nodes occupy positions within that structure. This proves a basis to investigate a wide range of issues, including communication pathways between actors (including gaps, bottlenecks, or opportunities to increase connectivity), the presence of “tribes” or silos, key players, networks of social support, and patterns of social influences on behaviors. This also allows researchers to investigate relationships between network structures (e.g., communication flows) and important outcomes (e.g., rapid dissemination of ideas). In this chapter, we will introduce readers to key debates, concepts, methods, and applications of SNA, drawing on the authors’ own studies and the growing body of healthcare literature adopting this approach. This demonstrates the contribution of SNA to understanding different types of networks, including at the individual, group, and organizational level.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 649.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 849.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allen TJ. Communication networks in R & D labs. R & D Manag. 1970;1:14–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ansell C, Reckhow S, Kelly A. How to reform a reform coalition: outreach, agenda expansion, and brokerage in Urban School Reform. Policy Stud J. 2009;37(4):717–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2009.00332.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Apelrouth S, Edles L. Classical and contemporary sociological theory: text and readings. Thousand Oaks: Pine Forge Press; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayyalasomayajula B, Wiebe N, Hemmelgarn BR, Bello A, Manns B, Klarenbach S, Tonelli M. A novel technique to optimize facility locations of new nephrology services for remote areas. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011;6(9):2157–64. https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.01820211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balkundi P, Barsness Z, Michael JH. Unlocking the influence of leadership network structures on team conflict and viability. Small Group Res. 2009;40(3):301–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benham-Hutchins MM, Effken JA. Multiprofessional patterns and methods of communication during patient handoffs. Int J Med Inform. 2010;79(4):252–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bercovitz J, Feldman M. The mechanisms of collaboration in inventive teams: composition, social networks, and geography. Res Policy. 2011;40(1):81–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.09.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop S, Waring J. Discovering healthcare professional-practice networks: the added value of qualitative SNA. Qual Res Organ Manag Int J. 2012;7(3):308–22. https://doi.org/10.1108/17465641211279770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borgatti SP, Everett MG, Johnson JC. Analyzing social networks. Thousand Oaks: SAGE; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgatti SP, Foster PC. The network paradigm in organizational research: a review and typology. J Manag. 2003;29(6):991–1013. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0149-2063_03_00087-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borgatti SP, Mehra A, Brass DJ, Labianca G. Network analysis in the social sciences. Science. 2009;323(5916):892–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borgatti SP. Identifying sets of key players in a social network. Comput Math Organ Theory. 2006;12:21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braithwaite J, Runciman WB, Merry AF. Towards safer, better healthcare: harnessing the natural properties of complex sociotechnical systems. Qual Saf Health Care. 2009;18(1):37–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan M. Nexus: small worlds and the groundbreaking science of networks. New York: WW Norton; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt RS. Bridge decay. Soc Networks. 2002;24(4):333–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burt RS. Brokerage and closure: an introduction to social capital. New York: Oxford University Press; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt RS. Structural holes: the social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler D. Crossing the valley of death. Nature. 2008;453:840–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carmi S, Havlin S, Kirkpatrick S, Shavitt Y, Shir E. A model of Internet topology using k-shell decomposition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2007;104(27):11150–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan B, Reeve E, Matthews S, Carroll P, Long JC, Held F, ⋯ Hilmer SN. Medicine information exchange networks among health care professionals and prescribing in geriatric medicine wards. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2016;83(6):1185–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.13222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y-D, Chen H, King C-C. Social network analysis for contact tracing. In: Castillo-Chavez C, Chen H, Lober WB, Thurmond M, Zeng D, editors. Infectious disease informatics and biosurveillance: research, systems and case studies. Boston: Springer US; 2011. p. 339–58.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Creswick N, Westbrook JI, Braithwaite J. Understanding communication networks in the emergency department. BMC Health Serv Res. 2009;9:247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cross R, Prusak L. The people who make organizations go – or stop. Harv Bus Rev. 2002;80:105–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham FC, Ranmuthugala G, Plumb J, Georgiou A, Westbrook JI, Braithwaite J. Health professional networks as a vector for improving healthcare quality and safety: a systematic review. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012;21(3):239–49. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Currie G, Waring J, Finn R. The limits of knowledge management for UK Public Services modernization: the case of patient safety and service quality. Public Administration. 2008;86(2):363–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim E. Les Règles de la Méthode Sociologique. Paris: Revue philosophique; 1895.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fattore G, Frosini F, Salvatore D, Tozzi V. Social network analysis in primary care: the impact of interactions on prescribing behaviour. Health Policy. 2009;92(2–3):141–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman LC. Network representations. In: Freeman LC, White DR, Romney AK, editors. Research methods in social network analysis. Fairfax, Virginia: George Mason University; 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman LC. The development of social network analysis: a study in the sociology of science. Vancouver: Empirical Press; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller J, Kelly B, Sartore G, Fragar L, Tonna A, Pollard G, Hazell T. Use of social network analysis to describe service links for farmers’ mental health. Aust J Rural Health. 2007;15(2):99–106. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1584.2007.00861.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gifford D, Holloway R, Frankel M, Albright C, Meyerson R, Griggs R, et al. Improving adherence to dementia guidelines through education and opinion leaders. Ann Intern Med. 1999;131:237–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gladwell M. The tipping point: how little thing can make a big difference. New York: Back Bay Books/Little, Brown and Company; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldblatt EM, Lee W-H. From bench to bedside: the growing use of translational research in cancer medicine. Am J Transl Res. 2010;2(1):1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould RV, Fernandez RM. Structures of mediation: a formal approach to brokerage in transaction networks. Sociol Methodol. 1989;19:89–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter M. The strength of weak ties. Am J Sociol. 1973;78:1360–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grimshaw J, Eccles M, Greener J, Maclennan G, Ibbotson T, Kahan J, Sullivan F. Is the involvement of opinion leaders in the implementation of research findings a feasible strategy? Implement Sci. 2006;1:3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haines M, Brown B, Craig J, D’Este C, Elliott E, Klineberg E, . . . Research Group, C. N. Determinants of successful clinical networks: the conceptual framework and study protocol. Implement Sci. 2012;7(1):16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargadon A, Sutton RI. Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. Adm Sci Q. 1997;42(4):716–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heng HKS, McGeorge WD, Loosemore M. Beyond strategy: exploring the brokerage role of facilities manager in hospitals. J Health Organ Manag. 2005;19(1):16–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howse EL. Factors that motivate hospital nurse middle managers to share knowledge related to boundary spanning roles. Ph.D., University of Toronto (Canada). 2005. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=cin20&AN=2009283278&site=ehost-live.

  • Johnson JC, Boster JS, Palinkas LA. Social roles and the evolution of networks in extreme and isolated environments. J Math Sociol. 2003;27(2–3):89–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222500305890.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalish Y. Bridging in social networks: who are the people in structural holes and why are they there? Asian J Soc Psychol. 2008;11(1):53–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khosla N, Marsteller JA, Hsu YJ, Elliott DL. Analysing collaboration among HIV agencies through combining network theory and relational coordination. Soc Sci Med. 2016;150:85–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.12.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kravitz RL, Krackhardt D, Melnikow J, Franz CE, Gilbert WM, Zach A, ⋯ Romano PS. Networked for change? Identifying obstetric opinion leaders and assessing their opinions on caesarean delivery. Soc Sci Med. 2003;57(12):2423–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambright KT, Mischen PA, Laramee CB. Building trust in public and nonprofit networks: personal, dyadic, and third-party influences. Am Rev Public Adm. 2010;40(1):64–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074008329426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin H, He N, Ding Y, Qiu D, Zhu W, Liu X, ⋯ Detels R. Tracing sexual contacts of HIV-infected individuals in a rural prefecture, Eastern China. BMC Public Health. 2012;12(1):533. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-533.

  • Long JC, Cunningham FC, Braithwaite J. Network structure and the role of key players in a translational cancer research network: a study protocol. BMJ Open. 2012;2(3):e001434. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long JC, Cunningham FC, Carswell P, Braithwaite J. Who are the key players in a new translational research network? BMC Health Serv Res. 2013a;13:338. https://doi.org/10.1186/10.1186/1472-6963-13-338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long JC, Cunningham FC, Wiley J, Carswell P, Braithwaite J. Leadership in complex networks: the importance of network position and strategic action in a translational cancer research network. Implement Sci. 2013b;8:122. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-8-122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long LC, Cunningham FC, Braithwaite J. Bridges, brokers and boundary spanners in collaborative networks: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013c;13(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Long JC, Cunningham FC, Carswell P, Braithwaite J. Patterns of collaboration in complex networks: the example of a translational research network. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14(1):225. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-14-225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long JC, Hibbert P, Braithwaite J. Structuring successful collaboration: a longitudinal social network analysis of a translational research network. Implement Sci. 2016;11:19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-016-0381-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long JC, McDermott S. Social Network analysis of a Dementia translational research network. 2017; unpublished data

    Google Scholar 

  • Lower T, Fragar L, Depcynzksi J, Fuller J, Challinor K, Williams W. Social network analysis for farmers’ hearing services in a rural community. Aust J Prim Health. 2010;13(1):47–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luce RD, Perry A. A method of matrix analysis of group structure. Psychometrika. 1949;14(2):95–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meltzer D, Chung J, Khalili P, Marlow E, Arora V, Schumock G, Burt R. Exploring the use of social network methods in designing healthcare quality improvement teams. Soc Sci Med. 2010;71(6):1119–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montoya JM, Solé RV. Small world patterns in food webs. J Theor Biol. 2002;214(3):405–12. https://doi.org/10.1006/jtbi.2001.2460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreno JL, Jennings HH. Who shall survive? A new approach to the problem of human interrelations. Washington, DC: Nervous and Mental Disease Publishing Co; 1934.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Morita S, Oshio KI, Osana Y, Funabashi Y, Oka K, Kawamura K. Geometrical structure of the neuronal network of Caenorhabditis elegans. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 2001;298(3–4):553–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nasiruzzaman A. Complex network framework based comparative study of power grid centrality measures. Int J Electr Comput Eng. 2013;3(4):543.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obstfeld D. Social networks, the tertius iungens orientation, and involvement in innovation. Adm Sci Q. 2005;50:100–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam R. Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. J Democr. 1995;6(1):65–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers E. Diffusion of innovations. 4th ed. New York: Free Press; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan DP, Puri M, Liu BA. Comparing patient and provider perceptions of home- and community-based services: social network analysis as a service integration metric. Home Health Care Serv Q. 2013;32(2):92–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621424.2013.779352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rycroft-Malone J, Wilkinson J, Burton C, Andrews G, Ariss S, Baker R, ⋯ Thompson C. Implementing health research through academic and clinical partnerships: a realistic evaluation of the Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRC). Implement Sci. 2011;6(1):74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz K, Vilquin J-T. Building the translational highway: toward new partnerships between academia and the private sector. Nat Med. 2003;9(5):493–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott J. Social network analysis: a handbook. 2nd ed. London: Sage; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi W, Markoczy L, Dess GG. The role of middle management in the strategy process: group affiliation, structural holes, and tertius iungens. J Manag. 2009;35(6):1453–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309346338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmel G. The sociology of Georg Simmel (trans: Wolff KH). New York: Free Press; 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  • Susskind A, Odom-Reed P, Viccari A. Team leaders and team members in interorganizational networks: an examination of structural holes and performance. Commun Res. 2011;38(5):613–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650210380867.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Travers J, Milgram S. An experimental study of a small world problem. Sociometry. 1969;32(4):425–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tushman ML. Special boundary roles in the innovation process. Adm Sci Q. 1977;22(4):587–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uzzi B. Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: the paradox of embeddedness. Adm Sci Q. 1997;42(1):35–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valente T, Fujimoto K. Bridging: locating critical connectors in a network. Soc Networks. 2010;23:212–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valente T, Pumpuang P. Identifying opinion leaders to promote behavior change. Health Educ Behav. 2007;34(6):881–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198106297855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valente T. Opinion leader interventions in social networks. Br Med J. 2006;333(7578):1082–3. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39042.435984.43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waring JJ. A qualitative study of the intra-hospital variations in incident reporting. International J Quality in Health Care. 2004;16(5):347–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman S, Faust K. Social network analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1994.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman S, Scott J, Carrington PJ. Introduction. In: Carrington PJ, Scott J, Wasserman S, editors. Models and methods in social network analysis. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press; 2005

    Google Scholar 

  • Watts DJ, Strogatz SH. Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature. 1998;393(6684):440–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger E, McDermott R, Snyder WM. Cultivating communities of practice. Boston: Harvard Business School Press; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolf SH. The meaning of translational research and why it matters. JAMA. 2008;299(2):211–3. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2007.26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zerhouni EA. Translational and clinical science: time for a new vision. N Engl J Med. 2005;353(15):1621–3. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsb053723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J, Lin X, Fu G, Sai L, Chen H, Yang J, ⋯ Yuan Z. Mapping the small-world properties of brain networks in deception with functional near-infrared spectroscopy. 2016;6:25297. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep25297.

  • Zheng K, Padman R, Krackhardt D, Johnson MP, Diamond HS. Social networks and physician adoption of electronic health records: insights from an empirical study. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010;17(3):328–36. https://doi.org/10.1136/jamia.2009.000877.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia

    Janet C. Long

  2. Centre for Health Innovation, Leadership and Learning, Nottingham University Business School, Nottingham, UK

    Simon Bishop

Authors
  1. Janet C. Long
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Simon Bishop
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Janet C. Long .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. School of Science and Health, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW, Australia

    Pranee Liamputtong

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Long, J.C., Bishop, S. (2019). Social Network Research. In: Liamputtong, P. (eds) Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5251-4_110

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation