Synonyms
Introduction: Why Diverse Views on the Moral Status of Animals Have Ethical Significance
The fact that people have a range of personal attitudes toward eating is a social fact of little theoretical interest in itself. However, the fact that this diversity of attitudes toward food is often backed up by diverse ethical attitudes is of great theoretical import. This entry focuses on ethical attitudes toward animals as possible food. (Henceforth, by “animals” I refer to nonhuman sentient animals.)
People’s moral attitudes toward food, and in particular animals as food, are usually summarized in a tripartite way: omnivorism, vegetarianism, and veganism. This division is sensible because it tells us the practical outcome of the basic moral commitment: whether a person eats anything, or they eat only animal products but not animals, or they eat neither animals nor animal products. It bears specifying that this...
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Callicott, J. B. (1989). In defense of the land ethic. Essays in environmental philosophy. New York: State University of New York Press.
Cochrane, A. (2012). Animal rights without liberation. New York: Columbia University Press.
Cuneo, T. (2016). Conscientious Omnivorism. In A. Chignell, T. Cuneo, & M. T. Halteman (Eds.), Philosophy comes to dinner. Arguments about the ethics of eating (pp. 21–38). New York/London: Routledge.
Donovan, J. (2006). Feminism and the treatment of animals: From care to dialogue. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 31, 305–328.
Francione, G. L. (2008). Animals as persons. Essays on the abolition of animal exploitation. New York: Columbia University Press.
Herzog, H. (2011). Some we love, some we hate, some we eat. New York: HarperCollins.
Kant, I. (1997). In P. Heath & J. B. Schneewind (Eds.), Lectures on ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Noddings, N. (1984). Caring: A feminine approach to ethics and moral education. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of the Harvard University Press.
Regan, T. (1983). The case for animal rights. London: Routledge/Kegan.
Scruton, R. (2000). Animal rights and wrongs. London: Metro.
Singer, P. (1993). Practical ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Waldau, P., & Patton, K. (Eds.). (2006). A communion of subjects: Animals in religion, science and ethics. New York: Columbia University Press.
Zuolo, F. (2016). What’s the point of self-consciousness? A critique of Singer’s argument against killing (human or non-human) self-conscious animals. Utilitas, 28, 465–487.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature B.V.
About this entry
Cite this entry
Zuolo, F. (2019). Food and the Moral Status of Animals. In: Kaplan, D.M. (eds) Encyclopedia of Food and Agricultural Ethics. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1179-9_606
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1179-9_606
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-024-1178-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-024-1179-9
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities