Skip to main content

Industrial Food Animal Production Ethics

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
  • 68 Accesses

Synonyms

Animal agriculture; Concentrated animal feeding operation (CAFO); Ethics; Factory farming; Philosophy; Public policy

Introduction

Over the past 50 years, animal agriculture in the United States (USA) has transformed from an extensive model characterized by many small family farms to an intensive, industrialized model. This industrial model – sometimes called “Industrial Farm Animal Production” (IFAP) or more colloquially “factory farming” – is characterized by frequent corporate ownership, economic consolidation, and vertical integration; the extreme confinement of large numbers of animals; the use of “technological sanders” such as growth-promoting antibiotics; the use and long-distance transport of remotely grown concentrated feedstuffs, instead of forage or pasture-based feeding; and tight control over the breeding, feeding, and living conditions of animals so as to achieve the greatest production at the lowest cost and in the shortest amount of time (Singer 2002; Singer...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   649.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   799.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Akhtar, A., Greger, M., Ferdowsian, H., & Frank, E. (2009). Health professionals’ roles in animal agriculture, climate change, and human health. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 36(2), 182–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Dietetic Association (ADA). (2009). Position of the American dietetic association: Vegetarian diets. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 109(7), 1266–1282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA). (2005). A comprehensive review of housing for pregnant sows. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 227(10), 1580–1590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA). (2008, August 26). AVMA responds to ‘Prop 2’ [online resource]. https://www.avma.org/News/JAVMANews/Pages/081001a.aspx#avmaprop2. Accessed 22 Oct 2012.

  • American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA). (2009, November). Response to the final report of the Pew commission on industrial farm animal production. https://www.avma.org/Advocacy/National/Other/Pages/Executive-Summary-of-the-AVMA-response-to-the-final-report-of-the-Pew-Commission-on-Industrial-Farm-Animal-Production.aspx. Accessed 22 Oct 2012.

  • Animal Agriculture Alliance. Animal Agriculture: Myths and Facts. (n.d.). In Susan J. Armstrong & Richard G. Botzler (Eds.), The animal ethics reader (pp. 191–198). New York: Routledge, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brei, A. T. (2012, March 11). Rights and nature: Approaching environmental issues by way of human rights. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. Published Online First, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-012-9385-z.

  • Cohen, C. (2001). Defense of the use of animals. In C. Cohen & T. Regan (Eds.), The animal rights debate. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig, W. J. (2009). Health effects of vegan diets. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 89(5), 1627S–1633S.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeGrazia, D. (1996). Taking animals seriously. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • DeGrazia, D. (2009). Moral vegetarianism from a very broad basis. Journal of Moral Philosophy, 6, 143–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donovan, J. (2007). Animal rights and feminist theory. In J. Donovan & C. Adams (Eds.), The feminist care tradition in animal ethics (pp. 58–86). New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foer, J. S. (2009). Eating animals. New York: Little, Brown and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, R. G. (1983). Rights, killing and suffering. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garner, R. (2005). Animal ethics. Malden: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrett, J. R. (2007). Utilitarianism, vegetarianism and human health: A response to the causal impotence objection. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 24(3), 223–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George, K. P. (1994). Use and abuse revisited: Response to Pluhar and Varner. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 7(1), 41–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodland, R., & Anhang, J. (2009). Livestock and climate change. World Watch Magazine, 22(6), 10–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greger, M. (2006). Bird flu: A virus of our own hatching. Herndon: Lantern Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruen, L. (2007). Empathy and vegetarian commitments. In J. Donovan & C. Adams (Eds.), The feminist care tradition in animal ethics (pp. 333–343). New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harman, E. (2011). The moral significance of animal pain and animal death. In T. L. Beauchamp & R. G. Frey (Eds.), The oxford handbook of animal ethics (pp. 726–737). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Human Rights Watch. (2004). Blood, sweat and fear. New York: Human Rights Watch. http://www.hrw.org/reports/2005/01/24/blood-sweat-and-fear-0. Accessed 22 Oct 2012.

  • Humane Methods of Slaughter Act (United States of America). 7 U.S.C. 1901–1907. http://www.animallaw.info/statutes/stusfd7usca1901.htm

  • Humane Society of the United States. (2012). Farm animal statistics: Slaughter totals.http://www.humanesociety.org/news/resources/research/stats_slaughter_totals.html. Accessed 22 Oct 2012.

  • Hyder, J. A., et al. (2009). Adopting a plant-based diet minimally increased food costs in WHEL study. American Journal of Health Behavior, 33(5), 530–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson, D. (2003). Animal liberation is an environmental ethic. In Morality’s progress (pp. 197–212). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leahy, M. P. T. (1993). Against liberation: Putting animals in perspective. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matheny, G. (2003). Least harm: A defense of vegetarianism from Stephen Davis’ omnivorous proposal. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 16, 505–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mellon, M., Benbrook, C., & Benbrook, K. L. (2001). Hogging it: Estimates of antimicrobial abuse in livestock. Rep. Union of Concerned Scientists Publications. http://www.ucsusa.org/food_and_agriculture/our-failing-food-system/industrial-agriculture/hogging-it-estimates-of.html. Accessed 16 Oct 2012.

  • Neumann, G., Noda, T., & Kawaoka, Y. (2009). Emergence and pandemic potential of swine-origin H1N1 influenza virus. Nature, 459, 931–939.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nobis, N. (2004). Carl Cohen's “kind” argument for animal rights and against human rights. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 24, 43–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pimentel, D., & Pimentel, M. (2003). Sustainability of meat-based and plant-based diets and the environment. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 78, 660S–663S.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pluhar, E. (1995). Beyond prejudice. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putting meat on the table: Industrial farm animal production in America. Rep. PEW Charitable Trusts, 29 April 2008. http://www.ncifap.org/reports/. Accessed 16 Oct 2012. Please also see individual committee reports issued to the commission. http://www.ncifap.org/reports/

  • Regan, T. (2001). The case for animal rights. In C. Cohen & T. Regan (Eds.), The animal rights debate. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regan, T. (2004). The case for animal rights. Los Angeles: University of California Press 1st ed. 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rollin, B. (2009). Veterinary ethics and production diseases. Animal Health Research Reviews, 10(2), 125–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowlands, M. (2002). Animals like us. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, P. (1980). Utilitarianism and vegetarianism. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 9(4), 325–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, P. (1993). Practice ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, P. (2002). Animal liberation. New York: HarperCollins 1st ed. 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, P., & Mason, J. (2006). The ethics of what we eat: Why our food choices matter. Emmaus: Rodale Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, W. (2010). A rat is a pig is a dog is a boy: The human cost of the animal rights movement. New York: Encounter Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Food and Agricultural Organization (UN FAO). (2006). Livestock’s long shadow: Environmental issues and options.ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/010/a0701e/a0701e00.pdf. Accessed 16 Oct 2012.

  • United States Government Accountability Office (GAO). (2010, March 4). Report #GAO-10-487T: Humane methods of slaughter act: Weaknesses in USDA enforcement. http://www.gao.gov. Accessed 17 Oct 2012.

  • Varner, G. (1998). Nature’s interests? Interests, animal rights, and environmental ethics. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, P., Rhubart-Berg, P., McKenzie, S., Kelling, K., & Lawrence, R. S. (2005). Public health implications of meat production and consumption. Public Health Nutrition, 8(4), 348–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Samual Garner .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Additional information

Disclaimer: The opinions expressed are the authors’ own. They do not reflect any position or policy of the National Institutes of Health, U.S. Public Health Service, or Department of Health and Human Services

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature B.V.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Garner, S., Rossi, J. (2019). Industrial Food Animal Production Ethics. In: Kaplan, D.M. (eds) Encyclopedia of Food and Agricultural Ethics. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1179-9_200

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics