Skip to main content

Human Capital Policy in Science and Technology

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
  • 91 Accesses

Synonyms

Brain-circulation; Brain-drain; Entrepreneurship; Governance of science and technology; Human capital development strategies; Knowledge creation and exchange; Social development; Transnational research collaborations; Use and application of science and technology

Definition

Human capital is the productive wealth embodied in labor, skills, and knowledge of science and technology. The terminology for policies covering human capital policy varies in countries. They are often called science and technology policy, research and innovation policy, or higher education, science, and innovation policy. Common for all is that they include set of beliefs and practices designed and implemented to stimulate the production of scientific and technological knowledge in order to realize the ideal of progress and welfare in countries.

Globalization and Accountability of Public Investments in Science and Technology

Over the past three decades, the policy map directing science and technology has...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  • Ahn, Soon Il. 1995. A new program in cooperative research between academia and industry in Korea, involving Centers of Excellence. Technovation 15 (4): 241–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edquist, Charles, and Maureen McKelvey. 1998. High R&D intensity without high tech products: A Swedish paradox? In Institutions and economic change: New perspectives on markets, firms and technology, ed. Nielsen Klaus and Björn Johnson, 6–18. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ejermo Olot, Kander Astrid, and Svensson Henning Martin. 2011. The R&D-growth paradox arises in fast-growing sectors. Reserch Policy 40:664–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.03.004

  • Gajendra Nadarajah, Ranjit. 2014. Transnational research collaboration: Foresight and holistic solutions? Research Digest 5, International Education Association of Australia. Available via International Education Association of Australia. http://www.ieaa.org.au/documents/item/311.

  • Godin, Benoît. 2006. The linear model of innovation: The historical construction of an analytical framework. Science, Technology & Human Values 31 (6): 639–667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grubel, Herbert, and Anthony Scott. 1966. The international flow of human capital. American Economic Review 56 (1/2): 268–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guston, David H., and Kenneth Kenniston. 1994. The fragile contract: University science and the federal government, 1–24. Cambridge MA: MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.405015022.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hay, Collin. 2004. Re-stating politics, re-politicising the state: Neo-liberalism, economic imperatives and the rise of the competition state. Political Quarterly 75 (1): 38–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, Joachim. 1991. From the Fordist to the post-Fordist state. In The politics of flexibility: Restructuring state and industry in Britain, Germany and Scandinavia, ed. Bob Jessop, 307–333. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hood, Christopher. 2002. The risk game and the blame game. Government and Opposition 37 (1): 15–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-7053.00085.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, Po-Hsuan, J. Shyu, et al. 2003. Exploring the interaction between incubators and industrial clusters: The case of the ITRI incubator in Taiwan. R&D Management 33 (1): 79–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jasanoff, Sheila. 1997. Civilization and madness: The great BSE scare of 1996. Public Understanding of Science 6 (3): 221–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsson, Åsa, and Natalie, Cooke. 2013. The evolving path for strengthening research and innovation policy for development. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. Available via OECD. http://www.oecd.org/sti/The%20Evolving%20Path%20for%20Strengthening%20Research%20and%20Innovation%20Policy%20for%20Development-%20Asa%20Olsson%20and%20Natalie%20Cooke.pdf.

  • Romer, Paul M. 2001. Should the government subsidize supply or demand in the market for scientists and engineers? Innovation Policy and the Economy 1: 221–252. National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Åsa Olsson .

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Olsson, Å., Nadarajah, R.G. (2018). Human Capital Policy in Science and Technology. In: Encyclopedia of International Higher Education Systems and Institutions. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9553-1_260-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9553-1_260-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-017-9553-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-9553-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education

Publish with us

Policies and ethics