Skip to main content

Capability

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
  • 232 Accesses

Introduction

Capability means what a person can do and be, i.e., that person’s substantial freedom. To live a flourishing life, we need not only formal freedoms declared and stipulated on paper but also substantial ones that we can enjoy only through decent social arrangements. Although people’s ways of life vary across boundaries, everyone lives a life in need of this freedom to act as an agent. According to Amartya Sen, the pioneer of the concept capability, an agent is “someone who acts and brings about change, and whose achievements can be judged in terms of her own values and objectives, whether or not we assess them in terms of some external criteria as well” (Sen 1999: 19). In this sense, capability is a universally applicable concept.

Equality of What?

The term capability first drew the attention of legal and social philosophers in 1979 when Sen gave the Tanner Lecture on Human Values, titled “Equality of What?” at Stanford University; this was subsequently published as an...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  • Brock G (2009) Global justice: a cosmopolitan account. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks T (2012) Introduction. In: Brooks T (ed) Justice and the capabilities approach. Ashgate, Surrey

    Google Scholar 

  • Crocker DA (2008) Ethics of global development: agency, capability, and deliberative democracy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyal L, Gough I (1991) A Theory of human need. Macmillan, Basingstoke

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin R (1981) What is equality? Part 2: equality of resources. Philos Public Aff 10(4):283–345

    Google Scholar 

  • Gasper D (2004) The ethics of development: from economism to human development. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller D (2007) National responsibility and global justice. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum M (1988) Nature, function, and capability: aristotle on political distribution. In: Annas J, Grimm RH (eds) Oxford studies in ancient philosophy, vol 145, pp 145–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum M (1990) Aristotelian social democracy. In: Douglass RB et al (eds) Liberalism and the good. Routledge, New York, pp 203–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum M (1992) Human functioning and social justice: in defense of Aristotelian essentialism. Political Theory 20(2):202–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum M (2000) Women and human development: the capabilities approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum M (2006) Frontiers of justice: disability, nationality, species membership. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum M (2011) Creating capabilities: the human development approach. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum M, Sen A (1989) Internal criticism and Indian rationalist traditions. In: Krausz M (ed) Relativism: interpretation and confrontation. University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, Indiana

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum M, Sen A (eds) (1993) The quality of life. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Oosterlaken I, Hoven J (eds) (2012) The capability approach, technology and design. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Pogge T (2002) Can the capability approach be justified? Philos Top 30(2):167–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawls J (1971) A Theory of Justice. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls J (1999) The Law of Peoples with The Idea of Public Reason Revisited. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen A (1980) Equality of what? In: Tanner lectures on human values, vol 1. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen A (1992) Inequality reexamined. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen A (1993) Capability and well-being. In: Nussbaum M, Sen A (eds) The quality of life. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen A (1999) Development as freedom. Alfred A. Knopf, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen A (2005) Human rights and capabilities. J Hum Dev 6(2):151–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen A, Williams B (1982) Introduction: utilitarianism and beyond. In: Sen A, Williams B (eds) Utilitarianism and beyond. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuko Kamishima .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature B.V.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Kamishima, Y. (2019). Capability. In: Sellers, M., Kirste, S. (eds) Encyclopedia of the Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6730-0_29-2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6730-0_29-2

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-007-6730-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-007-6730-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Law and CriminologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics