Skip to main content

Metacommunity Dynamics of Riparian Ecosystems

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
  • 219 Accesses

Abstract

A metacommunity is defined as a network of communities populated by potentially interacting species that are linked across landscapes through dispersal. Metacommunity theory unifies landscape or regional processes, namely dispersal, with local processes such as niche dynamics. This unification of ecological theories can provide wetland and riparian ecologists with a framework to understand how community structure and dynamics are impacted by both regional and local processes. Understanding how processes occurring at different scales structure wetland communities can help wetland ecologists predict how landscape fragmentation impacts biodiversity and ecosystem functioning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  • Amarasekare P, Hoopes PM, Mouquet N, Holyoak M. Mechanisms of coexistence in competitive metacommunities. Am Nat. 2004;164:310–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Auerbach DA, Poff LN. Spatiotemporal controls of simulated metacommunity dynamics in dendritic networks. J N Am Benthol Soc. 2011;30:235–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boudell JA, Stromberg JC. Flood pulsing and metacommunity dynamics in a desert riparian ecosystem. J Veg Sci. 2008;19:373–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown BL, Swan CM. Dendritic network structure constrains metacommunity properties in riverine ecosystems. J Anim Ecol. 2010;79:571–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brown BL, Swan CM, Auerbach DA, et al. Metacommunity theory as a multispecies, multiscale framework for studying the influence of river network structure on riverine communities and ecosystems. J N Am Benthol Soc. 2011;30:310–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chase JM, Amarasekare P, Cottenie K, et al. Competing theories for competitive metacommunities. In: Holyoak M, Leibold MA, Holt RH, editors. Metacommunities: spatial dynamics and ecological communities. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press; 2005. p. 335–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cottenie K. Integrating environmental and spatial processes in ecological community dynamics. Eco Let. 2005;8:1175–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Driscoll DA, Lindenmayer DB. Empirical tests of metacommunity theory using an isolation gradient. Ecol Monogr. 2009;79:485–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fagan WF. Connectivity, fragmentation, and extinction risk in dendritic metapopulations. Ecology. 2002;83:3243–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanski I, Gilpin M. Metapopulation dynamics: Brief history and conceptual domain. Biol J Linn Soc. 1991;42:3–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holyoak M, Leibold MA, Holt RD. Metacommunities: spatial dynamics and ecological communities. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbell SP. The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbell SP. Neutral theory in community ecology and the hypothesis of functional equivalence. Funct Ecol. 2005;19:166–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leibold MA, Holyoak M, Mouquet N, et al. The metacommunity concept: a framework for multi-scale community ecology. Ecol Lett. 2004;7:601–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Logue JB, Mouquet N, Peter H, Hillebrand H, The Metacommunity Working Group. Empirical approaches to metacommunities: a review and comparison with theory. Trends Ecol Evol. 2011;26:482–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Middleton BA. Flood pulsing in the regeneration and maintenance of species in riverine forested wetlands of the Southeastern United States. In: Middleton BA, editor. Flood pulsing in wetlands: restoring the hydrological balance. New York: Wiley; 2002. p. 223–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan Ernest SK, Brown JH, Thibault KM, White EP, Goheen JR. Zero sum, the niche, and metacommunities: long-term dynamics of community assembly. Am Nat. 2008;172:E257–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mouquet N, Loreau M. Community patterns in source-sink metacommunities. Am Nat. 2003;162:544–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muneepeerakul R, Bertuzzo E, Rinaldo A, Rodriguez-Iturbe I. Patterns of vegetation biodiversity: the roles of dispersal directionality and river network structure. J Theor Biol. 2008;252:221–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naiman RJ, Décamps H, Pollock M. The role of riparian corridors in maintaining regional biodiversity. Ecol Appl. 1993;3:209–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naiman RJ, Décamps H, McClain ME. Riparia: ecology, conservation and management of streamside communities. San Diego: Elsevier; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pillai P, Gonzalez A, Loreau M. Metacommunity theory explains the emergence of food web complexity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108:19293–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Swan CM, Brown BL. Advancing theory of community assembly in spatially structured environments: local vs regional processes in river networks. J N Am Benthol Soc. 2011;30:232–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urban MC, Skelly DK. Evolving metacommunities: toward an evolutionary perspective on metacommunities. Ecology. 2006;87:1616–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson DS. Complex interactions in metacommunities, with implications for biodiversity and higher levels of selection. Ecology. 1992;73:1984–2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jere A. Boudell .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Boudell, J.A. (2018). Metacommunity Dynamics of Riparian Ecosystems. In: Finlayson, C.M., et al. The Wetland Book. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9659-3_48

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics