Skip to main content

Economic Valuation of Wetlands: Valuation Methods

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
The Wetland Book

Abstract

Economic valuation methods are diagnostic tools which help assess individual or collective preferences for wetland ecosystem services in monetary terms. Such values can be estimated based on information directly derived from market transaction or through transactions in related markets. In cases where markets do not exist, individuals can still express value in terms of their ‘willingness to pay’ for a perceived increase in benefits or ‘willingness to accept’ compensation for a decrease in benefits. The choice of a valuation method needs to be made based on consideration of ecosystem services and the value component that is to be elicited. While direct market valuation techniques are suited for provisioning services, regulating services have been mostly valued using production function techniques or avoided costs and cultural services through a range of stated and revealed preference methods. The potential advantages and limitations, including the range of uncertainties associated with value estimates, need to be carefully considered while applying the values in policy contexts. For a robust policy interpretation, economic values need to be complemented by a good understanding of biophysical complexities as well as socio-political contexts in which ecosystem services are delivered and managed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Acharya G, Barbier EB. Valuing groundwater recharge through agricultural production in the Hadejia‐Nguru wetlands in northern Nigeria. Agric Econ. 2000;22(3):247–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbier EB. Valuing ecosystem services as productive inputs. Econ Policy. 2007;22(49):177–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birol E, Karousakis K, Koundouri P. Using a choice experiment to account for preference heterogeneity in wetland attributes: the case of Cheimaditida wetland in Greece. Ecol Econ. 2006;60(1):145–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carson RT, Flores NE, Meade NF. Contingent valuation: controversies and evidence. Environ Res Econ. 2001;19:173–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costanza R, Pérez-Maqueo O, Martinez ML, Sutton P, Anderson SJ, Mulder K. The value of coastal wetlands for hurricane protection. Ambio. 2008;37(4):241–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daily G, editor. Nature’s services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Washington, DC: Island Press; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Das S, Vincent RV. Mangroves protected villages and reduced death toll during Indian super cyclone. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(18):7357–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Do TN, Bennett J. Estimating wetland biodiversity values: a choice modelling application in Vietnam’s Mekong River Delta. Environ Dev Econ. 2009;14(2):163–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emerton, L., editor. Values and rewards: counting and capturing ecosystem water services for sustainable development. IUCN Water, Nature and Economics Technical Paper No. 1. Colombo, SriLanka: IUCN, Ecosystems and Livelihoods Group Asia; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howarth RB, Wilson MA. A theoretical approach to deliberative valuation: aggregation by mutual consent. Land Econ. 2006;82(1):1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koch EW, Barbier EB, Silliman BR, Reed DJ, Perillo GME, Hacker SD, Granek EF, et al. Non-linearity in ecosystem services: temporal and spatial variability in coastal protection. Front Ecol Environ. 2007;7(1):29–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kontoleon A, Pascual U. Incorporating biodiversity into integrated assessments of trade policy in the agricultural sector, volume II: reference manual, chapter 7. Geneva: Economics and Trade Branch, United Nations Environment Programme; 2007. Available at: www.unep.ch/etb/pdf/UNEP%20T+B%20Manual.Vol%20II.Draft%20June07.pdf

  • Maharana I, Rai SC, Sharma E. Valuing ecotourism in a sacred lake of the Sikkim Himalaya, India. Environ Conserv. 2000;27:269–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martínez-Alier J, Munda G, O’Neill J. Weak comparability of values as a foundation for ecological economics. Ecol Econ. 1998;26:277–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce DW, Pretty JN. Economic values and the natural world. London: Earthscan; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sathirathai S, Barbier EB. Valuing mangrove conservation in Southern Thailand. Contemp Econ Policy. 2001;19(2):109–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tapsuwan S, Ingram G, Burton M, Brennan D. Capitalized amenity value of urban wetlands: a hedonic property price approach to urban wetlands in Perth, western Australia. Aust J Agric Resour Econ. 2009;53(4):527–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vatn A, Bromley DW. Choices without prices without apologies. J Environ Econ Manag. 1994;26(2):129–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wattage P, Mardle S. Total economic value of wetland conservation in Sri Lanka identifying use and non-use values. J Wetl Ecol Manag. 2008;256(8):1517–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ritesh Kumar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Kumar, R. (2018). Economic Valuation of Wetlands: Valuation Methods. In: Finlayson, C.M., et al. The Wetland Book. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9659-3_298

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics