Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Monte Carlo Methods

Book cover Handbuch der Geodäsie

Part of the book series: Springer Reference Naturwissenschaften ((SRN))

Abstract

Monte Carlo methods deal with generating random variates from probability density functions in order to estimate unknown parameters or general functions of unknown parameters and to compute their expected values, variances and covariances. One generally works with the multivariate normal distribution due to the central limit theorem. However, if random variables with the normal distribution and random variables with a different distribution are combined, the normal distribution is not valid anymore. The Monte Carlo method is then needed to get the expected values, variances and covariances for the random variables with distributions different from the normal distribution.

The error propagation by the Monte Carlo method is discussed and methods for generating random variates from the multivariate normal distribution and from the multivariate uniform distribution. The Monte Carlo integration is presented leading to the sampling-importance-resampling (SIR) algorithm. Markov Chain Monte Carlo methods provide by the Metropolis algorithm and the Gibbs sampler additional ways of generating random variates. A special topic is the Gibbs sampler for computing and propagating large covariance matrices. This task arises when the geopotential is determined from satellite observations. The example of the minimal detectable outlier shows, how the Monte Carlo method is used to determine the power of a hypothesis test.

Zusammenfassung

Monte-Carlo-Methoden arbeiten mit Zufallszahlen aus Verteilungsfunktionen, um unbekannte Parameter oder allgemeine Funktionen unbekannter Parameter zu schätzen, und um ihre Erwartungswerte, Varianzen und Kovarianzen zu berechnen. Im allgemeinen nutzt man wegen des zentralen Grenzwertsatzes die multivariate Normalverteilung. Wenn jedoch Zufallsvariable mit der Normalverteilung mit Zufallsvariablen unterschiedlicher Verteilungen kombiniert werden, gilt die Normalverteilung nicht mehr. Die Monte-Carlo-Methode wird dann benötigt, die Erwartungswerte, Varianzen und Kovarianzen der Zufallsvariablen mit Verteilungen zu erhalten, die sich von der Normalverteilung unterscheiden.

Die Fehlerfortpflanzung durch die Monte-Carlo-Methode wird diskutiert und Methoden für die Generierung von Zufallswerten aus der multivariaten Normalverteilung und aus der multivariaten Gleichverteilung. Die Monte-Carlo-Integration der wesentlichen Stichprobe führt auf den SIR (sampling-importance-resampling) Algorithmus. Monte-Carlo-Methoden mit Markoff-Ketten verschaffen durch den Metropolis-Algorithmus und das Gibbs-Verfahren weitere Methoden, Zufallswerte zu generieren. Als besondere Aufgabe wird das Gibbs-Verfahren zur Berechnung und Propagation großer Kovarianzmatrizen behandelt. Dieses Problem tritt auf, wenn das Schwerefeld der Erde aus Satelltenbeobachtungen bestimmt wird. Das Beispiel der minimal aufzudekkenden Ausreißer zeigt, wie die Monte-Carlo-Methode benutzt wird, um die Trennschärfe eines Hypothesentests zu bestimmen.

This chapter is part of the series Handbuch der Geodäsie, volume “Mathematical Geodesy/ Mathematische Geodäsie”, edited by Willi Freeden, Kaiserslautern.

This contribution is based on the article: Koch, K.: Monte Carlo methods. GEM–Int. J. Geomath. 9(1), 117–143 (2018).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Acko, B., Godina, A.: Verification of the conventional measuring uncertainty evaluation model with Monte Carlo simulation. Int. J. Simul. Model. 4, 76–84 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Alkhatib, H., Kutterer, H.: Estimation of measurement uncertainty of kinematic TLS observation process by means of Monte-Carlo methods. J. Applied Geodesy 7, 125–133 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Alkhatib, H., Neumann, I., Kutterer, H.: Uncertainty modeling of random and systematic errors by means of Monte Carlo and fuzzy techniques. J. Applied Geodesy 3, 67–79 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Alkhatib, H., Schuh, W.D.: Integration of the Monte Carlo covariance estimation strategy into tailored solution procedures for large-scale least squares problems. J. Geodesy 81, 53–66 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Arnold, S.: The Theory of Linear Models and Multivariate Analysis. Wiley, New York (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Baarda, W.: Statistical Concepts in Geodesy. Publications on Geodesy, vol. 2, Nr. 4. Netherlands Geodetic Commission, Delft (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Baarda, W.: A Testing Procedure for Use in Geodetic Networks. Publications on Geodesy, vol. 2, Nr. 5. Netherlands Geodetic Commission, Delft (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Baselga, S.: Nonexistence of rigorous tests for multiple outlier detection in least-squares adjustment. J. Surv. Eng. 137, 109–112 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Beckman, R., Cook, R.: Outlier….s. Technometrics 25, 119–149 (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Besag, J.: Spatial interaction and the statistical analysis of lattice systems. J. R. Stat. Soc. B 36, 192–236 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Box, G., Muller, M.: A note on the generation of random normal deviates. Ann. Math. Stat. 29, 610–611 (1958)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cramér, H.: Mathematical Methods of Statistics. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1946)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dagpunar, J.: Principles of Random Variate Generation. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Devroye, L.: Non-Uniform Random Variate Generation. Springer, Berlin (1986)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Dietrich, C.: Uncertainty, Calibration and Probability, 2nd edn. Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  16. van Dorp, J., Kotz, S.: Generalized trapezoidal distributions. Metrika 58, 85–97 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Doucet, A., Godsill, S., Andrieu, C.: On sequential Monte Carlo sampling methods for Bayesian filtering. Stat. Comput. 10, 197–208 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Falk, M.: A simple approach to the generation of uniformly distributed random variables with prescribed correlations. Commun. Stat. Simul. 28, 785–791 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gaida, W., Koch, K.R.: Solving the cumulative distribution function of the noncentral F-distribution for the noncentrality parameter. Sci. Bull. Stanislaw Staszic Univ. Min. Metall. Geodesy b.90(1024), 35–44 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gelfand, A., Smith, A.: Sampling-based approaches to calculating marginal densities. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 85, 398–409 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gelman, A., Carlin, J., Stern, H., Rubin, D.: Bayesian Data Analysis, 2nd edn. Chapman and Hall, Boca Raton (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Geman, D., Geman, S., Graffigne, C.: Locating texture and object boundaries. In: Devijver, P., Kittler, J. (eds.) Pattern Recognition Theory and Applications, pp. 165–177. Springer, Berlin (1987)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Geman, S., Geman, D.: Stochastic relaxation, Gibbs distributions, and the Bayesian restoration of images. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. PAMI–6, 721–741 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Geman, S., McClure, D.: Statistical methods for tomographic image reconstruction. Bull. Int. Stat. Inst. 52-21.1, 5–21 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Gentle, J.: Random Number Generation and Monte Carlo Methods, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Gilks, W.: Full conditional distributions. In: Gilks, W., Richardson, S., Spiegelhalter, D. (eds.) Markov Chain Monte Carlo in Practice, pp. 75–88. Chapman and Hall, London (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Golub, G., van Loan, C.: Matrix Computations. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Gordon, N., Salmond, D.: Bayesian state estimation for tracking and guidance using the bootstrap filter. J. Guid. Control. Dyn. 18, 1434–1443 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Gundlich, B., Koch, K.R., Kusche, J.: Gibbs sampler for computing and propagating large covariance matrices. J. Geod. 77, 514–528 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Gundlich, B., Kusche, J.: Monte Carlo integration for quasi–linear models. In: Xu, P., Liu, J., Dermanis, A. (eds.) VI Hotine-Marussi Symposium on Theoretical and Computational Geodesy, pp. 337–344. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  31. Guo, J.F., Ou, J.K., Yuan, Y.B.: Reliability analysis for a robust M-estimator. J. Surv. Eng. 137, 9–13 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hennes, M.: Konkurrierende Genauigkeitsmaße – Potential und Schwächen aus der Sicht des Anwenders. Allgemeine Vermessungs-Nachrichten 114, 136–146 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Huber, P.: Robust estimation of a location parameter. Ann. Math. Stat. 35, 73–101 (1964)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. ISO: Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement. International Organization for Standardization, Geneve (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  35. JCGM: Evaluation of measurement data–supplement 2 to the “Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement”–Extension to any number of output quantities. JCGM 102:2011. Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology. (2011). www.bipm.org/en/publications/guides

  36. Kacker, R., Jones, A.: On use of Bayesian statistics to make the guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement consistent. Metrologia 40, 235–248 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Kargoll, B.: On the Theory and Application of Model Misspecification Tests in Geodesy. Universität Bonn, Institut für Geodäsie und Geoinformation, Schriftenreihe 8, Bonn (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Knight, N., Wang, J., Rizos, C.: Generalised measures of reliability for multiple outliers. J. Geod. 84, 625–635 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Koch, K.R.: Ausreißertests und Zuverlässigkeitsmaße. Vermessungswesen und Raumordnung 45, 400–411 (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Koch, K.R.: Parameter Estimation and Hypothesis Testing in Linear Models, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin (1999)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  41. Koch, K.R.: Monte-Carlo-Simulation für Regularisierungsparameter. ZfV–Z Geodäsie, Geoinformation und Landmanagement 127, 305–309 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Koch, K.R.: Determining the maximum degree of harmonic coefficients in geopotential models by Monte Carlo methods. Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica 49, 259–275 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Koch, K.R.: Gibbs sampler by sampling-importance-resampling. J. Geod. 81, 581–591 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Koch, K.R.: Introduction to Bayesian Statistics, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Koch, K.R.: Determining uncertainties of correlated measurements by Monte Carlo simulations applied to laserscanning. J. Appl. Geod. 2, 139–147 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Koch, K.R.: Evaluation of uncertainties in measurements by Monte Carlo simulations with an application for laserscanning. J. Appl. Geod. 2, 67–77 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Koch, K.R.: Minimal detectable outliers as measures of reliability. J. Geod. 89, 483–490 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Koch, K.R.: Bayesian statistics and Monte Carlo methods. J. Geod. Sci. 8, 18–29 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Koch, K.: Monte Carlo methods. GEM–Int. J. Geomath. 9(1), 117–143 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Koch, K.R., Brockmann, J.: Systematic effects in laser scanning and visualization by confidence regions. J. Appl. Geod. 10(4), 247–257 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Koch, K.R., Kargoll, B.: Outlier detection by the EM algorithm for laser scanning in rectangular and polar coordinate systems. J. Appl. Geod. 9, 162–173 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  52. Koch, K.R., Kusche, J., Boxhammer, C., Gundlich, B.: Parallel Gibbs sampling for computing and propagating large covariance matrices. ZfV–Z Geodäsie, Geoinformation und Landmanagement 129, 32–42 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  53. Koch, K.R., Schmidt, M.: Deterministische und stochastische Signale. Dümmler, Bonn (1994). ftp://skylab.itg.uni-bonn.de/koch/00_textbooks/Determ_u_stoch_Signale.pdf

  54. Kok, J.: Statistical analysis of deformation problems using Baarda’s testing procedures in: “Forty Years of Thought”. Anniversary Volume Occasion of Prof. Baarda’s 65th Birthday 2, 470–488 (1982). Delft

    Google Scholar 

  55. Kok, J.: On data snooping and multiple outlier testing. In: NOAA Technical Report NOS NGS 30. US Department of Commerce, National Geodetic Survey, Rockville (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  56. Lehmann, R.: Improved critical values for extreme normalized and studentized residuals in Gauss-Markov models. J. Geod. 86, 1137–1146 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Lehmann, R.: On the formulation of the alternative hypothesis for geodetic outlier detection. J. Geod. 87, 373–386 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Leonard, T., Hsu, J.: Bayesian Methods. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  59. Liu, J.: Monte Carlo Strategies in Scientific Computing. Springer, Berlin (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  60. Marsaglia, G., Bray, T.: A convenient method for generating normal variables. SIAM Rev. 6, 260–264 (1964)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Metropolis, N., Rosenbluth, A., Rosenbluth, M., Teller, A., Teller, E.: Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines. J. Chem. Phys. 21, 1087–1092 (1953)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Nowel, K.: Application of Monte Carlo method to statistical testing in deformation analysis based on robust M-estimation. Surv. Rev. 48(348), 212–223 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. O’Hagan, A.: Bayesian Inference, Kendall’s Advanced Theory of Statistics, vol. 2B. Wiley, New York (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  64. Pope, A.: The statistics of residuals and the detection of outliers. In: NOAA Technical Report NOS65 NGS1. US Department of Commerce, National Geodetic Survey, Rockville (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  65. Proszynski, W.: Another approach to reliability measures for systems with correlated observations. J. Geod. 84, 547–556 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Roberts, G., Smith, A.: Simple conditions for the convergence of the Gibbs sampler and Metropolis-Hastings algorithms. Stochastic Process. Appl. 49, 207–216 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Rubin, D.: Using the SIR algorithm to simulate posterior distributions. In: Bernardo, J., DeGroot, M., Lindley, D., Smith, A. (eds.) Bayesian Statistics, vol. 3, pp. 395–402. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  68. Rubinstein, R.: Simulation and the Monte Carlo Method. Wiley, New York (1981)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  69. Schader, M., Schmid, F.: Distribution function and percentage points for the central and noncentral F-distribution. Stat. Pap. 27, 67–74 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  70. Siebert, B., Sommer, K.D.: Weiterentwicklung des GUM und Monte-Carlo-Techniken. tm–Technisches Messen 71, 67–80 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Smith, A., Gelfand, A.: Bayesian statistics without tears: a sampling-resampling perspective. Am. Stat. 46, 84–88 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  72. Smith, A., Roberts, G.: Bayesian computation via the Gibbs sampler and related Markov Chain Monte Carlo methods. J. R. Stat. Soc. B 55, 3–23 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  73. Staff of the Geodetic Computing Center, S.: The Delft approach for the design and computation of geodetic networks. In: “Forty Years of Thought”. Anniversary Volume on the Occasion of Prof. Baarda’s 65th Birthday 1, 202–274 (1982). Delft

    Google Scholar 

  74. Teunissen, P.: Adjusting and testing with the models of the affine and similarity transformation. Manuscr. Geodaet. 11, 214–225 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  75. Teunissen, P.: Testing theory; An introduction. MGP, Department of Mathematical Geodesy and Positioning, Delft University of Technology, Delft (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  76. Teunissen, P., de Bakker, P.: Single-receiver single-channel multi-frequency GNSS integrity: outliers, slips, and ionospheric disturbances. J. Geod. 87, 161–177 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Wilks, S.: Mathematical Statistics. Wiley, New York (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  78. Xu, P.: Random simulation and GPS decorrelation. J. Geod. 75, 408–423 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author is indebted to Willi Freeden for his invitation to this contribution for HbMG and to Jan Martin Brockmann for his valuable comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute for Geodesy and Geoinformation, Theoretical Geodesy Group, University of Bonn, 53115, Nussallee 17, Bonn, Germany

    Karl-Rudolf Koch

Authors
  1. Karl-Rudolf Koch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karl-Rudolf Koch .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Lehr- und Forschungsgebiet "Geomathemati, TU Kaiserslautern, Kaiserslautern, Germany

    Willi Freeden

  2. Physikalische Geodäsie, TU München Inst. Astronomische und, München, Germany

    Reiner Rummel

Section Editor information

  1. Geomathematics Group, University of Kaiserslautern, Kaiserslautern, Germany

    Willi Freeden

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Koch, KR. (2018). Monte Carlo Methods. In: Freeden, W., Rummel, R. (eds) Handbuch der Geodäsie. Springer Reference Naturwissenschaften . Springer Spektrum, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-46900-2_100-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-46900-2_100-1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer Spektrum, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-46900-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-46900-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Referenz Naturwissenschaften

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Chapter history

  1. Latest

    Monte Carlo Methods
    Published:
    23 February 2020

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-46900-2_100-2

  2. Original

    Monte Carlo Methods
    Published:
    31 May 2018

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-46900-2_100-1

Search

Navigation