Zusammenfassung
Dem spezifischen Framing von persuasiven Botschaften im Gesundheitsbereich kommt eine große Bedeutung zu, da solche Kommunikate relevante Einflüsse auf erwünschte sowie gesundheitsförderliche Verhaltensweisen von Individuen hervorrufen können. Der Beitrag differenziert zunächst zwischen Äquivalenz- und Betonungs-Framing und zeigt deren Relevanz in der Gesundheitskommunikation. Der Schwerpunkt liegt im Folgenden auf den in der Literatur zur Gesundheitskommunikation bisher weniger beachteten Betonungs-Frames. Basierend auf einer Diskussion von zentralen Befunden werden anschließend Anregungen für die zukünftige Forschung gegeben.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Literatur
Barry, C. L., Brescoll, V. L., & Gollust, S. E. (2013). Framing childhood obesity: How individualizing the problem affects public support for prevention. Political Psychology, 34(3), 327–349. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12018.
Cacciatore, M. A., Scheufele, D. A., & Iyengar, S. (2016). The end of framing as we know it…and the future of media effects. Mass Communication and Society, 19(1), 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2015.1068811.
Coleman, R., Thorson, E., & Wilkins, L. (2011). Testing the effect of framing and sourcing in health news stories. Journal of Health Communication, 16(9), 941–954. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2011.561918.
Cotten, S. R., & Gupta, S. S. (2004). Characteristics of online and offline health information seekers and factors that discriminate between them. Social Science & Medicine, 59(9), 1795–1806. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.02.020.
Edwards, A., Elwyn, G., Covey, J., Matthews, E., & Pill, R. (2001). Presenting risk information – A review of the effects of „framing“ and other manipulations on patient outcomes. Journal of Health Communication, 6(1), 61–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730150501413.
Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Towards clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x.
Gallagher, K. M., & Updegraff, J. A. (2012). Health message framing effects on attitudes, intentions, and behavior: A meta-analytic review. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 43, 101–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-011-9308-7.
Haack, G., von Sikorski, C., Hänelt, M., & Schierl, T. (2018). Onlineinformationen zur Förderung einer informierten Entscheidung über die Teilnehme an einer Darmkrebsfrüherkennung. Evaluation und Rezeptionsanalyse eines Themenmoduls auf dem Frauen- und Männergesundheitsportal der Bundeszentrale für gesundheitliche Aufklärung (BZgA). Bundesgesundheitsblatt. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00103-018-2841-9.
Iyengar, S. (1991). Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–291.
Kim S. J., & Niederdeppe, J. (2014). Emotional expressions in antismoking television advertisements: consequences of anger and sadness framing on pathways to persuasion. Journal of Health Communication, 19(6), 692–709. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2013.837550
Kim, S.-H., & Willis, L. A. (2007). Talking about obesity: News framing of who is responsible for causing and fixing the problem. Journal of Health Communication, 12(4), 359–376. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730701326051.
Lwin, M. O., Ho, S. S., Younbo, J., Leng, T. Y., Wardoyo, R. J., & Jung, K. H. (2016). Effects of exergaming and message framing in school environments on physical activity attitudes and intentions of children and adolescents. Journal of Health Communication, 21(9), 969–978. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2016.1153759.
Major, L. H. (2009). Break it to me harshly: The effects of intersecting news frames in lung cancer and obesity coverage. Journal of Health Communication, 14(2), 174–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730802659939.
Matthes, J. (2007). Framing-Effekte. Zum Einfluss der Politikberichterstattung auf die Einstellungen der Rezipienten. Munich: Fischer.
Matthes, J. (2010). Frames in political communication: Toward clarification of a research program. In S. Allan (Hrsg.), Rethinking communication: Keywords in communication research (S. 123–136). Cresskill: Hampton Press.
Matthes, J. (2012). Framing politics: An integrative approach. American Behavioral Scientist, 56(3), 247–259. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764211426324.
Matthes, J. (2014). Framing. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
Meyerowitz, B. E., & Chaiken, S. (1987). The effect of message framing on breast self-examination attitudes, intentions, and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(3), 500–510. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.3.500.
Mokdad, A. H., Marks, J. S., Stroup, D. F., & Gerberding, J. L. (2004). Actual causes of death in the United States, 2000. Journal of the American Medical Association, 291(10), 1238–1245. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.291.10.1238.
Noar, S. M. (2006). A 10-year retrospective of research in health mass media campaigns: Where do we go from here? Journal of Health Communication, 11(1), 21–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730500461059.
O’Keefe, D. J., & Jensen, J. D. (2006). The advantages of compliance or the disadvantages of noncompliance? A meta-analytic review of the relative persuasive effectiveness of gain-framed and loss-framed messages. Communication Yearbook, 30, 1–43. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15567419cy3001_1.
O’Keefe, D. J., & Jensen, J. D. (2007). The relative persuasiveness of gain-framed and loss-framed messages for encountering disease prevention behaviors: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Health Communication, 12(7), 623–644. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730701615198.
O’Keefe, D. J., & Jensen, J. D. (2009). The relative persuasiveness of gain-framed and loss-framed messages for encountering disease detection behaviors: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Communication, 59(7), 296–316. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01417.x.
Price, V., & Tewksbury, D. (1997). News values and public opinion: A theoretical account of media priming and framing. In G. A. Barett & F. J. Boster (Hrsg.), Progress in communication sciences: Advances in persuasion (Bd. 13, S. 173–212). Greenwich: Ablex.
Riles, J. M., Sanglang, A., Hurley, R. J., & Tewksbury, D. (2015). Framing cancer for online news: Implications for popular perceptions of cancer. Journal of Communication, 65(6), 1018–1040. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12183.
Rimer, B. K., & Kreuter, M. W. (2006). Advancing tailored health communication: A persuasion and message effects perspective. Journal of Communication, 56(1), 184–201. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00289.x.
Rothman, A. J., & Salovey, P. (1997). Shaping perceptions to motivate healthy behavior: The role of message framing. Psychological Bulletin, 121(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.121.1.3.
Scheufele, D. A., & Tewksbury, D. (2007). Framing, agenda setting, and priming: The evolution of three media effects models. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 9–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-9916.2007.00326.x.
Shen, L. (2010). The effect of message frame in anti-smoking public service announcements on cognitive response and attitude toward smoking. Health Communication, 25(1), 11–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410230903473490.
von Sikorski, C., & Schierl, T. (2012). Effects of news frames on recipients’ information processing in disability sports. Journal of Media Psychology, 24(3), 113–123. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000069.
Sikorski, C. von, & Knoll, J. (2019). Framing political scandals: Exploring the multimodal effects of isolation cues in scandal news coverage on candidate evaluations and voting intentions. International Journal of Communication, 13, 206–228.
Smith, R. A. (2007). Media depictions of health topics: Challenge and stigma formats. Journal of Health Communication, 12(3), 233–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730701266273.
Sniderman, P., Brody, R., & Tetlock, P. (1991). Reasoning and choice: Explorations in political psychology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211(4481), 453–458.
Webb, M. S., Baker, E. A., & Rodriguez de Ybarra, D. (2010). Effects of culturally specific cessation messages on theoretical antecedents of behavior among low-income African American smokers. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 24(2), 333–341. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018700.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature
About this entry
Cite this entry
von Sikorski, C., Matthes, J. (2019). Framing-Effekte im Gesundheitsbereich. In: Rossmann, C., Hastall, M. (eds) Handbuch der Gesundheitskommunikation. Springer Reference Sozialwissenschaften. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-10948-6_25-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-10948-6_25-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-10948-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-658-10948-6
eBook Packages: Springer Referenz Sozialwissenschaften und Recht