Skip to main content

Advanced Image Retrieval Technology in Future Mobile Teaching and Learning

  • Living reference work entry
  • Latest version View entry history
  • First Online:
Handbook of Mobile Teaching and Learning
  • 86 Accesses

Abstract

Advanced image retrieval technology has been widely adopted in many academic and industrial institutions. Mobile technology has been adopted in teaching and learning in various disciplines. Image retrieval technology can improve learning efficiency, enhance memory by providing similar learning content, and engage students in learning. However, mobile technology presents a number of software and hardware barriers, such as computing capability, screen size, and the quality of wireless connections (see “Characteristics of Mobile Teaching and Learning”). It is believed the adoption of the advanced image retrieval technology will enhance the capability of visual content search and the teaching and learning experience of educators and students. The advanced image retrieval technology will play an important role in future mobile teaching and learning and higher education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alhassan, R. 2016. Mobile learning as a method of ubiquitous learning: Students’ attitudes, readiness, and possible barriers to implementation in higher education. Journal of Education and Learning 5 (1): 176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alkhezzi, F., and W. Al-Dousari. 2016. The impact of Mobile learning on ESP learners’ performance. The Journal of Educators Online 13 (2): 73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alley, M. 2009. Mobile learning. Edmonton: AU Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheon, J., et al. 2012. An investigation of mobile learning readiness in higher education based on the theory of planned behavior. Computers & Education 59 (3): 1054–1064.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Datta, R., et al. 2008. Image retrieval: Ideas, influences, and trends of the new age. ACM Computing Surveys 40 (2): 1–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demouy, V., et al. 2015. Why and how do distance learners use mobile devices for language learning? The EUROCALL Review 23 (2): 10–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng, J., et al. 2009. ImageNet: A large-scale hierarchical image database. Miami: IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duc, S., A. Depeursinge, I. Eggel, and H. MĂĽller. 2011. Mobile medical image retrieval. In Medical imaging 2011: Advanced PACS-based imaging informatics and therapeutic applications, 79670G. Bellingham: SPIE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, C. 2008. The effectiveness of m-learning in the form of podcast revision lectures in higher education. Computers and Education 50 (2): 491–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraga, L.M. 2012. Mobile learning in higher education. Ph.D., The University of Texas at San Antonio, Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennig, N. 2016. Library technology reports. Vol. 52. Chicago: American Library Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, E. and N. Zhou. 2017. What does the future hold for students starting university today? The Guardian. Australia, The Guardian.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, G.-J., and S.-C. Chang. 2016. Effects of a peer competition-based mobile learning approach on students’ affective domain exhibition in social studies courses. British Journal of Educational Technology 47 (6): 1217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ITU. 2016. Measuring the information society report, ITU.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, A., et al. 2010. Evolution of Mobile wireless communication networks: 1G to 4G. International Journal of Electronics & Communication Technology 1 (1): 68–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larive, C.K. 2008. A picture is worth a thousand words: Animations and simulations in the teaching of analytical science. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry 390: 71–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matzke, J., et al. 2017. Education and career development: Usefulness of virtual reality in assessment of medical student laparoscopic skill. Journal of Surgical Research 211: 191–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metzgar, M. 2017. Community-focused versus market-driven education. Hybrid Pedagogy. http://www.digitalpedagogylab.com/hybridped/community-focused-versus-market-driven-education/?utm_campaign=Feed%3A+HybridPed+%28Hybrid+Pedagogy%3A+a+digital+journal+of+learning%2C+teaching%2C+and+technology%29&utm_medium=feed&utm_source=feedburner

  • Mishra, S.K. 2013. Quality education for children, youth, and adults through mobile learning. In Pedagogical applications and social effects of mobile technology integration, ed. J. Keengwe, 225–237. Hershey: Information Science Reference.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Peter, E.D., and J.M. Gina. 2008. Working memory capacity and mobile multimedia learning environments: Individual differences in learning while mobile. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia 17 (4): 511–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Picard, D., et al. 2008. Image retrieval over networks: Active learning using ant algorithm. Multimedia, IEEE Transactions on 10 (7): 1356–1365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qiu, M., and D. McDougall. 2013. Foster strengths and circumvent weaknesses: Advantages and disadvantages of online versus face-to-face subgroup discourse. Computers & Education 67 (0): 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rattanarungrot, S., et al. 2014. A mobile service oriented multiple object tracking augmented reality architecture for education and learning experiences. International Association for Development of the Information Society, Madrid, Spain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Razavian, A.S., et al. 2014. CNN features off-the-shelf: An astounding baseline for recognition. The IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (CVPR) workshops, IEEE Xplore, 806–813.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rennie, F., and T. Morrison. 2013. E-learning and social networking handbook, resources for higher education. New York/London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Roediger, H.L., III, and M.A. Pyc. 2012. Inexpensive techniques to improve education: Applying cognitive psychology to enhance educational practice. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition 1: 242–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sana, F., et al. 2013. Laptop multitasking hinders classroom learning for both users and nearby peers. Computers & Education 62 (0): 24–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharples, M. 2000. The design of personal mobile technologies for lifelong learning. Computers & Education 34 (3–4): 177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sikora, T. 2001. The MPEG-7 visual standard for content description-an overview. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology 11 (6): 696–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smeulders, A. W. M., M. Worring, S. Santini, A. Gupta, and R. Jain. 2000. Content-based image retrieval at the end of the early years. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 22: 1349–1380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starostenko, O., et al. 2009. CBIR for image-based language learning within mobile environment. In Proceedings of the 52nd IEEE international Midwest symposium on circuits and systems, 734–738. Cancun: IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statista. 2016. Most popular Apple App Store categories in 2016 from http://www.statista.com/statistics/166976/popular-categories-in-the-app-store/.

  • Sun, D., and C.K. Looi. 2017. Focusing a mobile science learning process: Difference in activity participation. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning 12: 3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, D., et al. 2009. Does using Mobile device applications Lead to learning? Journal of Interactive Learning Research 20 (4): 469–485.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, I., et al. 2014. A virtual reality endoscopic simulator augments general surgery resident cancer education as measured by performance improvement. Journal of Cancer Education 29 (2): 333–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, J., et al. 1998. Intelligent mobile agents for information retrieval and knowledge discovery from distributed data and knowledge sources. In Information technology conference, 1998. IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yousafzai, A., et al. 2016. Multimedia augmented m-learning: Issues, trends and open challenges. International Journal of Information Management 36: 784–792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuh-Shyan, C., et al. 2004. A mobile butterfly-watching learning system for supporting independent learning. Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education, 2004. Proceedings. The 2nd IEEE international workshop on.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, G.J., Y.S. Chen, and K.P. Shih. 2004. A Content-Based Image Retrieval System for Outdoor Ecology Learning: A Firefly Watching System, Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Application (AINA’04), IEEE, Fukuoka, Japan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y. 2012a. An analysis of collaboration in the Australian and Chinese mobile telecommunication markets. School of Economics. Wollongong, University of Wollongong. Doctor of Philosophy (Economics): 321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y. 2012b. Developing animated cartoons for economic teaching. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice 9 (2): 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y. 2015. Characteristics of mobile teaching and learning. In Handbook of Mobile teaching and learning, ed. Y. Zhang. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, Y., et al. 2017. Travi-Navi: Self-deployable indoor navigation system. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking 25 (5): 2655–2669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zidoun, Y., et al. 2016. Students’ perception about mobile learning in Morocco: Survey analysis. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies 10 (4): 80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lei Wang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Wang, L., Zhang, Y.(. (2019). Advanced Image Retrieval Technology in Future Mobile Teaching and Learning. In: Zhang, Y., Cristol, D. (eds) Handbook of Mobile Teaching and Learning. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41981-2_53-2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41981-2_53-2

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-41981-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-41981-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Social SciencesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Chapter history

  1. Latest

    Advanced Image Retrieval Technology in Future Mobile Teaching and Learning
    Published:
    13 October 2018

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41981-2_53-2

  2. Original

    Advanced Image Retrieval Technology in Future Mobile Teaching and Learning
    Published:
    18 April 2015

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41981-2_53-1