Abstract
M-learning is often approached as an innovative method to teach, but quite often without the proper planning of the actual learning process and proper understanding of the implications on the pedagogy of the learning process in such a setting. Because of the multiple stakeholders in the process – the institution, the learners, the educators, the policy-makers, etc. – it is very difficult to encourage educators to engage with something so different that will require a rethink of their teaching practices. In addition, with so many different technical elements and challenges, it is often simply just too daunting a prospect.
It is also unfortunate that m-learning is often only limited to simply mobile access. A good m-pedagogy will not just transfer the learning process to a mobile device but incorporate the very nature of mobile, flexible, user-guided, bite-sized learning.
The recent rise of learning and learner analytics has also highlighted the issue of how students engage with university systems and the ethical consideration of such data being collected and used.
Real m-learning needs to have a real purpose, and the stakeholders need to see the value in it for it to have a chance to be a success. Having all the correct m-pedagogy in place and if both educators and learners see the value of engagement, m-learning can bring real benefits – flexibility of access and freedom of engagement therefore allow a real meaningful tailoring of the learning process. Only very recently have real attempts been made to motivate progression toward adaptive learning. Incorporation of pedagogy and AI (artificial intelligence) methods seems to be pointing to a future of real, adaptive, and effective m-learning.
References
Aubusson, P., S. Schuck, and K. Burden. 2009. Mobile learning for teacher professional learning: Benefits, obstacles and issues. Alternatives Journal 17 (3): 233–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687760903247641.
Beetham, H. 2014. Students’ experiences and expectations of the digital environment | Jisc, 23-06-2014. http://www.jisc.ac.uk/blog/students-experiences-and-expectations-of-the-digital-environment-23-jun-2014. Accessed 3 May 2018.
Beetham, H. 2017. Discovery tool – what we learned and where we go next. https://digitalcapability.jiscinvolve.org/wp/2017/08/31/discovery-tool-what-we-learned-and-where-we-go-next/. Accessed 3 May 2018.
Bennett, S., and K. Maton. 2010. Beyond the “digital natives” debate: Towards a more nuanced understanding of students’ technology experiences. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 26 (5): 321–331. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00360.x.
Callum, K. Mac, and L. Jeffrey. 2013. The influence of students’ ICT skills and their adoption of mobile learning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 29 (3): 303–314.
Clark, D. 2014. ‘Keynote speech, iTech 2014’. http://youtu.be/bO0W-2Kl_zQ
David, M. et al. 2012. Widening participation in higher education. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137283412.
De Quincey, E. et al. 2016. Learner analytics; The need for user-centred design in learning analytics. 3(9): 6–9. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.23-8-2016.151643.
Elias, T. 2011. Principles for mobile learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning 12: 143–156.
Gartner. 2017. Gartner says worldwide sales of smartphones grew 9 percent in first quarter of 2017. http://www.gartner.com/newsroom/id/3725117%0A. Accessed 3 May 2018.
JISC. 2014. Digital student project | Jisc, 2014. http://www.jisc.ac.uk/research/projects/digital-student. Accessed 3 May 2018.
JISC. 2017a. Building digital capability. https://www.jisc.ac.uk/rd/projects/building-digital-capability. Accessed 3 May 2018.
JISC. 2017b. JISC Learning_analytics_report.pdf, JISC Learning analytics services appendix terms and conditions. https://analytics.jiscinvolve.org/wp/files/2017/07/Jisc-Learning-Analytics-Service-TCs_20170725_Final.pdf. Accessed 3 May 2018.
Keyes, J. 2013. Bring your own devices (BYOD) survival guide. Boca Raton: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group.
Littlejohn, A. 2007. Preparing for blended e-learning. London: Routledge.
Mac Callum, K., and L. Jeffrey. 2014. Comparing the role of ICT literacy and anxiety in the adoption of mobile learning. Computers in Human Behavior 39: 8–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.05.024. Elsevier Ltd.
Margaryan, A., A. Littlejohn, and G. Vojt. 2011. Are digital natives a myth or reality? University students’ use of digital technologies. Computers & Education 56 (2): 429–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.09.004. Elsevier Ltd.
Maslow, A. 1943. A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review 50: 370–396. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054346.
Petrakieva, L. 2012. The shift to mobile devices. In User studies for digital library development, ed. M. Dobreva, A. O’Dwyer, and P. Feliciati, 159–165. London: Facet Publishing.
Petrakieva, L., and D. McArthur. 2017. Pre ICT induction – PICTI. https://goo.gl/HW8CTA. Accessed 3 May 2018.
Prensky, M. 2001. Digital natives, digital immigrants part 1. On the horizon 9 (5): 1–6. http://www.marcprensky.com/writing/Prensky–DigitalNativesDigitalImmigrants–Part1.pdf. Accessed 3 May 2018.
van Deursen, A.J., and J.A. van Dijk. 2013. The digital divide shifts to differences in usage. New Media & Society 16 (3): 507–526. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444813487959.
West, M., and C. Ei. 2014. Reading in the mobile era: a study of mobile reading in developing countries. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0022/002274/227436E.pdf. Accessed 3 May 2018.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature
About this entry
Cite this entry
Petrakieva, L., McArthur, D. (2019). Mobile Technologies and Learning: Expectations, Myths, and Reality. In: Zhang, Y., Cristol, D. (eds) Handbook of Mobile Teaching and Learning. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41981-2_28-2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41981-2_28-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-41981-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-41981-2
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Social SciencesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences
Publish with us
Chapter history
-
Latest
Mobile Technologies and Learning: Expectations, Myths, and Reality- Published:
- 17 October 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41981-2_28-2
-
Original
Mobile Technologies and Learning: Expectations, Myths, and Reality- Published:
- 11 April 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41981-2_28-1