Skip to main content

New York City’s Operations Support Tool: Utilizing Hydrologic Forecasts for Water Supply Management

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
  • 2121 Accesses

Abstract

The New York City Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) supplies over one billion gallons per day (BGD) of water to more than nine million people in the New York City metropolitan area, making it one of the largest suppliers of surface water in the United States. DEP’s water supply system is as complex as it is large; it draws water from three distinct watersheds and features a number of interconnections and redundancies allowing for a large number of potential operating conditions. The system has a wide range of objectives – from supplying clean, reliable water for municipal demand to meeting environmental flow requirements for downstream stakeholders. Combined with the existing system complexity, these disparate objectives can make operational decision making a challenge.

In 2013, DEP launched the Operations Support Tool (OST) – a state-of-the-art model built to assist the utility in water supply operation decisions. OST consists of a system model (OASIS) to simulate water supply operation decisions and a linked hydrodynamic two-dimensional water quality model (CE-QUAL-W2). The model is initialized using current system conditions (e.g., reservoir elevations, water quality conditions) and is driven forward in time using ensemble hydrologic forecasts. This setup gives DEP the ability to simulate a wide variety of operational strategies in near real-time, allowing for objective alternative analysis prior to making operational decisions. Ensemble hydrologic forecasts are a critical part of the success of this approach, as they enable DEP to evaluate decisions probabilistically by explicitly considering hydrologic uncertainty.

This chapter provides an overview of the New York City water supply system, details the hydrologic forecasts used in OST, and reviews a handful of real operational applications of OST and the hydrologic forecast system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   599.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   799.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • E.A. Anderson, N.H. Crawford, The Synthesis of Continuous Snowmelt Runoff Hydrographs on a Digital Computer (Department of Civil Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, 1964)

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Burnash, R. Ferral, R. McGuire, A Generalized Streamflow Simulation System, Conceptual Modeling for Digital Computers (California-Nevada River Forecast Center, Sacramento, 1973)

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Cole, S. Wells, CE-QUAL-W2: 2: A Two-Dimensional, Laterally Averaged, Hydrodynamic and Water Quality Model (U.S. Army Engineering and Research Development, Vicksburg, 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Day, Extended streamflow prediction using NWSRFS. J. Water Resour. Plan. Manag. 111, 157–170 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Decree Parties to the 1954 U.S. Supreme Court, Flexible Flow Management Program (Decree Parties to the 1954 U.S. Supreme Court Decree, Trenton, 2016)

    Google Scholar 

  • Delaware River Basin Commission, Water Quality Programs of the Delaware River Basin Commission (Delaware River Basin Commission, West Trenton, 2015)

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Demargne, L. Wu, S. Regonda, J. Brown, H. Lee, M. He, … Y. Zhu, The science of NOAA’s operational hydrological ensemble forecast service. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 79–98 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. Gelda, S. Effler, Modeling turbidity in a water supply reservoir: advancements and issues. J. Environ. Eng. Div. 133, 139–148 (2007a)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. Gelda, S. Effler, Simulation of operations and water quality performance of reservoir multilevel intake configurations. J. Water Resour. Plan. Manag. 133, 78–86 (2007b)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. Gelda, S. Effler, Testing and application of a two-dimensional hydrothermal model for a water supply reservoir: implications of sedimentation. J. Environ. Eng. Sci. 6, 73–84 (2007c)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • G. Gong, L. Wang, L. Condon, A. Shearman, U. Lall, A simple framework for incorporating seasonal streamflow forecasts into existing water resource management practices. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 46(3), 574–585 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. Hirsch, Stochastic hydrology model for drought management. J. Water Resour. Plan. Manage. 107, 303–313 (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  • New York City Department of Environmental Protection, History of New York City's Water Supply System (2016), Retrieved from New York City Department of Environmental Protection: http://www.nyc.gov/html/dep/html/drinking_water/history.shtml

  • New York Codes, Rules, and Regulations, 6 NYCRR Part 701. Classifications – Surface Waters and Groundwaters (New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Albany, 1991)

    Google Scholar 

  • New York State Department of Environmental Conservation/New York City Department of Environmental Protection (DEC/DEP), New York State Department of Environmental Conservation/New York City Department of Environmental Protection (DEC/DEP) Interim Ashokan Release Protocol. DEC/DEP (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • NYCDEP, Refinement of New York City Water Demand Projections. Prepared by Hazen and Sawyer (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  • NYCDEP, History of Drought and Water Consumption (2016), Retrieved from New York City Department of Environmental Protection: http://www.nyc.gov/html/dep/html/drinking_water/droughthist.shtml

  • NYSDEC, The Lower Hudson River Basin Waterbody Inventory and Priority Waterbodies List (Division of Water, Bureau of Watershed Assessment and Management, Albany, 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of the Delaware River Master, Historical Background (2015), Retrieved from Office of the Delaware River Master: http://water.usgs.gov/osw/odrm/intro.html#background

  • R. Seager, N. Pederson, Y. Kushnir, J. Nakamura, The 1960s drought and the subsequent shift to a wetter climate in the Catskill Mountains region of the New York City watershed. J. Clim. 25, 6721–6742 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • W. Sittner, C. Schauss, J. Monro, Continuous hydrograph synthesis with an API-type hydrologic model. Water Resour. Res. 5, 1007–1022 (1969)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • W.J. Weiss, G. Pyke, W. Becker, D. Sheer, R. Gelda, P. Rush, T. Johnstone, Integrated water quality modeling to support long-term planning. J. Am. Water Works Assoc. 105, 217–228 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Zhao, Q. Duan, J. Schaake, A. Ye, J. Xia, A hydrologic post-processor for ensemble streamflow predictions. Adv. Geosci. 29, 51–59 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James Porter .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Porter, J., Day, G., Schaake, J.C., Wang, L. (2019). New York City’s Operations Support Tool: Utilizing Hydrologic Forecasts for Water Supply Management. In: Duan, Q., Pappenberger, F., Wood, A., Cloke, H., Schaake, J. (eds) Handbook of Hydrometeorological Ensemble Forecasting. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39925-1_56

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics