Skip to main content

Conceptual Hydrological Models

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:

Abstract

Conceptual hydrological models, sometimes also called gray-box models, are precipitation-runoff models built based on observed or assumed empirical relationships among different hydrological variables. They are different from black-box models which consider precipitation-runoff relationship only statistically. They are also different from the physically based distributed hydrological models which are based on solving differential equations describing the physical laws of mass, energy, and momentum conservations. This chapter describes how conceptual hydrological models represent the different hydrological processes involved in converting precipitation to runoff over land, and then to streamflow discharge at the basin outlet, including precipitation, snow accumulation and ablation, infiltration, soil moisture storage, evapotranspiration, runoff generation, baseflow, and river routing. Some of the well-known models are also used for illustration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   599.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   799.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • E.A. Anderson, A Point Energy and Mass Balance Model of a Snow Cover (U.S. Government printing office, Washington, DC, 1976), pp. 6–22

    Google Scholar 

  • R.G. Allen, L.S. Pereira, D. Raes, M. Smith, Crop evapotranspiration – Guidelines for computing crop water requirements, in FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56, (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, 1998)

    Google Scholar 

  • W.M. Bao, Conceptual Watershed Runoff and Sediment Model and Its Application in Loess Regions (Hohai University Press, Nanjing, 1995)

    Google Scholar 

  • K.J. Bevin, Robert E. Horton’s perceptual model of infiltration processes. Hydrol. Process. 18, 3447–3460 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R.J.C. Burnash, The NWS River Forecast System – Catchment Modeling, in Computer models of watershed hydrology, rev edn., ed. by V.P. Singh (Ed) (Water Resources Publications, Highlands Ranch, 1995). http://www.wrpllc.com/books/cmwh.html

  • V.T. Chow, D.R. Maidment, L.W. Mays, Applied Hydrology (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1988)

    Google Scholar 

  • A.J. Clemmens, Infiltration equations for border irrigation models. In: Advances in infiltration, Proceedings of the National Conference, Chicago, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Hillel, Environmental Soil Physics (Academic Press, San Diego, 1998)

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Hock, Temperature index melt modelling in mountain areas. J. Hydrol. 282, 104–115 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • H.N. Holtan, A concept for infiltration estimates in watershed engineering. USDA, Agricultural Research Service Publication, 41–51 (1961)

    Google Scholar 

  • R.E. Horton, An approach towards a physical interpretation of infiltration capacity. Soil Science Society of America 5, 399–417 (1940)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • V. Koren, The potential for improving lumped parameter models using remotely sensed data. 13th Conference on Weather Analysis and Forecasting, Vienna, 1993, pp 397–400

    Google Scholar 

  • A.N. Kostiakov, On the dynamics of the coefficients of water percolation in soils. Six Comm. Int. Soc. Soil Sci. Part A, 15–21 (1932)

    Google Scholar 

  • X. Liang, D.P. Lettenmaier, E.F. Wood, S.J. Burges, A simple hydrologically based model of land surface water and energy fluxes for general circulation models. J. Geophys. Res. 99(D7), 14415–14428 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M.R. Lewis, The rate of infiltration of water in irrigation practice. Trans. Am. Geophys. Union 18, 361–368 (1937)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D.R. Maidment, Handbook of Hydrology (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1993)

    Google Scholar 

  • G.T. McCarty, The unit hydrograph and flood routing, in US Army Corps of Engineers, Proceeding of conference of North Atlantic Division (US Engineers Office, 1938)

    Google Scholar 

  • V.J. Mezencev, Theory of formation of the surface runoff [Russian]. Meteorologia e Hidrologia 3, 33–40 (1948)

    Google Scholar 

  • V. Novotny, H. Olem, Water Quality: Prevention, Identification, and Management of Diffuse Pollution (Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1994)

    Google Scholar 

  • H.L. Penman, Natural evaporation from open water, bare soil, and grass. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A Math. Phys. Sci. 193(1032), 120–145 (1948)

    Google Scholar 

  • A.G. Price, T. Dunne, Energy balance computations of snowmelt in a subarctic area. Water Resour. Res. 12(4), 686–694 (1976)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J.A. Ramírez, Prediction and Modeling of flood hydrology and hydraulics, in Land Flood Hazards, 1st edn., (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000), pp. 293–333

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • W.J. Rawls, L.R. Ahuja, D.L. Brakensiek, A. Shirmohammadi, Infiltration and soil water movement, in Handbook of Hydrology, ed. by D.R. Maidment (Ed), (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1993)

    Google Scholar 

  • L.A. Richards, Capillary conduction through porous mediums. Physics 1, 313–318 (1931)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J.C. Schaake, V.I. Koren, Q.Y. Duan, K. Mitchell, F. Chen, Simple water balance model for estimating runoff at different spatial and temporal scales. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 101(D3), 7461–7475 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • T. Strelkoff, Modified Puls routing in Chuquatonchee Creek (Hydrologic Engineering Center, US Army Corps of Engineers, 1980), pp. 12–18

    Google Scholar 

  • A.H. Thiessen, Precipitation averages for large areas. Mon. Weather Rev. 39, 1082–1084 (1911)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • C.W. Thornthwaite, An approach toward a rational classification of climate. Geogr. Rev. 38(1), 55–94 (1948)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WMO (World Meteorological Organization), Tank model, HOMS component J04.1.01 (1981) http://www.wmo.int/pages/prog/hwrp/homs/Components/English/j04101.htm

  • R.J. Zhao, X.R. Liu, V. Singh, The Xinanjiang model, in Computer Models of Watershed Hydrology, ed. by V.P. Singh (Ed), (Water Resources Publications, Colorado, 1995), pp. 215–232

    Google Scholar 

  • R.J. Zhao, Y.L. Zhuang, L.R. Fang, X.R. Liu, Q.S. Zhao, The Xinanjiang model, hydrological Foreasting proceedings Oxford symposium. IAHS 129, 351–356 (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  • R.J. Zhao, The Xinanjiang model applied in China. J. Hydrol. 135(1–4), 371–381 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Zhaofei Liu or Zongxue Xu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Liu, Z., Wang, Y., Xu, Z., Duan, Q. (2019). Conceptual Hydrological Models. In: Duan, Q., Pappenberger, F., Wood, A., Cloke, H., Schaake, J. (eds) Handbook of Hydrometeorological Ensemble Forecasting. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39925-1_22

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics