Skip to main content

Attributes of Forecast Quality

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:

Abstract

Forecast verification is a process used to assess the quality of hydrometeorological ensemble forecasts. This chapter describes the many aspects of forecast quality using a distributions-oriented approach. Using the joint distribution of forecasts and observations, or one of its factorizations into a conditional and marginal distribution, the aspects of forecast quality are defined. Hypothetical ensemble forecasts are then used to illustrate aspects of forecast quality. The hypothetical ensemble forecasts are used to construct single-valued forecasts, probability forecasts for an event, and ensemble probability distribution forecasts. Their forecast quality is then diagnosed using visual comparisons and numerical comparisons of forecast quality measures. The examples illustrate that a single aspect of forecast quality is insufficient and that many aspects are needed to understand the nature of the forecasts. Some practical considerations in the application of the framework to ensemble forecast verification are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   599.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   799.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • C. Accadia, S. Mariani, M. Casaioli, A. Lavagnini, A. Speranza, Sensitivity of precipitation forecast skill scores to bilinear interpolation and a simple nearest-neighbor average method on high-resolution verification grids. Weather Forecast. 18, 918–932 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • C. Accadia, S. Mariani, M. Casaioli, A. Lavagnini, A. Speranza, Verification of precipitation forecasts from two limited-area models over Italy and comparison with ECMWF forecasts using a resampling technique. Weather Forecast. 20, 276–300 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • F. Atger, Spatial and interannual variability of the reliability of ensemble-based probabilistic forecasts: Consequences for calibration. Monthly Weather Review. 131(8), 1509–1523 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A.A. Bradley, S.S. Schwartz, Summary verification measures and their interpretation for ensemble forecasts. Mon. Weather Rev. 139, 3075–3089 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A.A. Bradley, T. Hashino, S.S. Schwartz, Distributions-oriented verification of probability forecasts for small data samples. Weather Forecast. 18, 903–917 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A.A. Bradley, S.S. Schwartz, T. Hashino, Distributions-oriented verification of ensemble streamflow predictions. J. Hydrometeorol. 5, 532–545 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A.A. Bradley, S.S. Schwartz, T. Hashino, Sampling uncertainty and confidence intervals for the Brier score and Brier skill score. Weather Forecast. 23, 992–1006 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • G.W. Brier, Verification of forecasts expressed in terms of probability. Mon. Weather Rev. 78, 1–3 (1950)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • G.W. Brier, R.A. Allen, Verification of weather forecasts, in Compendium of Meteorology, ed. by T.F. Malone (American Meteorological Society, Boston, 1951), pp. 841–848

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • J.D. Brown, D.J. Seo, A nonparametric postprocessor for bias correction of hydrometeorological and hydrologic ensemble forecasts. J. Hydrometeorol. 11, 642–665 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J.D. Brown, L. Wu, M. He, S. Regonda, H. Lee, D.-J. Seo, Verification of temperature, precipitation, and streamflow forecasts from the NOAA/NWS Hydrologic Ensemble Forecast Service (HEFS): 1. Experimental design and forcing verification. J. Hydrol. 519, 2869–2889 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Demargne, J. Brown, Y.Q. Liu, D.J. Seo, L.M. Wu, Z. Toth, Y.J. Zhu, Diagnostic verification of hydrometeorological and hydrologic ensembles. Atmos. Sci. Lett. 11, 114–122 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • F.J. Doblas-Reyes, V. Pavan, D.B. Stephenson, The skill of multi-model seasonal forecasts of the wintertime North Atlantic Oscillation. Climate Dynam. 21, 501–514 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • E.E. Ebert, L.J. Wilson, B.G. Brown, P. Nurmi, H.E. Brooks, J. Bally, M. Jaeneke, Verification of nowcasts from the WWRP Sydney 2000 forecast demonstration project. Weather Forecast. 19, 73–96 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • B. Efron, Nonparametric estimates of standard error: the jacknife, the bootstrap and other methods. Biometrika 68, 589–599 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • C.A. Ferro, Comparing probabilistic forecasting systems with the Brier score. Weather Forecast. 22, 1076–1088 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • K.J. Franz, H.C. Hartmann, S. Sorooshian, R. Bales, Verification of national weather service ensemble streamflow predictions for water supply forecasting in the Colorado River basin. J. Hydrometeorol. 4, 1105–1118 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • T. Gneiting, A.E. Raftery, A.H. Westveld, T. Goldman, Calibrated probabilistic forecasting using ensemble model output statistics and minimum CRPS estimation. Mon. Weather Rev. 133, 1098–1118 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • T. Gneiting, F. Balabdaoui, A.E. Raftery, Probabilistic forecasts, calibration and sharpness. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Stat Methodol. 69, 243–268 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • T. Gorgas and M. Dorninger, Quantifying verification uncertainty by reference data variation. Meteorologishe Zeitschrift. 21(3), 259–277 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • T.M. Hamill, Hypothesis tests for evaluating numerical precipitation forecasts. Weather Forecast. 14, 155–167 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • T.M. Hamill, J. Juras, Measuring forecast skill: is it real skill or is it the varying climatology? Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc. 132, 2905–2923 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • T. Hashino, A.A. Bradley, S.S. Schwartz, Evaluation of bias-correction methods for ensemble streamflow volume forecasts. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 11, 939–950 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • H. Hersbach, Decomposition of the continuous ranked probability score for ensemble prediction systems. Weather Forecast. 15, 559–570 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S. Jaun, B. Ahrens, Evaluation of a probabilistic hydrometeorological forecast system. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 13, 1031–1043 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • I. Jolliffe, Uncertainty and inference for verification measures. Weather Forecast. 22, 637–650 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • I.T. Jolliffe, D.B. Stephenson, Introduction, in Forecast Verification, ed. by I.T. Jolliffe, D.B. Stephenson (Wiley, Chichester, 2011), pp. 1–9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • T.L. Kane, B.G. Brown, Confidence intervals for some verification measures – a survey of several methods, in Preprints, 15th Conference on Probability and Statistics in the Atmospheric Sciences (American Meteorologic Society, Asheville, 2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Krzysztofowicz, The case for probabilistic forecasting in hydrology. J. Hydrol. 249, 2–9 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S.J. Mason, N.E. Graham, Areas beneath the relative operating characteristics (ROC) and relative operating levels (ROL) curves: statistical significance and interpretation. Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc. 128, 2145–2166 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S.J. Mason, G.M. Mimmack, The use of bootstrap confidence intervals for the correlation coefficient in climatology. Theor. Appl. Climatol. 45, 229–233 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J.E. Matheson, R.E. Winkler, Scoring rules for continuous probability distributions. Manag. Sci. 22, 1087–1095 (1976)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A.H. Murphy, Skill scores based on the mean-square error and their relationships to the correlation-coefficient. Mon. Weather Rev. 116, 2417–2425 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A.H. Murphy, What is a good forecast – an essay on the nature of goodness in weather forecasting. Weather Forecast. 8, 281–293 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A.H. Murphy, Forecast verification, in Economic Value of Weather and Climate Forecasts, ed. by R.W. Katz, A.H. Murphy (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997), pp. 19–74

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • A.H. Murphy, R.L. Winkler, A general framework for forecast verification. Mon. Weather Rev. 115, 1330–1338 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A.H. Murphy, R.L. Winkler, Diagnostic verification of probability forecasts. Int. J. Forecast. 7, 435–455 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D.N. Politis, J.P. Romano, The stationary bootstrap. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 89, 1303–1313 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J.M. Potts, Basic concepts, in Forecast Verification, ed. by I.T. Jolliffe, D.B. Stephenson (Wiley, Chichester, 2011), pp. 11–29

    Google Scholar 

  • D.J. Seo, H.D. Herr, J.C. Schaake, A statistical post-processor for accounting of hydrologic uncertainty in short-range ensemble streamflow prediction. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss. 3, 1987–2035 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D.B. Stephenson, Use of the “odds ratio” for diagnosing forecast skill. Weather Forecast. 15, 221–232 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J.E. Thornes, D.B. Stephenson, How to judge the quality and value of weather forecast products. Meteorol. Appl. 8, 307–314 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D.A. Unger, A method to estimate the continuous ranked probability score, in Nineth Conference on Probability and Statistics in Atmospheric Sciences (American Meteorological Society, Virginia Beach, 1985), pp. 206–213

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Welles, S. Sorooshian, G. Carter, B. Olsen, Hydrologic verification – a call for action and collaboration. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 88, 503 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D.S. Wilks, Statistical significance of long-range “optimal climate normal” temperature and precipitation forecasts. J. Climate 9, 827–839 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D.S. Wilks, Sampling distributions of the Brier score and Brier skill score under serial dependence. Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc. 136, 2109–2118 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D.S. Wilks, Statistical Methods in the Atmospheric Sciences, 3rd edn. (Academic, Amsterdam, 2011), p. 704

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Zhang, T. Casey, Verification of categorical probability forecasts. Weather Forecast. 15, 80–89 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to A. Allen Bradley , Julie Demargne or Kristie J. Franz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Bradley, A.A., Demargne, J., Franz, K.J. (2019). Attributes of Forecast Quality. In: Duan, Q., Pappenberger, F., Wood, A., Cloke, H., Schaake, J. (eds) Handbook of Hydrometeorological Ensemble Forecasting. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39925-1_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics