Skip to main content

Creative LearningĀ and the Possible

The Palgrave Encyclopedia of the Possible

Abstract

Creative learning serves as a vehicle for the possible. Creative learning moves people from what is currently known to new ways of thinking and acting. More specifically, creative learning refers to a process that results in new and personally meaningful understandings for oneself and others. The purpose of this entry is to provide an overview of the theoretical concept of creative learning and its posited relationship to the possible. Research and theoretical implications are also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    I want to thank the editor of the encyclopedia for requesting clarification on whether creative learning is limited to mini-c creativity. It is important to stress that although creative learning may often be experienced at a more subjective and ideational level (e.g., mini-c creativity, Beghetto and Kaufman 2007), it is also possible that the outcomes of creative learning can be represented in behavioral and material artifacts, which can be recognized by others as creative contributions (e.g., little-c or larger-c creativity, Kaufman and Beghetto 2009).

  2. 2.

    It can be argued from aĀ sociocultural perspective that the socio-cultural does not simply influence individuals from the ā€œoutside,ā€ but rather that the socio-cultural is interdependent with and co-constitutive of the creative learning process. I want to again thank the editor of the encyclopedia for noting this important sociocultural distinction.

References

  • Alexander, P. A., Schallert, D. L., & Reynolds, R. E. (2009). What is learning anyway? A topographical perspective considered. Educational Psychologist, 44, 176ā€“192.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Anderson, R. C., Pitts, C., & Smolkowski, K. (2017). Creative ideation meets relational support: Measuring links between these factors in early adolescence. Creativity Research Journal, 29(3), 244ā€“256. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2017.1360057.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Anderson, R. C., Haney, M., Pitts, C., Porter, L., & Bousselot, T. (2019). ā€œMistakes can be beautifulā€: Creative engagement in arts integration for early adolescent learners. The Journal of Creative Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.401.

  • Beghetto, R. A. (2016). Creative learning: A fresh look. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 15(1), 6ā€“23.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Beghetto, R. A. (2017). Creative openings in the social interactions of teaching. Creativity: Theories-Research-Applications, 3, 261ā€“273.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Beghetto, R. A., & Corazza, G. E. (2019). Dynamic perspectives on creativity: New directions for theory, research, and practice. Cham: Springer.

    BookĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Beghetto, R. A., & Kaufman, J. C. (2007). Toward a broader conception of creativity: A case for ā€œmini-cā€ creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 1(2), 73ā€“79.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Beghetto, R. A., & Schreiber, J. B. (2017). Creativity in doubt: Toward understanding what drives creativity in learning. In R. Leikin & B. Sriraman (Eds.), Creativity and giftedness (pp. 147ā€“162). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38840-3_10.

    ChapterĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Beghetto, R. A., & Schuh, K. (in press). Exploring the link between imagination and creativity: A creative learning perspective. In D. D. Preiss, D. Cosmelli, & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), Mind wandering and creativity. San Diego: Academic.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Cazden, C. B. (2001). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning (2nd ed.). Portsmouth: Heinemann.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Corazza, G. E. (2016). Potential originality and effectiveness: The dynamic definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 28(3), 258ā€“267. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2016.1195627.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Š•co, U. (1986). Semiotics and the philosophy of language. Bloomington: Indiana.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Gajda, A., Beghetto, R. A., & Karwowski, M. (2017). Exploring creative learning in the classroom: A multi-method approach. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 24, 250ā€“267.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Glăveanu, V. P. (2015). Creativity as a sociocultural act. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 49(3), 165ā€“180.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Glăveanu, V. P. (2017). The creative self in dialogue. In M. Karwowski & J. C. Kauf- man (Eds.), The creative self: How our beliefs, self-efficacy, mindset, and identity im- pact our creativity. Philadelphia: Elsevier.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Glăveanu, V., & Beghetto, R. A. (2016). The difference that makes a creative difference (R. A. Beghetto & B. Sriraman, Eds.). Cham: Springer.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Glaveanu, V. P., Hanchett Hanson, M., Baer, J., Barbot, B., Clapp, E. P., Corazza, G. E., ā€¦ Sternberg, R. J. (2019). Advancing creativity theory and research: A socio-cultural Manifesto. The Journal of Creative Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.395.

  • Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 14, 469ā€“479.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Jankowska, D. M., Czerwonka, M., Lebuda, I., & Karwowski, M. (2018). Exploring the creative process: Integrating psychometric and eye-tracking approaches. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1931. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01931.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  PubMed CentralĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Jung, R. E., & Vartanian, O. (Eds.). (2018). The Cambridge handbook of the neuroscience of creativity (1st ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316556238.

    BookĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Karwowski, M. (2018). The flow of learning. Europeā€™s Journal of Psychology, 14, 291ā€“295.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Karwowski, M., Lebuda, I., & Beghetto, R. A. (2019). Creative self-beliefs. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2009). Beyond Big and Little: The Four C Model of Creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13(1), 1ā€“12. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013688.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Lipnevich, A. A., & Smith, J. K. (Eds.). (2018). The Cambridge handbook of instructional feedback (1st ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316832134.

    BookĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Plucker, J., Beghetto, R. A., & Dow, G. (2004). Why isnā€™t creativity more important to educational psychologists? Potential, pitfalls, and future directions in creativity research. Educational Psychologist, 39, 83ā€“96.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Rothenberg. (2015). Flight from wonder: An investigation of scientific creativity. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Runco, M. A. (2018). Creative thinking. In L. J. Ball & V. A. Thompson (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 472ā€“486). New York: Routledge.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Runco, M. A., & Beghetto, R. A. (2019). Primary and secondary creativity. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 27, 7ā€“10.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Runco, M. A., & Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 92ā€“96.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Sawyer, R. K. (2012). Explaining creativity: The science of human innovation (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Schuh, K. L. (2017). Making meaning by making connections. Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-0993-2.

    BookĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Sefton-Green, J., Thomson, P., Jones, K., & Bresler, L. (Eds.). (2011). The Routledge international handbook of creative learning. London: Routledge.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Von Glasersfeld, E. (2013). Radical constructivism. New York: Routledge.

    BookĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (2004). Imagination and creativity in childhood. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 42, 7ā€“97.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Ward, T. B., & Kolomyts, Y. (2010). Cognition and creativity. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Wyse, D., & Spendlove, D. (2007). Partners in creativity: Action research and creative partnerships. Education, 3(13), 35ā€“32.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Zaitchik, D., Solomon, G. E. A., Tardiff, N., & Bascandziev, I. (2016). Conceptual change. In D. Barner & A. S. Baron (Eds.), Core knowledge and conceptual change (pp. 73ā€“88). https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190467630.003.0005.

    ChapterĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ronald A. Beghetto .

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

Ā© 2020 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Beghetto, R.A. (2020). Creative LearningĀ and the Possible. In: The Palgrave Encyclopedia of the Possible. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98390-5_57-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98390-5_57-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-98390-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-98390-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Chapter history

  1. Latest

    Creative Learning
    Published:
    11 March 2021

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98390-5_57-2

  2. Original

    Creative LearningĀ and the Possible
    Published:
    03 March 2020

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98390-5_57-1