Skip to main content

Assessing Learning Outcomes in Vocational Education

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
  • 2170 Accesses

Abstract

As vocational education and training develops, more energy must be invested in ensuring that sufficient learning has been achieved to warrant the award of a qualification and that people are ready for work. Many traditional and commonly used assessment approaches do not scale well, and there remains a pressing need for reform. This chapter distils insights from international investigations of student learning outcomes assessment and uses these to chart frontiers for innovation. The chapter begins with an historical tour of the field, taking stock of progress over the last 30 years by examining signature initiatives. It sets out a framework for understanding and guiding growth, reviews likely facilitators and blockers, and, through these analyses, advances a strategy for guiding future development. The strategy articulates technical, practical, and substantive dimensions of assessment. Energy is invested in discussing each of these dimensions and creating a picture of what assessment will look like in a decade’s time. The chapter’s final section clarifies governance arrangements which would have capacity to spur the kind of progress required to propel the field. Overall this chapter offers insights into the nature, relevance, research, and practice of assessment in VET.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   799.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allais S, Young M, Raffe D (2009) Introduction. In: Allais S, Raffe D, Strathdee R, Wheelahan L, Young M (eds) Learning from the first qualifications frameworks. International Labour Office, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • American Educational Research Association (AERA), American Psychological Association (APA) and the National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME) (2014) Standards for educational & psychological testing. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Association of American Colleges and Universities (AAC&U) and State Higher Education Executive Offices (SHEEO) (2015) MSC: a multi-state collaborative to advance learning outcomes assessment. Accessed 20 Sept 2016 from: http://www.sheeo.org/projects/msc-multi-state-collaborative-advance-learning-outcomes-assessment

  • Australian Learning and Teaching Council (ALTC) (2010) Learning and teaching academic standards project final report. Australian Learning and Teaching Council, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Qualifications Framework Council (AQFC) (2015) Australian qualifications framework. Accessed 1 Sept 2016 from: http://www.aqf.edu.au

  • Bennett R (2015) The changing nature of educational assessment. Rev Res Educ 39(1):370–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braeken J, Blömeke S (2016) Comparison of beliefs across countries: dealing with measurement invariance and local dependence using Bayesian elastics. Assess Eval Higher Educ 41:733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canny B, Coates H (2014) Governance models for collaborations involving assessment. Office for Learning and Teaching, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakroun B (2010) National qualification frameworks: from policy borrowing to policy learning. Eur J Educ 45(2):199–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cisco Networking Academy (2012) Advancing assessment with technology. Accessed 2 Dec 2016 from: http://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en_us/training-events/netacad/downloads/pdf/NetAcadPOV.pdf

  • Coates H (2010) Defining and monitoring academic standards in Australian higher education. High Educ Manag Policy 22(1):1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coates H (2014) Higher education learning outcomes assessment: international perspectives. Peter Lang, Frankfurt

    Google Scholar 

  • Coates H (2015) Assessment of learning outcomes. In: Pricopie R, Scott P, Salmi J, Curaj A (eds) Future of higher education in Europe. Volume I and Volume II. Springer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Coates H (2016) Assessing student learning outcomes internationally: insights and frontiers. Assess Eval Higher Educ 41(5):662–676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coates H (2017) The market for learning: leading transparent higher education. Springer, Dordrecht

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Coates H (2018) Research and governance architectures to develop the field of learning outcomes assessment. In: Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia O, Pant HA, Toepper M, Lautenbach C Kuhn C (eds) Assessment of learning outcomes in higher education: cross-national comparisons and perspectives. Dordrecht: Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • Coates H, Richardson S (2012) An international assessment of bachelor degree graduate’s learning outcomes. High Educ Manag Policy 23(3):51–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Coates H, James R, Baldwin G (2005) A critical examination of the effects of learning management systems on university teaching and learning. Tert Educ Manag 11:19–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education and Training (2017) Training packages. Accessed from: https://www.education.gov.au/training-packages

  • Dillon GF, Clyman SG, Clauser BE, Margolis MJ (2002) The introduction of computer-based case simulations into the United States medical licensing examination. Acad Med 77(10):94–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Educational Testing Service (ETS) (2014) Proficiency profile. Accessed 1 Sept 2014 from: www.ets.org/proficiencyprofile/about

  • Edwards D, Wilkinson D, Coates H, Canny B (2012) The Australian medical assessment collaboration: developing the foundations for a national assessment of medical student learning outcomes. Office of Learning and Teaching, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2012) Thematic working group ‘Assessment of Key Competences’: literature review, glossary and examples. European Commission, Brussells

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (EC) (2015) European qualifications framework. Accessed 1 Sept 2016 from: https://ec.europa.eu/ploteus/search/site?f%5B0%5D=im_field_entity_type%3A97

  • González J, Wagenaar R (2008) Universities’ contribution to the Bologna process: an introduction. Universidad de Deusto, Bilbao

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday-Wynes S, Misko J (2013) Assessment issues in VET: minimising the level of risk. NCVER, Adelaide

    Google Scholar 

  • Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE) (2015) £4 million awarded to 12 projects to pilot measures of learning gain. Accessed 1 Sept 2016 from: http://www.hefce.ac.uk/news/newsarchive/2015/Name,105306,en.html

  • International Testing Commission (ITC) (2015) Guidelines. Accessed 10 Sept 2016 from: https://www.intestcom.org/page/5

  • Lennon MC, Frank B, Lenton R, Madsen K, Omri A, Turner R (2014) Tuning: identifying and measuring sector-based learning outcomes in postsecondary education. Higher Education Quality Council of Ontario, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu OL, Mao L, Frankel L, Xu J (2016) Assessing critical thinking in higher education: the HEIghten™ approach and preliminary validity evidence. Educational Testing Service, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Loyalka P (2015) Initial results from an international study of student learning in higher education: China, Russia, and the US. Keynote paper presented at the 2nd symposium of learning science and online education. Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Luecht RM (2013) An introduction to assessment engineering for automatic item generation. In: Gierl MJ, Haladyna TM (eds) Automatic item generation: theory and practice. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lumina Foundation (2015) The degree qualifications profile. Accessed 1 Sept 2016 from: http://www.luminafoundation.org/files/resources/dqp.pdf

  • Marshall S, Henry R, Ramburuth P (2013) Improving assessment in higher education: a whole of institution approach. New South Books, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  • Melguizo T (2015) Are students gaining general and subject area knowledge in university? Evidence from Brazil. Higher Education

    Google Scholar 

  • Mislevy R, Haertel G, Yarnall L, Wentland E (2011) Evidence centered task design in test development. In: Secolsky C (ed) Measurement, assessment, and evaluation in higher education. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) (2008) Primum® computer-based case simulations (CCS). NBME, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Ofqual (2015) Qualifications and credit framework. Accessed 1 Sept 2016 from: https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofqual

  • Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (2015) Education at a glance. OECD, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (2017) Survey of adult skills (PIAAC). OECD, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson (2014) MyEconLab. Accessed 27 Aug 2014 from: www.pearsonmylabandmastering.com/northamerica/myeconlab

  • Rhodes T, Finley A (2013) Using the VALUE rubrics for improvement of learning and authentic assessment. AAC&U, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson S, Coates H (2014) Essential foundations for establishing equivalence in cross-national higher education assessment. High Educ 68(6):825–836

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuwirth LWT, van der Vleuten CPM (2012) The use of progress testing. Perspect Med Educ 1(1):24–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shattock M (2012) University governance. Perspect Policy Pract High Educ 16(2):56–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Shavelson R (2007) A brief history of student learning assessment: how we got where we are and a proposal for where to go next. Association of American Colleges and Universities, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Shavelson RJ, Domingue BW, Mariño JP, Mantilla AM, Morales JA, Wiley EE (2016) On the practices and challenges of measuring higher education value added: the case of Colombia

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith E (2010) A review of twenty years of competency-based training in the Australian vocational education and training system. Int J Train Dev 14(1):54–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Twigg CA (2003) Improving learning and reducing costs: new models for online learning. Educ Rev September/October:28–38

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Education, Scientific and Cultural Organisation (UNESCO) (2017) Global Education Monitoring Report. Accessed fromL https://en.unesco.org/gem-report

  • Wheelahan L (2009) From old to new – the Australian qualifications framework. In: Allais S, Raffe D, Strathdee R, Wheelahan L, Young M (eds) Learning from the first qualifications frameworks. International Labour Office, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia O, Kuhn C, Toepper M (2014) Modelling and assessing higher education learning outcomes in Germany. In: Coates H (ed) Advancing higher education learning outcomes. Peter Lang Publishers, Frankfurt

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hamish Coates .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Coates, H. (2019). Assessing Learning Outcomes in Vocational Education. In: McGrath, S., Mulder, M., Papier, J., Suart, R. (eds) Handbook of Vocational Education and Training . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94532-3_81

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics