Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Interaction Between Plants and Bacterial Endophytes Under Salinity Stress

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Endophytes and Secondary Metabolites

Part of the book series: Reference Series in Phytochemistry ((RSP))

Abstract

Salinity leads to a decline in agricultural production and an increase in the percentage of salinity-affected land which exceeds 20% of the world’s cultivated land. Endophytes are a class of endosymbiotic microorganisms widely distributed among plants and colonize intercellular and intracellular spaces of all plant compartments and do not cause any apparent infection or significant morphological change. Furthermore, endophytes have many beneficial effects on host plants including adaptation to biotic and abiotic stress such as salinity through different activities including the production of scavengers like reactive oxygen species that are produced in plants when exposed to salinity, production of ACC deaminase enzyme which is responsible for lowering the levels of ethylene in the plant, nitrogen fixation, production of compatible solutes, antibiotics, and phytohormones. The use of endophytic microbes is of particular interest in the development of agricultural applications that ensure improved performance of crops under salinity stress.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

ABA:

Abscisic acid

ACC:

1-amino cyclopropane-1-carboxylate

EC:

Electrical conductivity

ECe:

Electrical conductivity of the saturation extract

ESP:

Exchangeable sodium percentage

IAA:

Indole-3-acetic acid

ISR:

Induced systemic resistance

ROS:

Reactive oxygen species

SAR:

Sodium absorption ratio

References

  1. Numan M, Bashir S, Khan Y, Mumtaz R, Shinwari ZK, Khan AL, Khan A, Al-Harrasi A (2018) Plant growth promoting bacteria as an alternative strategy for salt tolerance in plants: a review. Microbiol Res 209:21–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2018.02.003

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kumar A, Verma JP (2018) Does plant—microbe interaction confer stress tolerance in plants: a review? Microbiol Res 207:41–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2017.11.004

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lata R, Chowdhury S, Gond SK, White JF Jr (2018) Induction of abiotic stress tolerance in plants by endophytic microbes. Lett Appl Microbiol 66:268–276. https://doi.org/10.1111/lam.12855

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Khan AL, Waqas M, Asaf S, Kamran M, Shahzad R, Bilal S, Khan MA, Kang SM, Kim YH, Yun BW, Al-Rawahi A, Al-Harrasi A, Lee IJ (2017) Plant growth promoting endophyte Sphingomonas sp. LK11 alleviates salinity stress in Solanum pimpinellifolium. Environ Exp Bot 133:58–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2016.09.009

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhu Y, She X (2018) Evaluation of the plant-growth-promoting abilities of endophytic bacteria from the psammophyte Ammodendron bifolium. Can J Microbiol 64:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjm-2017-0529

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Rouhier N, San Koh C, Gelhaye E, Corbier C, Favier F, Didierjean C, Jacquot JP (2008) Redox based anti- oxidant systems in plants: biochemical and structural analyses. BiochimBiophysActa 1780:1249–1260

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Glick BR (2014) Bacteria with ACC deaminase can promote plant growth and help to feed the world. Microbiol Res 169(1):30–39

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hardoim PR, van Overbeek LS, Berg G et al (2015) The hidden world within plants: ecological and evolutionary considerations for defining functioning of microbial endophytes. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev: MMBR 79(3):293–320. https://doi.org/10.1128/MMBR.00050-14

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Hassan SE (2017) Plant growth-promoting activities for bacterial and fungal endophytes isolated from medicinal plant of Teucrium polium L. J Adv Res 8(6):687–695

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Ruiz-Lozano JM, Porcel R, Azcon C, Aroca R (2012) Regulation by arbuscular mycorrhizae of the integrated physiological response to salinity in plants: new challenges in physiological and molecular studies. J Exp Bot 63(11):4033–4044. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ers126

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Jones A, Panagos P, Barcelo S, Bouraoui F, Bosco C, Dewitte O, Gardi C, Hervás J, Hiederer R, Jeffery S (2012) The state of soil in Europe – a contribution of the JRC to the European Environment Agency’s Environment State and Outlook R-SOER 2010

    Google Scholar 

  12. Tόth G, Montanarella L, Rusco E (2008) Threats to soil quality in Europe. EUR 23438 EN. Institute for Environment and Sustainability, Land Management and Natural Hazards Unit, Office for the Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, 162pp

    Google Scholar 

  13. Munns R (2005) Genes and salt tolerance: bringing them together. New Phytol 167:645–663

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Jamil A, Riaz S, Ashraf M, Foolad MR (2011) Gene expression profiling of plants under salt stress. Crit Rev Plant Sci 30(5):435–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Shrivastava P, Kumar R (2015) Soil salinity: a serious environmental issue and plant growth promoting bacteria as one of the tools for its alleviation. Saudi J Biol Sci 22:123–131

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Stolte J, Tesfai M, Øygarden L, Kværnø S, Keizer J, Verheijen F, Panagos P, Ballabio C, Hessel R (2015) Soil threats in Europe: status, methods, drivers and effects on ecosystem services. A review report, deliverable 2.1 of the RECARE project, vol EUR 27607. Office for Official Publications of the European Community, Luxembourg, pp 69–78

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bowyer C, Withana S, Fenn I, Bassi S, Lewis M, Cooper T, Benito P, Mudgal S (2009) Land degradation and desertification policy department economic and scientific policy IP/A/ENVI/ST/2008–23. European Parliament, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  18. Garg N, Manchanda G (2008) Salinity and its effects on the functional biology of legumes. Acta Physiol Plant 30:595–618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Brady NC, Weil RR (2008) Elements of the nature and properties of soils. Pearson Educational International, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  20. Murtaza G, Ghafoor A, Owens G, Qadir M, Kahlan UZ (2009) Environmental and economic benefits of saline-sodic soil reclamation using low-quality water and soil amendments in conjunction with a rice–wheat cropping system. J Agron Crop Sci 204(4):124–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rengasamy P (2010) Soil processes affecting crop production in salt-affected soils. Funct Plant Biol 37:613–620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sardinha M, Müller T, Schmeisky H, Joergensen RG (2003) Microbial performance in soils along a salinity gradient under acidic conditions. Appl Soil Ecol 23:237–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Rengasamy P (2006) Soil salinity and sodicity. In: Stevens D (ed) Growing crops with reclaimed wastewater. CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, pp 125–138

    Google Scholar 

  24. Marschner P (2012) Marschner’s mineral nutrition of higher plants, 3rd edn. Academic press, London

    Google Scholar 

  25. Isbell R (2002) The Australian soil classification. CSIRO publishing, Collingwood

    Book  Google Scholar 

  26. Qadir M, Schubert S (2002) Degradation processes and nutrient constraints in sodic soils. Land Degrad Dev 13:275–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Rengasamy P, Olsson K (1991) Sodicity and soil structure. Soil Res 29:935–952

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Oster J, Shainberg I, Abrol I (1996) Reclamation of salt-affected soil. In: Agassi M (ed) Soil erosion, conservation and rehabilitation. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 315–352

    Google Scholar 

  29. Rengasamy P, Sumner M (1998) Processes involved in sodic behavior. In: Sumner M, Naidu R (eds) Sodic soils: distribution, properties, management and environmental consequences. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 35–50

    Google Scholar 

  30. Jumberi A, Oka M, Fujiyama H (2002) Response of vegetable crops to salinity and sodicity in relation to ionic balance and ability to absorb microelentents. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 48(2):203–209

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Quirk JP (2001) The significance of the threshold and turbidity concentrations in relation to sodicity and microstructure. Aust J Soil Res 39:1185–1217

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Hu Y, Schmidhalter U (2002) Limitation of salt stress to plant growth. In: Hock B, Elstner CF (eds) Plant toxicology. Marcel Dekker Inc., New York, pp 91–224

    Google Scholar 

  33. Akbarimoghaddam H, Galavi M, Ghanbari A, Panjehkeh N (2011) Salinity effects on seed germination and seedling growth of bread wheat cultivars. Trakia J Sci 9(1):43–50

    Google Scholar 

  34. Singh KN, Chatrath R (2001) Salinity tolerance. In: Reynolds MP, Monasterio JIO, McNab A (eds) Application of physiology in wheat breeding. CIMMYT, Mexico, pp 101–110

    Google Scholar 

  35. Munns R, Rawson HM (1999) Effect of salinity on salt accumulation and reproductive development in the apical meristem of wheat and barley. Aust J Plant Physiol 26:459–464

    Google Scholar 

  36. Bano A, Fatima M (2009) Salt tolerance in Zea mays (L.) following inoculation with Rhizobium and Pseudomonas. Biol. Fertility Soils 45:405–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Zhu JK (2002) Salt and drought stress signal transduction in plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol 53:247–273

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Ashraf M (2004) Some important physiological selection criteria for salt tolerance in plants. Flora 199:361–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Netondo GW, Onyango JC, Beck E (2004) Sorghum and salinity: II. Gas exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence of sorghum under salt stress. Crop Sci 44:806–811

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Seckin B, Sekmen AH, Turkan I (2009) An enhancing effect of exogenous mannitol on the antioxidant enzyme activities in roots of wheat under salt stress. J Plant Growth Regul 28:12–20

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Dombrowski JE (2003) Salt stress activation of wound-related genes in tomato plants. Plant Physiol 132:2098–2107

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Mauch-Mani B, Mauch F (2005) The role of abscisic acid in plant–pathogen interactions. Curr Opin Cell Biol 8:409–414

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Scharf KD, Berberich T, Ebersberger I, Nover L (2012) The plant heat stress transcription factor (Hsf) family: structure, function and evolution. Biochim Biophys Acta 1819:104–119

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Miliute I, Buzaite O, Baniulis O, Stanys V (2015) Bacterial endophytes in agricultural crops and their role in stress tolerance: a review. Zemdirbyste-Agriculture 102(4):465–478. https://doi.org/10.13080/z-a.2015.102.060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Zhu JK (2000) Over expression of a delta-pyrroline-5- carboxylate synthetase gene and analysis of tolerance to water and salt stress in transgenic rice. Trends Plant Sci 6:66–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Munns R, Tester M (2008) Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annu Rev Plant Biol 59:651–681

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Sturz AV, Christie BR, Nowak J (2000) Bacterial endophytes: potential role in developing sustainable systems of crop production. Crit Rev Plant Sci 19:1–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0735-2689(01)80001-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Zhang J, Davies WJ (1991) Antitranspirant activity in xylem sap of maize plants. J Exp Bot 42:317–321

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Andrews JH (1992) Biological control in the phyllosphere. Annu Rev Phytopathol 30:603–635

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Pandey PK, Yadav SK, Singh A, Sarma BK, Mishra A, Singh HB (2012) Cross-species alleviation of biotic and abiotic stresses by the endophyte Pseudomonas aeruginosa PW09. J Phytopathol 160:532–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Redman RS, Freeman S, Clifton DR, Morrel J, Brown G, Rodriguez RJ (1999) Biochemical analysis of plant protection afforded by a non-pathogenic endophytic mutant of Colletotrichum magna. Plant Physiol 119:795–804

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Schulz B, Boyle C, Draeger S, Rommert AK, Krohn K (2002) Endophytic fungi: a source of novel biologically active secondary metabolites. Mycol Res 109:996–1004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Hamilton CE, Gundel PE, Helander M, Saikkonen K (2012) Endophytic mediation of reactive oxygen species and antioxidant activity in plants: a review. Fungal Divers 54(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-012-0158-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Sekmen AH, Turkan I, Takio S (2007) Differential responses of antioxidative enzymes and lipid peroxidation to salt stress in salt-tolerant Plantagomaritima and salt- sensitive Plantago media. Physiol Plant 131:399–411

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Rodriguez RJ, Henson J, Van Volkenburgh E, Hoy M, Wright L, Beckwith F, Kim YO, Redman RS (2008) Stress tolerance in plants via habitat-adapted symbiosis. ISME 2:404–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Baltruschat H, Fodor J, Harrach BD, Niemczyk E, Barna B, Gullner G, Janeczko A, Kogel KH et al (2008) Salt tolerance of barley induced by the root endophyte Piriformospora indica is associated with a strong increase in antioxidants. New Phytol 180:501–510

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Glick BR, Penrose DM, Li JP (1998) A model for the lowering of plant ethylene concentrations by plant growth-promoting bacteria. J TheorBiol 190:63–68. https://doi.org/10.1006/jtbi.1997.0532

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Iniguez AL, Dong YM, Carter HD, Ahmer BMM, Stone JM, Triplett EW (2005) Regulation of enteric endophytic bacterial colonization by plant defenses. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 18:169–178. https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI-18-0169

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Czarny JC, Grichko VP, Glick BR (2006) Genetic modulation of ethylene biosynthesis and signaling in plants. Biotechnol Adv 24(4):410–419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2006.01.003

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Sun Y, Cheng Z, Glick BR (2009) The presence of a 1-aminocyclopro- pane-1-carboxylate (ACC) deaminase deletion mutation alters the physiology of the endophytic plant growth-promoting bacterium Burkholderia phytofirmans PsJN. FEMS Microbiol Lett 296:131–136. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.2009.01625.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Ali S, Charles TC, Glick BR (2012) Delay of flower senescence by bacterial endophytes expressing 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate deaminase. J Appl Microbiol 113:1139–1144. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2012.05409.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Bian G, Zhang Y, Qin S, Xing K, Xie H, Jiang J (2011) Isolation and biodiversity of heavy metal tolerant endophytic bacteria from halotolerant plant species located in coastal shoal of Nantong. Acta Microbiol Sin 51(11):1538–1547

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Tiwari S, Singh P, Tiwari R, Meena KK, Yandigeri M, Singh DP, Arora DK (2011) Salt-tolerant rhizobacteria-mediated induced tolerance in wheat (Triticum aestivum) and chemical diversity in rhizosphere enhance plant growth. Biol Fertil Soils 47(8):907–916. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-011-0598-5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Fouda AH, Hassan SE, Eid AM, Ewais E (2015) Biotechnological applications of fungal endophytes associated with medicinal plant Asclepias sinaica (Bioss.). Ann Agric Sci 60(1):95–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Navarro L, Dunoyer P, Jay F, Arnold B, Dharmasiri N, Estelle M, Voinnet O, Jones JDG (2006) A plant miRNA contributes to antibacterial resistance by repressing auxin signaling. Science 312:436–439. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1126088

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Naz I, Bano A, TamoorUl H (2009) Isolation of phytohormones producing plant growth promoting rhizobacteria from weeds growing in Khewra salt range, Pakistan and their implication in providing salt tolerance to Glycine max L. Afr J Biotechnol 8(21):5762–5768

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Piccoli P, Travaglia C, Cohen A, Sosa L, Cornejo P, Masuelli R, Bottini R (2011) An endophytic bacterium isolated from roots of the halophyte Prosopis strombulifera produces ABA, IAA, gibberellins A(1) and A(3) and jasmonic acid in chemically-defined culture medium. Plant Growth Regul 64(2):207–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10725-010-9536-z

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Tuteja N (2007) Abscisic acid and abiotic stress signaling. Plant Signal Behav 2(3):135–138. https://doi.org/10.4161/psb.2.3.4156

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Vadassery J, Ritter C, Venus Y, Camehl I, Varma A, Shahollari B, Novak O, Strnad M, Ludwig-Mueller J, Oelmueller R (2008) The role of auxins and cytokinins in the mutualistic interaction between Arabidopsis and Piriformosporaindica. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 21:1371–1383. https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI-21-10-1371

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Hause B, Mrosk C, Isayenkov S, Strack D (2007) Jasmonates in arbuscularmycorrhizal interactions. Phytochemistry 68(1):101–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2006.09.025

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Herrera-Medina MJ, Steinkellner S, Vierheilig H, Bote JAO, Garrido JMG (2007) Abscisic acid determines arbuscule development and functionality in the tomato arbuscular mycorrhiza. New Phytol 175(3):554–564. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02107.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Rupple S, Franken P, Witzel K (2013) Properties of the halophyte microbiome and their implications for plant salt tolerance. Funct Plant Biol 2013(40):940–951. https://doi.org/10.1071/FP12355

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Taghavi S, van der Lelie D, Hoffman A, Zhang YB, Walla MD et al (2010) Genome sequence of the plant growth promoting endophytic bacterium Enterobacter sp. 638. PLoS Genet 6(5):e1000943. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1000943

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. Castillo UF, Strobel GA, Ford EJ, Hess WM, Porter H, Jensen JB, Albert H, Robison R, Condron MAM, Teplow DB, Stevens D, Yaver D (2002) Munumbicins, wide-spectrum antibiotics produced by Streptomyces NRRL 30562, endophytic on Kennedia nigricans. Microbiology 148:2675–2685

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Castillo U, Harper JK, Strobel GA, Sears J, Alesi K, Ford E, Lin J, Hunter M, Maranta M, Ge HY, Yaver D, Jensen JB, Porter H, Robison R, Millar D, Hess WM, Condron M, Teplow D (2003) Kakadumycins, novel antibiotics from Streptomyces sp NRRL 30566, an endophyte of Grevilleapteridifolia. FEMS Microbiol Lett 224:183–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1097(03)00426-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Ezra D, Castillo UF, Strobel GA, Hess WM, Porter H, Jensen JB, Condron MAM, Teplow DB, Sears J, Maranta M, Hunter M, Weber B, Yaver D (2004) Coronamycins, peptide antibiotics produced by a verticillate Streptomyces sp. (MSU-2110) endophytic on Monstera sp. Micro- biology 150:785–793. https://doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.26645-0

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Schulz B, Boyle C (2005) The endophytic continuum. Mycol Res 109:661–686. https://doi.org/10.1017/S095375620500273X

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Zhang HW, Song YC, Tan RX (2006) Biology and chemistry of endo- phytes. Nat Prod Rep 23:753–771. https://doi.org/10.1039/b609472b

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Verginer M, Siegmund B, Cardinale M, Mueller H, Choi Y, Miguez CB, Leitner E, Berg G (2010) Monitoring the plant epiphyte Methylobacterium extorquens DSM 21961 by real-time PCR and its influence on the strawberry flavor. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 74:136–145. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2010.00942.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Flowers TJ, Colmer TD (2008) Salinity tolerance in halophytes. New Phytol 179(4):945–963. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02531.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Porcel R, Ruiz-Lozano JM (2004) Arbuscular mycorrhizal influence on leaf water potential, solute accumulation, and oxidative stress in soybean plants subjected to drought stress. J Exp Bot 55(403):1743–1750. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erh188

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Manchanda G, Garg N (2011) Alleviation of salt-induced ionic, osmotic and oxidative stresses in Cajanus cajan nodules by AM inoculation. Plant Biosyst 145(1):88–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/11263504.2010.539851

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Jha Y, Subramanian RB, Patel S (2011) Combination of endophytic and rhizospheric plant growth promoting rhizobacteria in Oryza sativa shows higher accumulation of osmoprotectant against saline stress. Acta Physiol Plant 33:797–802. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-010-0604-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Robert-Seilaniantz A, Grant M, Jones JDG (2011) Hormone crosstalk in plant disease and defense: more than just jasmonate-salicylate antagonism. Annu Rev Phytopathol 49:317–343. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-phyto-073009-114447

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Zamioudis C, Pieterse CMJ (2012) Modulation of host immunity by beneficial microbes. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 25:139–150. https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI-06-11-0179

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Kloepper JW, Ryu CM (2006) Bacterial endophytes as elicitors of induced systemic resistance. In: Schulz BJE, Boyle CJC, Sieber TN (eds) Microbial root endophytes. Springer, Berlin, pp 33–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-33526-9_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  87. Ardanov P, Ovcharenko L, Zaets I, Kozyrovska N, Pirttilä AM (2011) Endophytic bacteria enhancing growth and disease resistance of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Biol Control 56:43–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2010.09.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Bordiec S, Paquis S, Lacroix H, Dhondt S, AitBarka E, Kauffmann S, Jeandet P, Mazeyrat-Gourbeyre F, Clement C, Baillieul F, Dorey S (2011) Comparative analysis of defence responses induced by the endo-phytic plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium Burkholderiaphytofir- mans strain PsJN and the non-host bacterium Pseudomonas syringaepv. pisi in grapevine cell suspensions. J Exp Bot 62:595–603. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erq291

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. van Loon LC, Bakker PAHM, van der Heijdt WHW, Wendehenne D, Pugin A (2008) Early responses of tobacco suspension cells to rhizobac- terialelicitors of induced systemic resistance. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 21:1609–1621. https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI-21-12-1609

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Pieterse CM, Van der Does D, Zamioudis C, Leon-Reyes A, Van Wees SC (2012) Hormonal modulation of plant immunity. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 28:489–521. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-cellbio-092910-154055

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Wei G, Kloepper JW, Tuzan S (1991) Induction of systemic resistance of cucumber to Colletotrichum orbiculare by select strains of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Phytopathol J 81:1508–1512. https://doi.org/10.1094/Phyto-81-1508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Blodgett JT, Eyles A, Bonello P (2007) Organ-dependent induction of systemic resistance and systemic susceptibility in Pinus nigra inoculated with Sphaeropsis sapinea and Diplodia scrobiculata. Tree Physiol 27:511–517. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/27.4.511

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Vu T, Hauschild R, Sikora RA (2006) Fusarium oxysporum endophytes induced systemic resistance against Radopholussimilis on banana. Nematology 8:847–852. https://doi.org/10.1163/156854106779799259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Bae H, Roberts DP, Lim H-S, Strem MD, Park S-C, Ryu C-M, Melnick RL, Bailey BA (2011) Endophytic Trichoderma isolates from tropical environments delay disease onset and induce resistance against Phytophthora capsici in hot pepper using multiple mechanisms. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 24:336–351. https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI-09-10-0221

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Gunatilaka AAL (2006) Natural products from plant-associated micro- organisms: distribution, structural diversity, bioactivity, and implications of their occurrence. J Nat Prod 69:509–526. https://doi.org/10.1021/np058128n

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  96. Higginbotham SJ, Arnold AE, Ibañez A, Spadafora C, Coley PD, Kursar TA (2013) Bioactivity of fungal endophytes as a function of endophyte taxonomy and the taxonomy and distribution of their host plants. PLoS One 8:e73192. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073192

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  97. Tejesvi MV, Segura DR, Schnorr KM, Sandvang D, Mattila S, Olsen PB, Neve S, Kruse T, Kristensen HH, Pirttilä AM (2013) An antimicrobial peptide from endophytic Fusarium tricinctum of Rhododendron tomentosum Harmaja. Fungal Divers 60:153–159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-013-0227-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. Tejesvi MV, Kajula M, Mattila S, Pirttilä AM (2011) Bioactivity and genetic diversity of endophytic fungi in Rhododendron tomentosum Harmaja. Fungal Divers 47:97–107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-010-0087-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Botany and Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Al-Azhar University, Nasr City/Cairo, Egypt

    Amr Fouda, Saad El Din Hassan, Ahmed Mohamed Eid & Emad El-Din Ewais

Authors
  1. Amr Fouda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Saad El Din Hassan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ahmed Mohamed Eid
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Emad El-Din Ewais
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Saad El Din Hassan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Botany, University of Calcutta, Kolkata, West Bengal, India

    Sumita Jha

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Fouda, A., Hassan, S.E., Eid, A.M., El-Din Ewais, E. (2019). The Interaction Between Plants and Bacterial Endophytes Under Salinity Stress. In: Jha, S. (eds) Endophytes and Secondary Metabolites. Reference Series in Phytochemistry. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90484-9_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation