Abstract
This chapter considers the importance of privacy in contemporary research and how best to deal with some of the challenges raised around privacy. It opens with a number of questions about privacy which will be considered in the chapter, including a consideration as to the impact that privacy has on research. Consideration is given to the history of how privacy has been treated (in the West) before looking at key issues of what privacy is and why it is valuable. The current debate focuses on concerns relating to national security, social media, and data analytics, while, looking ahead, the Internet of Things, facial recognition, and the potential for ubiquitous surveillance are raised. Finally, the chapter considers a number of means for managing privacy within the research context: consent, secure storage, anonymization and pseudonymization, and the difficulties that arise when working with groups of people.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Allen AL (1988) Uneasy access: privacy for women in a free society. Rowman & Littlefield, Totowa
Allen AL (1999) Privacy-as-data control: conceptual, practical, and moral limits of the paradigm. Conn Law Rev 32:861
Arthur C (2014) Facebook emotion study breached ethical guidelines, researchers say. The Guardian, 30 June 2014, sec. Technology. http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/jun/30/facebook-emotion-study-breached-ethical-guidelines-researchers-say
Bauman Z, Lyon D (2012) Liquid surveillance: a conversation, 1st edn. Polity Press, Cambridge, UK/Malden
Benn S (1971) Privacy, freedom, and respect for persons. In: Pennock J, Chapman R (eds) Nomos XIII: privacy. Atherton Press, New York
Bentham J (1995) The Panopticon writings. Verso Books, London, UK
Bishop L, Gray D (2017) Ethical challenges of publishing and sharing social media research data. In: Woodfield K (ed) The ethics of online research, vol 2. Emerald Publishing Limited, Bingley, pp 161–188
boyd d (2014) It’s complicated: the social lives of networked teens, 1st edn. Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut
boyd d, Crawford K (2012) Critical questions for big data. Inf Commun Soc 15(5):662–679. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.678878
Boye K, Vowles RB (2002). Kallocain (trans: Lannestock G), New edition. Madison/London: The University of Wisconsin Press
Bradbury R (2008) Fahrenheit 451, 4th edn. Harper Voyager, London
Cadwalladr C, Graham-Harrison E (2018) Revealed: 50 million Facebook profiles harvested for Cambridge Analytica in major data breach. The Guardian, 17 March 2018, sec. News. https://www.theguardian.com/news/2018/mar/17/cambridge-analytica-facebook-influence-us-election
DeCew JW (2000) The priority of privacy for medical information. Soc Philos Policy 17(2):213
Deleuze, G (1990) Postscript on the societies of control. L’Autre 1 (May)
Doyle T (2009) Privacy and perfect voyeurism. Ethics Inf Technol 11:181–189
Eggers D (2014) The circle. Penguin, London
Erwin A (2018) Attempt to access former IRA man’s Boston College tapes “replete with errors” court told. The Irish Times, 16 January 2018. https://www.irishtimes.com/news/crime-and-law/attempt-to-access-former-ira-man-s-boston-college-tapes-replete-with-errors-court-told-1.3357750
Etzioni A (1999) The limits of privacy. Basic Books, New York
EU Parliament, 2016. Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation)
Foucault M (1991) Discipline and punish: the birth of the prison, New edn. Penguin
Funder A (2004) Stasiland: stories from behind the Berlin Wall, New edn. Granta Books, London, UK
Gavison R (1984) Privacy and the limits of the law. In: Schoeman FD (ed) Philosophical dimensions of privacy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 346–402
Gavison (1992) Feminism and the public/private distinction. Stanford Law Rev 45(1):1–45
Hill K, Mattu S (2018) The house that spied on me. Gizmodo, 7 February 2018. https://gizmodo.com/the-house-that-spied-on-me-1822429852
Ienca M, Vayena E (2018) Cambridge Analytica and online manipulation. Scientific American Blog Network, 30 March 2018. https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/cambridge-analytica-and-online-manipulation/
Inness JC (1996) Privacy, Intimacy, and Isolation, New edn. Oxford University Press, New York
Jernigan C, Mistree BFT (2009) Gaydar: Facebook friendships expose sexual orientation. First Monday 14(10). http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2611/2302
Judges. n.d. Holy Bible: New International Version. 3:12–30
Lever A (2005) Feminism, democracy and the right to privacy. SSRN scholarly paper ID 2559971. Rochester: Social Science Research Network. http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2559971
Locke JL (2010) Eavesdropping: an intimate history. Oxford University Press, Oxford
MacAskill E, Dance G, Cage F, Chen G, Popovich N (2013) NSA files decoded: Edward Snowden’s surveillance revelations explained. The Guardian, 1 November 2013. http://www.theguardian.com/world/interactive/2013/nov/01/snowden-nsa-files-surveillance-revelations-decoded
Macnish K (2016) Government surveillance and why defining privacy matters in a post-Snowden world. J Appl Philos, May. https://doi.org/10.1111/japp.12219
Macnish K (2017) The ethics of surveillance: an introduction, 1st edn. Routledge, London/New York
Manson N, O’Neill O (2007) Rethinking informed consent in bioethics, Cambridge
Matthew. n.d. Holy Bible: New International Version. 6:6
McDonald H (2016) Boston College ordered by US court to hand over IRA tapes. The Guardian, 25 April 2016. http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2016/apr/25/boston-college-ordered-by-us-court-to-hand-over-ira-tapes
Moore A (2008) Defining privacy. J Soc Philos 39(3):411–428
Nathan DO (1990) Just looking: voyeurism and the grounds of privacy. Public Aff Q 4(4):365–386
Nissenbaum HF (2009) Privacy in context: technology, policy, and the integrity of social life. Stanford University Press, Stanford
Obama B (2016) Remarks by the president in precision medicine panel discussion. Whitehouse.Gov, 25 February 2016. https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2016/02/25/remarks-president-precision-medicine-panel-discussion
Ohm P (2009) Broken promises of privacy: responding to the surprising failure of anonymization. UCLA Law Rev 57(6):1701–1777
Orwell G (2004) 1984 nineteen eighty-four, New edn. Penguin Classics, London
Parent WA (1983) Privacy, morality and the law. Philos Public Aff 12(4):269–288
Polonetsky J, Tene O (2012) Privacy in the age of big data: a time for big decisions. Stanford Law Rev Online 64(February):63
Posner R (1984) An economic theory of privacy. In: Shoeman F (ed) Philosophical dimensions of privacy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 333–345
Preston A (2014) The death of privacy. The Guardian, 3 August 2014. http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/aug/03/internet-death-privacy-google-facebook-alex-preston
Rachels J (1975) Why privacy is important. Philos Public Aff 4(4):323–333
Regan PM (1995) Legislating privacy: technology, social values, and public policy. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill
Roessler B, Mokrosinska D (eds) (2015) Social dimensions of privacy: interdisciplinary perspectives. Cambridge University Press, New York
Salmons J (2017) Getting to yes: informed consent in qualitative social media research. In: Woodfield K (ed) The ethics of online research, vol 2. Emerald Publishing Limited, Bingley, pp 111–136
Sampson F (2016) “Whatever you say…”: the case of the Boston College tapes and how confidentiality agreements cannot put relevant data beyond the reach of criminal investigation. Policing J Policy Pract 10(3):222–231. https://doi.org/10.1093/police/pav034
Scanlon TM (1975) Thomson on privacy. Philos Public Aff 4(4):315–322
Solove DJ (2002) Conceptualizing privacy. Calif Law Rev 90(4):1087–1155
Squires J (1994) Private lives, secluded places: privacy as political possibility. Environ Plann D Soc Space 12(4):387–401. https://doi.org/10.1068/d120387
Tavani HT, Moor JH (2001) Privacy protection, control of information, and privacy-enhancing technologies. Comput Soc 31(1):6–11
Thomson JJ (1975) The right to privacy. Philos Public Aff 4(4):295–314
Tobitt C (2018) Observer’s Carole Cadwalladr: I became a “news slave” in pursuing Cambridge Analytica data harvesting scoop – Press Gazette. The Guardian, 22 March 2018. http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/observers-carole-cadwalladr-i-became-a-news-slave-in-pursuing-cambridge-analytica-data-harvesting-scoop/
Townsend L, Wallace C (2017) The ethics of using social media data in research: a new framework. In: Woodfield K (ed) The ethics of online research, vol 2. Emerald Publishing Limited, Bingley, pp 189–206
Turkle S (2017) Alone together: why we expect more from technology and less from each other, 3rd edn. Basic Books
Wang Y, Kosinski M (2018) Deep neural networks are more accurate than humans at detecting sexual orientation from facial images. J Pers Soc Psychol 114(2):246–257
Warren SD, Brandeis LD (1890) The right to privacy. Harv Law Rev:1–19
Weinstein M (2013) Is privacy dead? Huffington Post (blog), 24 April 2013. https://www.huffingtonpost.com/mark-weinstein/internet-privacy_b_3140457.html
Westin AF (2003) Social and political dimensions of privacy. J Soc Issues 59(2):431–453. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4560.00072
Williams ML, Burnapp P, Sloan L, Jessop C, Lepps H (2017) Users’ view of ethics in social media research: informed consent, anonymity and harm. In: Woodfield K (ed) The ethics of online research, vol 2. Emerald Publishing Limited, Bingley, pp 27–54
Woodfield K, Iphofen R (2017) Introduction to volume 2: the ethics of online research. In: Woodfield K (ed) The ethics of online research, vol 2. Emerald Publishing Limited, Bingley, pp 1–12
Zamyatin Y (1993) We (trans: Brown C). New edn. New York: Penguin Classics
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Macnish, K. (2019). Privacy in Research Ethics. In: Iphofen, R. (eds) Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_9-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_9-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-76040-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-76040-7
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities