Skip to main content

State Legitimacy

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
  • 116 Accesses

Introduction

As social creatures, human beings need order, organization, and protection for the very sustenance of their lives. The order, organization, and protection necessitate division of labor and decision-making mechanisms for the issues such as allocation of resources for defined purposes in daily routines. In this regard, the definition of purposes, the determination of the way of fulfilling these purposes, and those who take part in this process are few of the basic actions quite vital in the survival and sustenance of social communities. The very legitimacy of authority of an entity – be it a tribe, a city state, an empire, or a state in the modern sense – therefore, derives partially from the abovementioned needs of human beings.

In the process of survival and sustenance, the provision and ensuring security constitute significant part of sources from which the legitimacy of authority is derived. Therefore, the relation of legitimacy and security can be argued as highly...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  • Ayoob, M. (1995). The third world security predicament: State making, regional conflict and the international system. London: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, R. (1983). Gramsci, hegemony and international relations: An essay in method. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 12(2), 162–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1976). Communication and the evolution of society. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbes, T. (1965). Leviathan. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, J. (1980). Second treatise of government, C. B. Macpherson (Ed.). Cambridge: Hackett Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peoples, C., & Williams, N. V. (2010). Critical security studies: An introduction. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, C. (1990). Coercion, capital, and European states, AD 990–1990. Cambridge: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNDP. (1994). Human development report. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wæver, O., & Buzan, B. (2010). After the return to theory: The past, present, and future of security Studies. In A. Collins (Ed.), Contemporary security studies (pp. 463–483). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (2004). THE VOCATION LECTURES “Science as a vocation” “Politics as a vocation”, Edited and with an introduction by David Owen and Tracy B. Strong translation by Rodney Livingstone. Cambridge: Hackett Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

Further Reading

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hikmet Mengüaslan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Mengüaslan, H. (2020). State Legitimacy. In: Romaniuk, S., Thapa, M., Marton, P. (eds) The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Global Security Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74336-3_135-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74336-3_135-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-74336-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-74336-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Political Science and International StudiesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics