Abstract
The conventional view of leadership, especially which is manifested in producing deep-seated social change, has to be “heroic” in nature. While we do not argue that such leadership inevitably involves heroic actions, the idea that social change requires a “heroic leader” is closely examined in this chapter in the case of the Montgomery Bus Boycott of 1955–1957 and the women’s movement toward equal rights. Historical analyses of these two social justice movements revealed that there were many leaders who contributed to the agenda of ending racism and sexism. The evidence suggests that there were multiple “co-leaders” and that singling out just one person for the success or failure ignores the historical evidence and obfuscates the reality that real leadership for social change is not singular but co-relational. This chapter closely examines the role that Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. played in the Montgomery Bus Boycott, and it examines the broad-based assault on sexism through critical court cases which broke open the traditions of sexism and are still being pursued. The problem with “heroic” leaders is that they rest on the assumption of “entitism,” that is, that there are clear borders which separate leaders from followers when upon close examination there is a dynamic and fluid relationship between leaders and followers in which there are role reversals when the followers empower their leaders and consent to be led by them. The Montgomery Bus Boycott against racism on public transportation and the court cases regarding sexism in public life are examples that relational leadership theory offers a more accurate picture of successful social justice leadership in the past and in the future.
References
ACLU. (n.d.). Timeline of major Supreme Court decisions on women’s rights. American Civil Liberties Union. Retrieved from https://www.aclu.org/sites/default/files/field_document/101917a-wrptimeline_0.pdf
Alvesson, M., & Sveningsson, S. (2012). Un-and re-packing leadership: Context, relations, constructions and politics. In M. Uhl-Bien & S. M. Ospina (Eds.), Advancing relational leadership research: A dialogue among perspectives (pp. 203–225). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
Baldwin, J. (1961, Feb). The dangerous road before Martin Luther King. Harper’s Magazine, pp. 151–152. Retrieved from https://harpers.org/archive/1961/02/the-dangerous-road-before-martin-luther-king/
Blakemore, E. (2018, May 30). Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s landmark opinions on women’s rights. History. Retrieved from https://www.history.com/news/ruth-bader-ginsburgs-landmark-opinions-womens-rights-supreme-court
Couch, R. (2015, May 15). Poverty is sexist gets #strengthie support from Malala, Shonda Rhimes. Huffpost. Retrieved from https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/05/15/malala-one-campaign-strengthie_n_7291796.html
Crossley, N. (2012). Towards relational sociology. New York, NY: Routledge.
Donati, P. (2011). Relational sociology: A new paradigm for the social sciences. New York, NY: Routledge.
Donati, P., & Archer, M. S. (2015). The relational subject. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Eacott, S. (2015). Educational leadership relationally: A theory and methodology for educational leadership, management and administration. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
English, F. W. (2016). Towards a metanoia of global educational leadership. In R. Papa & F. W. English (Eds.), Educational leaders without borders: Rising to global challenges to educate all (pp. 63–82). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Emirbayer, M. (1997). Manifesto for a relational sociology. American Journal of Sociology, 103(2), 281–317.
Frady, M. (2002). Martin Luther King, Jr.: A life. New York, NY: Penguin Books.
Fraser, N. (2010). Re-framing justice in a globalizing world. In T. Lovell (Ed.), (Mis)recognition, social inequality and social justice (pp. 17–35). London, England: Routledge.
Fraser, N. (1996). Redistribution, recognition and participation. Retrieved from http://www.intelligenceispower.com/Important%20E-mails%20Sent%20attachments/Social%20Justice%20in%20the%20Age%20of%20Identity%20Politics.pdf
Gergen, K. (2009). Relational being: Beyond self and community. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Goldstone, L. (2005). Dark bargain: Slavery, profits, and the struggle for the constitution. New York, NY: Walker & Company.
Hutson, J. H. (Ed.). (1987). Supplement to max Ferrand’s: The records of the federal convention of 1787. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Jackson, T. (2008). Becoming king: Martin Luther King Jr. and the making of a national leader. Lexington, KY: The University Press of Kentucky.
King, R. (2007). Machiavelli: Philosopher of power. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
Kuhn, T.S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Library of Congress. (2018, June 27). The 14th Amendment. Retrieved from https://www.loc.gov/rr/program/bib/ourdocs/14thamendment.html
Library of Congress. (2018, June 27). The 14th Amendment. Retrieved from https://www.loc.gov/rr/program/bib/ourdocs/14thamendment.html
Mansfield, H. (1996). Machiavelli’s virtue. Chicago, CA: University of Chicago Press.
Mayer, H. (1998). All on fire: William Lloyd garrison and the abolition of slavery. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Griffin.
Merriam-Webster. (2018). Sexism. Merriam Webster’s dictionary. Retrieved from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/sexism
Merriam-Webster. (2003). Racism. Merriam Webster’s collegiate dictionary. Springfield, MA: Merriam-Webster, Inc.
National Women’s History Alliance. (n.d.). Writing women back into history. Retrieved from http://www.nwhp.org/resources/womens-rights-movement/detailed-timeline/
Ospina, S. M., & Uhl-Bien, M. (2012). Exploring the competing bases for legitimacy in contemporary leadership studies. In M. Uhl-Bien & S. M. Ospina (Eds.), Advancing relational leadership research: A dialogue among perspectives (pp. 1–42). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
Papa, R. (2017). Finding her in history: Confronting the traditions of misogyny. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Papa, R. (2016). The educational leader without borders: The conceptual frame. In R. Papa & F. W. English (Eds.), Educational leaders without borders: Rising to global challenges to educate all (pp. 1–38). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Papa, R., & English, F. (2014). Framing an International Imaginative Identity: A Monograph on Educational Leaders Without Borders. Retrieved from http://www.educationalleaderswithoutborders.com/who-we-are.html
PerryUndem. (2018, Sept 12). The state of gender equality for U.S. adolescents. Retrieved from https://www.planusa.org/docs/state-of-gender-equality-2018.pdf
Popper, K. (1968). The logic of scientific discovery. New York, NY: Harper and Row Publishers.
Riddick, L. D. (1959). Crusader without violence: A biography of Martin Luther King Jr. New York, NY: Harper & Brothers.
Searle, J. (1996). Contemporary philosophy in the United States. In N. Bunnin & E. P. Tsui-James (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to philosophy (pp. 1–24). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
Weissbourd, R., & The Making Caring Common Team. (2014). Leaning out: Teen girls and leadership biases. Making Caring Common Project: Harvard. Retrieved from https://mcc.gse.harvard.edu/leaningout
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
English, F.W., Papa, R. (2019). Social Justice Leadership Against Racism and Sexism: A Retrospective and Prospective Analysis. In: Papa, R. (eds) Handbook on Promoting Social Justice in Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74078-2_81-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74078-2_81-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-74078-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-74078-2
eBook Packages: Springer Reference EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education