Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Social Manufacturing and Open Design

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Book cover Responsible Consumption and Production

Part of the book series: Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals ((ENUNSDG))

  • 294 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Achterhuis H (2002) Borgmann, technology and the good life? And the empirical turn for philosophy of technology. Techné: Res Philos Technol 6(1):64–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonvoisin J, Boujut J-F (2015) Open design platforms for open source product development: current state and requirements. In: International conference on engineering design, ICED15, 27–30 July 2015, Politecnico di Milano, p 10

    Google Scholar 

  • Business Dictionary. http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/innovation.html. Viewed 4 Mar 2018

  • Chesbrough H, Bogers M (2014) Explicating open innovation: clarifying an emerging paradigm for understanding innovation. In: Chesbrough H, Vanhaverbeke W, West J (eds) New frontiers in open innovation. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 3–28, quote from p 17

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlander L, Gann DM (2010) How open is innovation? Res Policy 39(6):699–709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deloitte (2013) Manufacturing for Growth Strategies for Driving Growth and Employment Volume 1: Globally Competitive Policy A World Economic Forum Report. In collaboration with Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited, Published by World Economic Forum, Geneva, Switzerland, 2013

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox S (2013) Paradigm shift: Do-It-Yourself (DIY) invention and production of physical goods for use or sale. J Manuf Technol Manag 24(2):218–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox S (2016) Domesticating artificial intelligence: expanding human self-expression through applications of artificial intelligence in prosumption. J Consum Cult. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540516659126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geum Y, Jeon H, Lee H (2016) Developing new smart services using integrated morphological analysis: integration of the market-pull and technology-push approach. Serv Bus 10(3):531–555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghisellini P, Cialani C, Ulgiati S (2016) A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems. J Clean Prod 114:11–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gierej S (2017) The framework of business model in the context of industrial Internet of Things, 7th international conference on engineering, project, and production management. Procedia Eng 182:206–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GrabCAD community. https://grabcad.com. Viewed 11 Apr 2018

  • Gurtoo A, Vidosh S, Williams CC (2010) Explaining the do-it-yourself (DIY) retail market in a developing country: preliminary lessons from India. Int Rev Retail Distrib Consum Res 20(3):335–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haier Global. Innovation model. http://www.haier.net/en/about_haier/one_person_alone/. Viewed 9 Apr 2017

  • Hamari J, Sjöklint M, Ukkonen A (2016) The sharing economy: why people participate in collaborative consumption. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol 67(9):2047–2059. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayder A, Gao J, Maropoulos P, Cheunf WM (2005) Open standard, open source and peer-to-peer tools and methods for collaborative product development. Comput Ind 56(3):260–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2004.12.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu SJ (2013) Evolving paradigms of manufacturing: from mass production to mass customization and personalization, forty sixth CIRP conference on manufacturing systems. Procedia CIRP 7:3–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • i.Materialise (2018) https://i.materialise.com/en. Viewed 18 Apr 2018

  • Jiang P, Ding K, Leng J (2016) Towards a cyber-physical-social-connected and service-oriented manufacturing paradigm: social manufacturing. Manuf Lett 7:15–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mfglet.2015.12.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan AM, Haenlein M (2010) Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Bus Horiz 53(1):59–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King AM, Burgess SC, Ijomah W, McMahon CA (2006) Reducing waste: repair, recondition, remanufacture or recycle? Sustain Dev 14(4):257–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotler P (1986) The prosumer movement: a new challenge for marketers. Adv Consum Res 13:510–513

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanz M, Tuokko R (2017) Concepts, methods and tools for individualized production. Prod Eng 11(2):205–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leider M, Rashid A (2016) Towards circular economy implementation: a comprehensive review in context of manufacturing industry. J Clean Prod 115:36–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenthaler U (2017) Open innovation: past research, current debates, and future directions. Acad Manag Perspect 25(1):75. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.25.1.75, Articles, Published online: 30 Nov 2017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makerbot Thingiverse (2018) https://www.thingiverse.com/. Viewed 18 May 2018

  • Martin CJ (2016) The sharing economy: a pathway to sustainability or a nightmarish form of neoliberal capitalism? Ecol Econ 121:149–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin CJ, Upham P, Budd L (2015) Commercial orientation in grassroots social innovation: insights from the sharing economy. Ecol Econ 118:240–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mourtzis D, Doukas M (2014) Design and planning of manufacturing networks for mass customisation and personalisation: challenges and outlook, Robust Manufacturing Conference (RoMaC 2014). Procedia CIRP 19:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nylund H, Toivonen V, Salminen K, Tuokko R (2011) CSM hotel – a new manufacturing concept for small and medium enterprises. In: 44th CIRP international conference on manufacturing systems, Madison

    Google Scholar 

  • Open Source Ecology, community. https://www.opensourceecology.org. Viewed 11 Apr 2018

  • Quirky. Invention community. https://quirky.com. Viewed 10 Apr 2018

  • Rayna T, Striukova L, Darlington J (2015) Co-creation and user innovation: the role of online 3D printing platforms. J Eng Technol Manag 37:90–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RepRap Community. http://reprap.org. Viewed 11 Apr 2018

  • Roberts EB (2007) Managing invention and innovation. Res Technol Manag 50(1):35–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samaddar S, Rabinowitz G, Zhang GP (2005) An experimental analysis of solution performance in a resource sharing and scheduling problem – production, manufacturing and logistics. Eur J Oper Res 165(1):139–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter JA (2008) Capitalism, socialism and democracy, 3rd edn. HarperCollins Publishers, New York, pp 81–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Sensorica platform. http://www.sensorica.co/. Viewed 10 Apr 2018

  • Shapeways (2018) https://www.shapeways.com/. Viewed 18 May 2018

  • Shleifer A, Wishny RW (1990) Equilibrium short horizons of investors and firms. Am Econ Rev 80(2). Papers and proceedings of the hundred and second annual meeting of the American Economic Association, May 1990, pp 148–153. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2006560

  • SO SMART (2014) D1.2 Report on key indicators of social sustainability, p 37

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommarberg M (2016) Digitalization as a paradigm changer in machine-building industry, PhD thesis. https://tutcris.tut.fi/portal/files/8811102/sommarberg_1436.pdf

  • Sommarberg M, Mäkinen S (2017) Mechanisms of disruptive technological change: case studies in transformation of traditional industries. In: 2017 Proceedings of PICMET ‘17: technology management for interconnected world, p 8

    Google Scholar 

  • Tao F, Cheng Y, Zhang L, Nee AYC (2017) Advanced manufacturing systems: socialization characteristics and trends. J Intell Manuf 28:1079–1094. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-015-1042-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece DJ (2010) Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long Range Plan 43(2–3):172–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tekes (2014) https://www.tekes.fi/globalassets/global/ohjelmat-ja-palvelut/shok/temjul_27_2014_web25062 014.pdf

  • Trinckle (2018) URL: https://www.trinckle.com/index.php, last viewed 22 Jan, 2019

  • Umezawa O, Shinohara Y, Halada K (2017) Growth of ecomaterials and eco-efficiency in major metallic structural materials, handbook of ecomaterials, pp 1–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Utterback J (1994) Mastering the dynamics of innovation, how companies can seize opportunities in the face of technological change. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, p 253

    Google Scholar 

  • World Economic Forum (2015) Industrial Internet of Things: unleashing the potential of connected products and services. http://reports.weforum.org/industrial-internet-of-things/. Viewed 8 Apr 2018

  • World Water Forum (2016) White paper. https://www.pseau.org/outils/ouvrages/wwf7_white_paper_version _basse_resolution_2016.pdf

  • Zwass V (2010) Co-creation: toward a taxonomy and an integrated research perspective. Int J Electron Commer 15(1):11–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland

    Minna Lanz & Eeva Järvenpää

Authors
  1. Minna Lanz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Eeva Järvenpää
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Minna Lanz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Life Science, HAW Hamburg, Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany

    Walter Leal Filho

  2. Ctr Neurosci & Cell Biology, 1 Floor, Univ Coimbra, Edf Fac Medicina, Coimbra, Portugal

    Anabela Marisa Azul

  3. Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Passo Fundo University Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Passo Fundo, Brazil

    Luciana Brandli

  4. Ozyegin University, Istanbul, Turkey

    Pinar Gökcin Özuyar

  5. Centre for Work Related Studies, University of Chester, Chester, UK

    Tony Wall

Section Editor information

  1. Dept of Industrial Management, Center for Innovation and Technology Research, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland

    Ulla Saari

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Lanz, M., Järvenpää, E. (2019). Social Manufacturing and Open Design. In: Leal Filho, W., Azul, A., Brandli, L., Özuyar, P., Wall, T. (eds) Responsible Consumption and Production. Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71062-4_9-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71062-4_9-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-71062-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-71062-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Earth and Environm. ScienceReference Module Physical and Materials ScienceReference Module Earth and Environmental Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation