Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Handbook of Business Legitimacy pp 1–15Cite as

Stakeholder Value Creation: Legitimating Business Sustainability

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:

  • 255 Accesses

Abstract

The purpose of this chapter is to examine how business sustainability is considered and legitimated in stakeholder value creation studies. Based on a review of stakeholder value creation literature, a stakeholder value creation typology is presented. The typology consists of four categories, which are (1) focal firm orientation with economic value perspective, (2) stakeholder orientation with economic value perspective, (3) focal firm orientation with multiple value perspective, and (4) stakeholder orientation with multiple value perspective. Each category tells a somewhat different story of what the purpose of business is, who are the important stakeholders, what role does sustainability play in business, and how business sustainability is legitimated. A closer analysis reveals that the category of stakeholder orientation with a multiple value perspective shows the most potential to build the legitimacy of business sustainability on the profound meaning of sustainability with economic, social, and environmental dimensions. In this category, business sustainability is legitimized in terms of cooperative stakeholder relationships, continual negotiations, and collective efforts, where versatile value is created for various stakeholders, including values related to sustainability. The recommendations for future research draw attention to versatile and broad understanding of value, stakeholders, and value creation and dynamic, systemic, and multilevel stakeholder relationships and collaboration as subjects to understand the legitimation of business sustainability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  • Banerjee SB (2000) Whose land is it anyway? National interest, indigenous stakeholders, and colonial discourses. The case of the Jabiluka uranium mine. Organ Environ 13(1):3–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bansal P (2005) Evolving sustainably: a longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development. Strateg Manag J 26(3):197–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berman SL, Wicks AC, Kotha S, Jones TM (1999) Does stakeholder orientation matter? The relationship between stakeholder management models and firm financial performance. Acad Manag J 42(5):488–506

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosse DA, Phillips RA, Harrison JS (2009) Stakeholders, reciprocity, and firm performance. Strateg Manag J 30(4):447–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bundy J, Shropshire C, Buchholtz AK (2013) Strategic cognition and issue salience: toward an explanation of firm responsiveness to stakeholder concerns. Acad Manag Rev 38(3):352–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi J, Wang H (2009) Stakeholder relations and the persistence of corporate financial performance. Strateg Manag J 30(8):895–907

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clifton D, Amran A (2011) The stakeholder approach: a sustainability perspective. J Bus Ethics 98(1):121–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coff RW (2010) The coevolution of rent appropriation and capability development. Strateg Manag J 31(7):711–733

    Google Scholar 

  • Crilly D (2013) Recasting enterprise strategy: towards stakeholder research that matters to general managers. J Manag Stud 50(8):1427–1447

    Google Scholar 

  • Crilly D, Sloan P (2012) Enterprise logic: explaining corporate attention to stakeholders from the “inside-out”. Strateg Manag J 33(10):1174–1193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derry R (2012) Reclaiming marginalized stakeholders. J Bus Ethics 111:253–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Driscoll C, Starik M (2004) The primordial stakeholder: advancing the conceptual consideration of stakeholder status for the natural environment. J Bus Ethics 49(1):55–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman RE (1984) Strategic management: a stakeholder approach. Pitman, Marshfield

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman RE (2000) Business ethics at the millennium. Bus Ethics Q 10(01):169–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman RE (2010) Managing for stakeholders: trade-offs or value creation. J Bus Ethics 96:7–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman RE, Martin K, Parmar B (2007) Stakeholder capitalism. J Bus Ethics 74(4):303–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallo PJ, Christensen LJ (2011) Firm size matters: an empirical investigation of organizational size and ownership on sustainability-related behaviors. Bus Soc 50(2):315–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Castro R, Aguilera RV (2015) Incremental value creation and appropriation in a world with multiple stakeholders. Strateg Manag J 36(1):137–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Castro R, Francoeur C (2016) When more is not better: complementarities, costs and contingencies in stakeholder management. Strateg Manag J 37(2):406–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garriga E (2014) Beyond stakeholder utility function: stakeholder capability in the value creation process. J Bus Ethics 120(4):489–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gladwin TN, Kennelly JJ, Krause TS (1995) Shifting paradigms for sustainable development: implications for management theory and research. Acad Manag Rev 20(4):874–907

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hahn T, Kolk A, Winn M (2010) A new future for business? Rethinking management theory and business strategy. Bus Soc 49(3):385–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hahn T, Preuss L, Pinkse J, Figge F (2014) Cognitive frames in corporate sustainability: managerial sensemaking with paradoxical and business case frames. Acad Manag Rev 39(4):463–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haksever C, Chaganti R, Cook RG (2004) A model of value creation: strategic view. J Bus Ethics 49(3):295–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison JS, Wicks AC (2013) Stakeholder theory, value, and firm performance. Bus Ethics Q 23(1):97–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison JS, Bosse DA, Phillips RA (2010) Managing for stakeholders, stakeholder utility function, and competitive advantage. Strateg Manag J 31(1):58–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henisz WJ, Dorobantu S, Nartey LJ (2014) Spinning gold: the financial returns to stakeholder engagement. Strateg Manag J 35(12):1727–1748

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillman AJ, Keim GD (2001) Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: what’s the bottom line? Strateg Manag J 22(2):125–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hörisch J, Freeman RE, Schaltegger S (2014) Applying stakeholder theory in sustainability management: links, similarities, dissimilarities, and a conceptual framework. Organ Environ 27(4):328–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jawahar M, McLaughlin GL (2001) Toward a descriptive stakeholder theory: an organizational life cycle approach. Acad Manag Rev 26(3):397–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen MC (2002) Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. Bus Ethics Q 12(02):235–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones TM (1995) Instrumental stakeholder theory: a synthesis of ethics and economics. Acad Manag Rev 20(2):404–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones TM, Felps W (2013) Stakeholder happiness enhancement: a neo-utilitarian objective for the modern corporation. Bus Ethics Q 23(03):349–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones TM, Wicks AC (1999) Convergent stakeholder theory. Acad Manag Rev 24(2):206–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korschun D (2015) Boundary-spanning employees and relationships with external stakeholders: a social identity approach. Acad Manag Rev 40(4):611–629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcus J, Kurucz EC, Colbert BA (2010) Conceptions of the business–society–nature interface: implications for management scholarship. Bus Soc 49(3):402–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell RK, Agle BR, Wood DJ (1997) Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of who and what really counts. Acad Manag Rev 22(4):853–886

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myllykangas P, Kujala J, Lehtimäki H (2011) Analyzing the essence of stakeholder relationships: what do we need in addition to power, legitimacy, and urgency? J Bus Ethics 96:65–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Riordan L, Fairbrass J (2014) Managing CSR stakeholder engagement: a new conceptual framework. J Bus Ethics 125(1):121–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogden S, Watson R (1999) Corporate performance and stakeholder management: balancing shareholder and customer interests in the UK privatized water industry. Acad Manag J 42(5):526–538

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinkse J, Kolk A (2012) Addressing the climate change sustainable development nexus: the role of multistakeholder partnerships. Bus Soc 51(1):176–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pirson M, Malhotra D (2011) Foundations of organizational trust: what matters to different stakeholders? Organ Sci 22(4):1087–1104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preston LE, Donaldson T (1999) Dialogue. Acad Manag Rev 24(4):619–620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowley TJ (1997) Moving beyond dyadic ties: a network theory of stakeholder influences. Acad Manag Rev 22(4):887–910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sachs S, Maurer M (2009) Toward dynamic corporate stakeholder responsibility. J Bus Ethics 85(3):535–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaltegger S, Hansen EG, Lüdeke-Freund F (2016) Business models for sustainability origins, present research, and future avenues. Organ Environ 29(1):3–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider M (2002) A stakeholder model of organizational leadership. Organ Sci 13(2):209–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma S, Henriques I (2005) Stakeholder influences on sustainability practices in the Canadian forest products industry. Strateg Manag J 26(2):159–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrivastava P (1995) Ecocentric management for a risk society. Acad Manag Rev 20(1):118–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starik M, Kanashiro P (2013) Toward theory of sustainability management: uncovering and integrating the nearly obvious. Organ Environ 26(1):7–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steurer R, Langer ME, Konrad A, Martinuzzi A (2005) Corporations, stakeholders and sustainable development I: a theoretical exploration of business–society relations. J Bus Ethics 61(3):263–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stubbs W, Cocklin C (2008) Conceptualizing a “sustainability business model”. Organ Environ 21(2):103–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suchman MC (1995) Managing legitimacy: strategic and institutional approaches. Acad Manag Rev 20(3):571–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suddaby R, Bitektine A, Haack P (2017) Legitimacy. Acad Manag Ann 11(1):451–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sundaram AK, Inkpen AC (2004) The corporate objective revisited. Organ Sci 15(3):350–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tantalo C, Priem RL (2016) Value creation through stakeholder synergy. Strateg Manag J 37(2):314–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations World Commission on Environment and Development (1987) Our common future. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Wicks AC, Berman SL, Jones TM (1999) The structure of optimal trust: moral and strategic implications. Acad Manag Rev 24(1):99–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Strategic Research Council at the Academy of Finland as part of the project CICAT 2025, Circular Economy Catalysts: From Innovation to Business Ecosystems (Grant number: 320194/320206).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Management and Business, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland

    Riikka Tapaninaho & Johanna Kujala

Authors
  1. Riikka Tapaninaho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Johanna Kujala
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Riikka Tapaninaho .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Roskilde University , Roskilde, Denmark

    Jacob Dahl Rendtorff

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Tapaninaho, R., Kujala, J. (2019). Stakeholder Value Creation: Legitimating Business Sustainability. In: Rendtorff, J. (eds) Handbook of Business Legitimacy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68845-9_31-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68845-9_31-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-68845-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-68845-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation