Skip to main content

Troubling Intersections of Childhood/Animals/Education: Narratives of Love, Life, and Death

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Book cover Research Handbook on Childhoodnature

Part of the book series: Springer International Handbooks of Education ((SIHE))

Abstract

Mapping not only the entanglements in which animals are situated but also our own positions within tangled skeins of humans relationships can be a method of coming to understand the workings of that daunting term intersectionality. (jones, 2015, p. 99)

pattrice jones (2015) entreats us to not only map the entanglements in which animals and humans are situated but to interrogate the intersections of human-animal boundaries and that which demarcates the former from the latter, to see how they support and prop each other up. In this chapter, we trouble the intersections of childhood/animal/education seeking to circulate and disrupt the normalizing ideologies of speciesism that reinforce human exceptionalism and dominion. This chapter contributes to political and ethical conversations in early childhood education (ECE), as we argue that the commodification of nonhuman animals infiltrates educational praxis, in ways that contribute to our epistemological uncertainty as we search for possibilities of animal liberation and the desire to live without places of injustice and violence (White, 2015).

Research with children and their families in an Australian ECE context uncovered stories about life, love, and death. The impression given by these stories is that humanist thinking and anthropocentric viewpoints dominate what parents and teachers share with children and the way they talk about their children’s experiences and retell their own childhood stories that concern relationships with animals. Redefining the human species as one among many offers the potential to not only challenge anthropocentric systems but also attempt to move beyond humanist principles and human-centered ways of relating ethically to the other (human or animal) (Kendall-Morwick, J Mod Lit 36:100–119, 2013; Lévinas, Entre-Nous: On thinking of the other. Columbia University Press, New York, 1997). Theoretical borders are also being tested here as we roam in and out of human, posthuman, and critical theoretical realms playing with old and new ontologies in our search for pedagogical resistance, anarchy, and places without violence. Specifically, we engage “post” methodologies and theories, to pay epistemological and theoretical attention to animal species (Hamilton, Taylor, Ethnography after humanism: Power, politics and method in multi-species research. Palgrave Macmillan, London, 2017).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 599.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 799.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adams, C. J. (1990). The sexual politics of meat. A feminist-vegetarian critical theory. London, England: Bloomsbury Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, C. J. (2014). The war on compassion. In P. MacCormack (Ed.), The animal catalyst: Towards Ahuman theory. London, England: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, C. J., & Gruen, L. (Eds.). (2014). Ecofeminism: Feminist intersections with other animals and the Earth. New York, NY: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birke, L. (2009). Naming names – Or, what’s in it for the animals? Humanimalia: a Journal of Human/animal Interface Studies, 1(1), 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bone, J. (2013). The animal as the fourth educator: A literature review of animals and young children in pedagogical relationships. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 38(2), 57–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braidotti, R. (2015). Nomadic theory: The portable Rosi Braidotti. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briggs, C. (2015). The journey cycles of the Boonwurrung. Melbourne, VIC: Victorian Aboriginal Corporation for Languages.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, M., & Stewart, K. (2014). Our children and other animals: The cultural construction of human-animal relations in childhood. Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(1), 139–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlberg, G., & Moss, P. (2005). Ethics and politics in early childhood education. New York, NY: RoutledgeFalmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (1997). Of grammatology (G. C. Spivak, Trans.). Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press. (Original work published 1967).

    Google Scholar 

  • Despret, V. (2013). Responding bodies and partial affinities in human-animal worlds. Theory, Culture & Society, 30(7), 51–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Despret, V. (2016). What would animals say if we asked the right questions? (B. Buchannan, Trans.). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinker, K. G., & Pedersen, H. (2016). Critical animal pedagogies: Re-learning our relations with animal others. In E. H. Lees & N. Noddings (Eds.), The Palgrave international handbook of alternative education. London, England: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donovon, J. (2006). Feminism and the treatment of animals: From care to dialogue. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 31(2), 305–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, S., & Young, T. (2015). Nature by default in early childhood environmental education. Australian Journal of Environmental Education. Special Issue: 18th Biennial AAEE Conference– Sustainability: Smart Strategies for the 21st Century, 31(2), 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fawcett, L. (2005). Bioregional teaching: How to climb, eat, fall, and learn from porcupines. In L. J. Muzzin & P. Tripp (Eds.), Teaching as activism: Equity meets environmentalism (pp. 269–280). Montreal, PQ: McGill-Queen’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1980). Truth and power. In C. Gordon (Ed.), Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1982). Bio-power. In H. Drefus & P. Rabinow (Eds.), Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabardi, W. (2017). The next social contract: Animals, the anthropocene and biopolitics. Philadelpia, PA: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruen, L. (2015). Entangled empathy: An alternative ethic for our relationships with animals. Brooklyn, NY: Lantern Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, L., & Taylor, N. (2017). Ethnography after humanism: Power, politics and method in multi-species research. London, England: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. (2003). The companion species manifesto: Dogs, people and significant otherness. Chicago, IL: Prickly Paradigm Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. (2006). Encounters with companion species: Entangling dogs, baboons, philosophers, and biologists. Configurations: A Journal of Literature, Science, and Technology (Soc. for Literature and Science; Georgia Inst. of Technology) (Baltimore, MD), 14(1/2), 97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. (2012, October). Cosmopolitan critters, SF and staying with the trouble. Paper presented at the The Humanimal Group at the Centre for Gender Research, Uppsala University, in association with The Critical Cultural Theory Platform at, Södertörn University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. (2013). IHR distinguished lecture. Multispecies cosmopolitics, a new approach to recuperating the planet on which we live. Paper presented at the Institute Humanties Research Arizona State University. http://vimeo.com/62081248.

  • Haraway, D. (2016). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the chthulucene. Durham, NC/London, England: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, A. Y., & Mazzei, L. A. (2012). Thinking with theory in qualitative research. Viewing data across multiple perspectives. Milton Park, Oxen: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • jones, p. (2015). Afterword. In L. Gruen (Ed.), Entangled empathy: An alternative ethic for our relationships with animals. Brooklyn, NY: Lantern Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemmerer, L. (2011a). Theorizing ‘others. In N. Taylor & D. T. Signal (Eds.), Theorizing animals: Re-thinking humanimal relations. Leiden, The Netherlands: Bril.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemmerer, L. (Ed.). (2011b). Sister species, women, animals and social justice. Urbana, IL/Chicago, IL/Springfield, IL: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemmerer, L. (2015). Animals and the environment: Advocacy, activism, and the quest for common ground. Hoboken, NJ: Taylor and Francis.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kheel, M. (2007). Nature ethics: An ecofeminist perspective. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, C. J. (2015). Dangerous crossings: Race, species and nature in a multicultural age. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (2004). Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern. Critical Inquiry, 30(Winter), 225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (2011). Waiting for Gaia. Composing the common world through arts and politics. Paper presented at the The Sciences Po Program in Arts and Politics, London, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Guin, U. (2009). Cheek by jowl: Talks and essays on how and why fantasy matters. Seattle, WA: Aqueduct Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorimar, H. (2010). Forces of nature, forms of life: Calibrating ethology and phenomenology. In B. Anderson & P. Harrison (Eds.), Taking place: Non-representational theories and geography. London, England: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacCormack, P. (2013). Gracious pedagogy. Journal of Curriculum and Pedagogy, 10(1), 13–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacCormack, P. (Ed.). (2014). The animal catalyst: Towards a human theory. London, England: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murris, K. (2016). The Posthuman child: Educational transformation through philosophy with picturebooks. Abingdon, UK: Taylor & Francis.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, G. (2007). The significance of children and animals: Social development and our connections to other species (2nd ed.). West Lafayette, Indiana: Purdue University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nxumalo, F., & Pacini-Ketchabaw, V. (2017). ‘Staying with the trouble’ in child-insect-educator common worlds. Environmental Education Research, 23, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2017.1325447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, K. (2010). Animal ethics: Towards an ethics of responsiveness. Research in Phenomenology, 40(269), 267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osgood, J. (2017). Opening Pandora’s box: Postmodernist perspectives of childhood. In S. Powell & K. Smith (Eds.), An introduction to early childhood studies (Vol. 4). London, England: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pacini-Ketchabaw, V., & Taylor, A. (2015). Unsettling pedagogies through common world encounters: Grappling with (post)colonial legacies in Canadian forests and Australian bushlands. In V. Pacini-Ketchabaw & A. Taylor (Eds.), Unsettling the colonialist places and spaces of early childhood education (pp. 63–91). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pacini-Ketchabaw, V., & Taylor, A. (2015b). Learning with children, ants, and worms in the Anthropocene: towards a common world pedagogy of multispecies vulnerability. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 23(4), 507–529.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, C. (2001). Taming the wild profusion of existing things? A study of Foucault, power and human/animal relationships. Environmental Ethics, 23(4), 339–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payne, P. (2017). Ecopedagogy and radical pedagogy: Post-critical transgressions in environmental and geography education. The Journal of Environmental Education, 48(2), 130–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, H. (2011). Animals and education research: Enclosures and openings. In P. R. Segerdahl (Ed.), Undisciplined animals: Invitations to animal studies (pp. 11–26). Newcastle-Upon-Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, H., & Pini, B. (2017). Educational epistemologies and methods in a more-than-human world. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 49(11), 1051–1054. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2016.1199925

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pederson, H. (2010a). Animals in schools: Processes and strategies in human-animal education. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pederson, H. (2010b). Is ‘the posthuman’ educable? On the convergence of educational philosophy, animal studies, and posthumanist theory. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 31(2), 237–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596301003679750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pederson, H. (2017). Learning to change the system from within? Two cases of education for animal liberation. How can education institutions become spaces for activism and resistance against animal exploitation? Two activist-students show us the way. Animal Liberation Currents, January.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plumwood, V. (1993). Feminism and the mastery of nature. London, England: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rautio, P. (2013). Children who carry stones in their pockets: On autotelic material practices in everyday life. Children’s Geographies, 11(4), 394–408. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2013.812278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rooney, T. (2016). Weather worlding: learning with the elements in early childhood. Environmental Education Research, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2016.1217398

  • Rowe, B. (2012). Food, habit, and the consumption of animals as educational encounter. In C. Ruitenberg (Ed.), Philosophy of education. Urbana, IL: Philosophy of Education Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, B. (2016). Challenging anthropocentrism in education: Posthumanist intersectionality and eating animals as gastro-aesthetic pedagogy. In S. Rice & A. G. Rud (Eds.), The educational significance of human and non-human animal interactions: Blurring the species line. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryder, R. (1970/2010). Speciesism Again: the original leaflet. Critical Society Spring (2), 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryder, R. (2013). Richard Ryder on speciesism, from http://www.veganism.com/richard-ryder-on-speciesism/.

  • Snaza, N. (2013). Bewildering education. Journal of Curriculum and Pedagogy, 10(1), 38–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/15505170.2013.783889

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snaza, N. (2015a). The failure of humanizing education in Kazuo Ishiguro’s never let me go. Literature Interpretation Theory, 26(3), 215–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snaza, N. (2015b). Towards a genealogy of educational humanism. In N. Snaza & J. Weaver (Eds.), Posthumanism and educational research. Hoboken, NJ: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snaza, N., & Weaver, J. (2015). Posthumanism and Educational Research. Retrieved from http://swin.eblib.com.au/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=1794277.

  • Stewart, K., & Cole, M. (2009). The conceptual separation of food and animals in childhood. Food, Culture & Society, 12(4), 457–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, A. (2013). Reconfiguring the natures of childhood. Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, A. (2014). Situated and entangled childhoods: Imagining and materializing children’s common world relations. In M. Block, E. Blue Swadner, & G. Canella (Eds.), Reconceptualizing early childhood care and education: Critical questions, new imaginaries and social activism (pp. 121–130). New York, NY: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, A. (2017a). Beyond stewardship: Common world pedagogies for the Anthropocene. Environmental Education Research, 23, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2017.1325452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, A., & Blaise, M. (2014). Queer worlding childhood. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 35(3), 377–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2014.888842

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, N. (2017b). A sociology for other animals. Paper presented at the Development for Species: Animals in Society, Animals as Society, Melbourne, VIC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Twine, R. (2010). Intersectional disgust? – Animals and (eco) feminism. Feminism & Psychology, 20(3), 397–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uexküll, J. v. (1934/2010). A foray into the worlds of animals and humans, with a theory of meaning. (J. D. O’Neil, Trans.). Minneapolis, MN: University of Monnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wadiwel, D. (2015). The war against animals. Leiden, Netherlands/Boston, MA: Brill Rodopi.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wallin, J. (2014). Dark pedagogy. In P. MacCormack (Ed.), The animal catalyst: Towards Ahuman theory. London, England: Bloomsbury Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, K. (1999). Environmental justice: Some ecofeminist worries about a distributive model. Environmental Ethics, 21(2), 151–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weis, J. S. (2012). Walking sideways: The remarkable world of crabs. Ithaca, New York: Comstock Publishing Associates.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Weitzenfeld, A., & Joy, M. (2014). An overview of anthropocentrism, humanism, and speciesism in critical animal theory. In A. J. Nocella III, J. Sorenson, K. Socha, & A. Matsuka (Eds.), Defining critical animal studies: An intersectional social justice approach for liberation (pp. 3–27). New York, NY: Peter Lang Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wohlleben, P. (2017). The inner life of animals: Surprising observations of a hidden world. London, England: Vintage Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, T. (2010). The crack where the light gets in: An examination of sustainable education in early childhood education (Master of Education (Research)). Monash University, Melbourne, VIC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, T., Clancy, C., & Ahern, P. (2015). Shining an ethical light on egg-hatching programs. Every Child, 21(3), 38–39.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tracy Young .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Young, T., Bone, J. (2020). Troubling Intersections of Childhood/Animals/Education: Narratives of Love, Life, and Death. In: Cutter-Mackenzie-Knowles, A., Malone, K., Barratt Hacking, E. (eds) Research Handbook on Childhoodnature . Springer International Handbooks of Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67286-1_73

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics