Abstract
An economic perspective adds crucial insight into research on intimate partner violence (IPV) across theoretical, practical, and methodological dimensions. Three key economic considerations for IPV scholars are presented in this chapter, including: household bargaining models, economic characteristics and their contested roles as protective or risk factors, and the economic costs and consequences of IPV. Economic models of household bargaining have been adapted to incorporate IPV and help introduce the economic approach to IPV research. This chapter provides a brief overview of such models, their assumptions and resulting predictions regarding IPV, and finally, some of their limitations. Predictions from such models sparked empirical research on the role of economic characteristics in mitigating the risk for violence. Despite theoretical predictions, economic empowerment is not universally protective. An overview of results from research on two forms of economic empowerment – employment and asset ownership – is included as is discussion on the role social norms may play in mediating the protective effects of economic empowerment. Finally, this chapter includes an outline of the economic costs and consequences of IPV. Direct, indirect, and intangible costs resulting from IPV are detailed, as well as the various categories into which such costs fall, including costs to the justice system and healthcare system. Methodologies for estimating indirect costs, in particular, are explained including the human capital approach and willingness-to-pay method. Many of these costs continue past the period of abuse, accruing at both the macroeconomic level, affecting overall economic growth, and at the individual level, by interrupting educational and employment trajectories.
This chapter was initially published with an incorrect copyright holder name. It has been corrected to © Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
References
Access Economics. (2004). The cost of domestic violence to the Australian economy. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.
Agarwal, B. (1997). “Bargaining” and gender relations: Within and beyond the household. Feminist Economics, 3(1), 1–51.
Bachman, R., & Saltzman, L. E. (1995). Violence against women: Estimates from the redesigned Survey (NCJ-154348). Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report. U.S. Department of Justice.
Banyard, V. L., & Cross, C. (2008). Consequences of teen dating violence. Violence Against Women, 14(9), 998–1013.
Becker, G. (1965). A theory of the allocation of time. The Economic Journal, 75(299), 493–517.
Becker, G. S. (1981). A treatise on the family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Benería, L., Berik, G., & Floro, M. (2015). Gender, development, and globalization: Economics as if all people mattered (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
Benson, M. L., Fox, G. L., DeMaris, A., & Van Wyk, J. (2003). Neighborhood disadvantage, individual economic distress and violence against women in intimate relationships. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 19(3), 207–235.
Bhattacharya, H. (2015). Spousal violence and women’s employment in India. Feminist Economics, 21(2), 30–52.
Bhattacharyya, M., Bedi, A. S., & Chhachhi, A. (2011). Marital violence and women’s employment and property status: Evidence from north Indian villages. World Development, 39(9), 1676–1689.
Bonomi, A. E., Trabert, B., Anderson, M. L., Kernic, M. A., & Holt, V. L. (2014). Intimate partner violence and neighborhood income: A longitudinal analysis. Violence Against Women, 20(1), 42–58.
Bueno, C. C., & Henderson, E. A. (2017). Bargaining or backlash? Evidence on intimate partner violence from the Dominican Republic. Feminist Economics, 23(4), 90–116.
Cunradi, C. B., Caetano, R., & Schafer, J. (2002). Socioeconomic predictors of intimate partner violence among white, black, and Hispanic couples in the United States. Journal of Family Violence, 17(4), 377–389.
Day, T., McKenna, K., & Bowlus, A. (2005). The economic costs of ciolence against women: An evaluation of the literature. Expert brief compiled in preparation for the secretary-general’s in-depth study on all forms of violence against women, United Nations. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/vaw/expert%20brief%20costs.pdf
Diette, T. M., Goldsmith, A. H., Hamilton, D., & Darity, W. A., Jr. (2017). Child abuse, sexual assault, community violence and high school graduation. Review of Behavioral Economics, 4(3), 215–240.
Dugan, L., Nagin, D. S., & Rosenfeld, R. (1999). Explaining the decline in intimate partner homicide: The effects of changing domesticity, women’s status, and domestic violence resources. Homicide Studies, 3(3), 187–214.
Duvvury, N., Nguyen, M., & Carney, P. (2012). Estimating the cost of domestic violence against women in Vietnam. Hanoi: UN Women.
Duvvury, N., Callan, A., Carney, P., & Raghavendra, S. (2013). Intimate partner violence: Economic costs and implications for growth and development. Women’s voice, agency and participation research series working paper 82532, World Bank.
Eisenberg, J. M. (1989). Clinical economics: A guide to the economic analysis of clinical practices. JAMA, 262(20), 2879–2886.
Farmer, A., & Tiefenthaler, J. (1997). An economic analysis of domestic violence. Review of Social Economy, 55(3), 337–358.
Fishman, P. A., Bonomi, A. E., Anderson, M. L., Reid, R. J., & Rivara, F. P. (2010). Changes in health care costs over time following the cessation of intimate partner violence. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 25(9), 920–925.
Halpern, C. T., Oslak, S. G., Young, M. L., Martin, S. L., & Kupper, L. L. (2001). Partner violence among adolescents in opposite-sex romantic relationships: Findings from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health. American Journal of Public Health, 91(10), 1679–1685.
Jewkes, R. (2002). Intimate partner violence: Causes and prevention. The Lancet, 359, 1423–1429.
Kabeer, N. (1999). Resources, agency, achievements: Reflections on the measurement of women’s empowerment. Development and Change, 30, 435–464.
Katz, E. (1997). The intra-household economics of voice and exit. Feminist Economics, 3(3), 25–46.
Kishor, S., & Johnson, K. (2004). Profiling violence: A multi-country study (pp. 53–63). Calverton: Measures DHS, ORC Marco.
Krebs, C., Lindquist, C. H., Warner, T. D., Fisher, B. S., & Martin, S. L. (2007). The Campus Sexual Assualt (CSA) Study. Washington, DC. Retrieved from https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/221153.pdf
LeBlanc, M. M., Barling, J., & Turner, N. (2014). Intimate partner aggression and women’s work outcomes. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 19(4), 399–412.
Lenze, J., & Klasen, S. (2017). Does women’s labor force participation reduce domestic violence? Evidence from Jordan. Feminist Economics, 23(1), 1–29.
Lundberg, S., & Pollak, R. A. (1993). Separate spheres bargaining and the marriage market. Journal of Political Economy, 101(6), 988–1010.
Macmillan, R., & Gartner, R. (1999). When she brings home the bacon: Labor-force participation and the risk of spousal violence against women. Journal of Marriage and Family, 61(4), 947–958.
Manser, M., & Brown, M. (1980). Marriage and household decision-making: A bargaining analysis. International Economic Review, 21(1), 31–44.
McElroy, M. B., & Horney, M. J. (1981). Nash-bargained household decisions: Toward a generalization of the theory of demand. International Economic Review, 22(2), 333–349.
Nash, J. (1950). The bargaining problem. Econometrica, 18(2), 155–162.
National Center for Injury Prevention and Control. (2003). Costs of intimate partner violence against women in the United States. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/IPVBook-a.pdf
Oduro, A. D., Deere, C. D., & Catanzarite, Z. B. (2015). Women’s wealth and intimate partner violence: Insights from Ecuador and Ghana. Feminist Economics, 21(2), 1–29.
Panda, P., & Agarwal, B. (2005). Marital violence, human development and women’s property status in India. World Development, 33(5), 823–850.
Peterman, A., Pereira, A., Bleck, J., Palermo, T. M., & Yount, K. M. (2017). Women’s individual asset ownership and experience of intimate partner violence: Evidence from 28 international surveys. American Journal of Public Health, 107(5), 747–755.
Peterson, C., Liu, Y., Kresnow, M., Florence, C., Merrick, M. T., DeGue, S., & Lokey, C. N. (2018a). Short-term lost productivity per victim: Intimate partner violence, sexual violence, or stalking. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 55(1), 106–110.
Peterson, C., Kearns, M. C., McIntosh, W. L., Estefan, L. F., Nicolaidis, C., McCollister, K. E., Gordon, A., & Florence, C. (2018b). Lifetime economic burden of intimate partner violence among U.S. adults. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 55(4), 433–444.
Pollak, R. A. (2005). Bargaining power in marriage: Earnings, wage rates and household production. Cambridge, MA: NBER Working Paper Series.
Raghavendra, S., Duvvury, N., & Ashe, S. (2017). The macroeconomic loss due to violence against women: The case of Vietnam. Feminist Economics, 23(4), 62–89.
Rees, D. I., & Sabia, J. J. (2013). Forced intercourse, mental health, and human capital. Southern Economic Journal, 80(2), 324–344.
Sabina, C. (2013). Individual and national level associations between economic deprivation and partner violence among college students in 31 national settings. Aggressive Behavior, 39(4), 247–256.
Saltzman, L. E., Johnson, C. H., Gilbert, B. C., & Goodwin, M. M. (2003). Physical abuse around the time of pregnancy: An examination of prevalence and risk factors in 16 states. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 7(1), 31–43.
Seiz, J. A. (2004). Game theory and bargaining models. In J. Peterson & M. Lewis (Eds.), The elgar companion to feminist economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Sen, A. (1987). Gender and cooperative conflicts (Wider working papers 18). Helsinki: Wider.
Shobe, M. A., & Dienemann, J. (2007). Intimate partner violence in the United States: An ecological approach to prevention and treatment. Social Policy & Society, 7(2), 185–195.
Straus, M. A., Gelles, R. J., & Steinmetz, S. K. (1980). Behind closed doors: Violence in the American family. Garden City: Anchor Books.
Strenio, J. (2018) The economic consequences of intimate partner violence over the life cycle. Doctoral dissertation.
Tamborini, C. R., Kim, C. H., & Sakamoto, A. (2015). Education and lifetime earnings in the United States. Demography, 52(4), 1383–1407.
Vivolo-Kantor, A. M., Olsen, E. O. M., & Bacon, S. (2016). Associations of teen dating violence victimization with school violence and bullying among US high school students. Journal of School Health, 86(8), 620–627.
Vyas, S. (2012). Assessing the implications of women’s economic status on intimate partner violence in Dar es Salaam and Mbeya, Tanzania. Doctoral dissertation, ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
Vyas, S., & Watts, C. (2009). How does economic empowerment affect women’s risk of intimate partner violence in low and middle income countries? A systematic review of published literature. Journal of International Development, 21, 577–602.
Vyas, S., Mbwambo, J., & Heise, L. (2015). Women’s paid work and intimate partner violence: Insights from Tanzania. Feminist Economics, 21(1), 35–58.
Walby, S. (2009). The cost of domestic violence: Up-date 2009. Retrieved from https://www.lancaster.ac.uk/fass/doc_library/…/Cost_of_domestic_violence_update.doc
Wilczak, A. (2014). The relationship between youth violence, victimization, and educational outcomes. Sociology Mind, 4(4), 328–340.
Wilson, N. (2018). Violence against female adolescents in low- and middle-income countries: Evidence from 36 national household surveys. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, pp 1–15.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Strenio, J. (2019). Economic Considerations of Intimate Partner Violence. In: Geffner, R., White, J.W., Hamberger, L.K., Rosenbaum, A., Vaughan-Eden, V., Vieth, V.I. (eds) Handbook of Interpersonal Violence and Abuse Across the Lifespan. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62122-7_167-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62122-7_167-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-62122-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-62122-7
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences