Skip to main content

Feedback for Enhanced English Language Learning

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Second Handbook of English Language Teaching

Part of the book series: Springer International Handbooks of Education ((SIHE))

  • 509 Accesses

Abstract

When effectively provided, feedback can be an immensely powerful engine for improving learning. Through illustrations of classroom practice, this chapter examines what constitutes effective feedback in the context of language learning. Specifically, the chapter focuses on how teachers can enhance K-12 English language learner students’ language development during subject matter learning through the provision of feedback in the context of formative assessment. The knowledge and skills teachers need for this purpose is also considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Andersson C, Palm T (2017) The impact of formative assessment on student achievement: a study of the effects of changes to classroom practice after a comprehensive professional development programme. Learn Instr 49:92–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey AL, Heritage M (2008) Formative assessment for literacy, grades K-6: building reading and academic language skills across the curriculum. Corwin, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey AL, Heritage M (2014) The role of language learning progressions in improved instruction and assessment of English language learners. TESOL Q 48(3):480–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey AL, Heritage M (2018a) Progressing language day by day. Corwin, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey AL, Heritage M (2018b) Self-regulation: the role of language and formative assessment. Harvard Education Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Bangert-Drowns RL, Kulik CLC, Kulik JA, Morgan M (1991) The instructional effect of feedback in test-like events. Rev Educ Res 61(2):213–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bitchener J, Ferris DR (2012) Written corrective feedback in second language acquisition and writing. Routledge, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Black P, Wiliam D (1998) Assessment and classroom learning. Assess Educ Princ Policy Pract 5:7–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Black P, Harrison C, Lee C, Marshall B, Wiliam D (2003) Assessment for learning: putting it into practice. Open University Press, Berkshire

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown GT, Harris LR (2013) Student self-assessment. In: McMillan JH (ed) The SAGE handbook of research on classroom assessment. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 367–393

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Carless D (2015) Excellence in university assessment: learning from award-winning practice. Routledge, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Carless D, Salter D, Yang M, Lam J (2011) Developing sustainable feedback practices. Stud High Educ 36(4):395–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark I (2012) Formative assessment: assessment is for self-regulated learning. Educ Psychol Rev 24(2):205–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crooks TJ (1988) The impact of classroom evaluation practices on students. Rev Educ Res 58:438–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dumont HD, Istance D, Benavides F (eds) (2010) The nature of learning: using research to inspire practice. OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264086487-en

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis R (2009) Corrective feedback and teacher development. L2 J 1(1):3–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hakuta K, Santos M (eds) (2012) Understanding language: commissioned papers on language and literacy issues in the Common Core State Standards and Next Generation Science Standards. Stanford University, Palo Alto

    Google Scholar 

  • Hattie J, Timperley H (2007) The power of feedback. Rev Educ Res 77(1):81–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heritage M (2016) Assessment for learning: co-regulation in and as student-teacher interactions. In: Laveault D, Allal VL (eds) Assessment for learning: meeting the challenge of implementation. Springer, New York, pp 327–343

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Heritage M, Kim J, Vendlinski T, Herman J (2009) From evidence to action: a seamless process in formative assessment? Educ Meas Issues Pract 28(3):24–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heritage M, Walqui A, Linquanti R (2015) English language learners and the new standards: developing language, content knowledge, and analytical practices in the classroom. Harvard Education Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Hymes DH (1972) On communicative competence. In: Pride JB, Holmes J (eds) Sociolinguistics: selected readings. Penguin, Harmondsworth, pp 269–293

    Google Scholar 

  • James JH, Kobe J, Zhao X (2017) Examining the role of trust in shaping children’s approaches to peer dialogue. Teach Coll Rec 119(10):1–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Jefferson G (1987) On exposed and embedded correction in conversation. In: Button G, Lee JRE (eds) Talk and social organization. Multilingual Matters, Clevedon, pp 86–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingston N, Nash B (2011) Formative assessment: a meta-analysis and a call for research. Educ Meas Issues Pract 30(4):28–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kluger AN, DeNisi A (1996) The effects of feedback interventions on performance: a historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychol Bull 119(2): 254–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulhavy RW (1977) Feedback in written instruction. Rev Educ Res 47(2):211–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsen-Freeman D (2013) Transfer of learning transformed. Lang Learn 63(Suppl 1):107–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levinson SC (2013) Action formation and ascription. In: Sidnell J, Stivers T (eds) Handbook of conversation analysis. Wiley-Blackwell, Boston, pp 103–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Narciss S (2008) Feedback strategies for interactive learning tasks. In: Jonassen DH (ed) Handbook of research on educational communications and technology, 3rd edn. Routledge, New York, pp 125–144

    Google Scholar 

  • National Center for Education Statistics (2014) PISA data explorer. http://nces.ed.gov/surveys/pisa/idepisa/

  • National Center for Education Statistics (2015) The nation’s report card: 2015 mathematics and reading assessments (NCES 2015–136). National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (2012) Education for life and work: developing transferable knowledge and skills in the 21st century. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholas H, Lightbown PM, Spada N (2001) Recasts as feedback to language learners. Lang Learn 51(4):719–758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicol DJ, Macfarlane-Dick D (2006) Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Stud High Educ 31(2):199–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Otero V (2006) Moving beyond the “get it or don’t” conception of formative assessment. J Teach Educ 57(3):247–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paris SG, Paris AH (2001) Classroom applications of research on self-regulated learning. Educ Psychol 36(2):89–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paris SG, Winograd P (1990) How metacognition can promote academic learning and instruction. In: Jones BF, Idol L (eds) North Central Regional Educational Laboratory, vol 1. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Hillside: New Jersey, pp 15–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Pekrun R, Goetz T, Titz W, Perry RP (2002) Academic emotions in students’ self-regulated learning and achievement: a program of qualitative and quantitative research. Educ Psychol 37(2): 91–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadler DR (1989) Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instr Sci 18(2): 119–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schleppegrell MJ (2004) The language of schooling: a functional linguistics perspective. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shute VJ (2008) Focus on formative feedback. Rev Educ Res 78(1):153–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song SH, Keller JM (2001) Effectiveness of motivationally adaptive computer-assisted instruction on the dynamic aspects of motivation. Educ Technol Res Dev 49(2):5–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spada N, Lightbown PM (1999) Instruction, first language influence, and developmental readiness in second language acquisition. Mod Lang J 83(1):1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Maele D, Van Houtte M, Forsyth P (2014) Introduction: trust as a matter of equity and excellence in education. In: Van Maele D, Forsyth P, Van Houtte M (eds) Trust and school life. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 1–33

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Walqui A, van Lier L (2010) Scaffolding the academic success of adolescent English language learners: a pedagogy of promise. WestEd, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells G (1994) The complementary contributions of Halliday and Vygotsky to a “language-based theory of learning”. Linguist Educ 6(1):41–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiliam D (2013) Feedback and instructional correctives. In: McMillan JH (ed) The SAGE handbook of research on classroom assessment. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 197–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman BJ (2002) Becoming a self-regulated learner: an overview. Theory Pract 41(2):64–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Margaret Heritage .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Heritage, M. (2019). Feedback for Enhanced English Language Learning. In: Gao, X. (eds) Second Handbook of English Language Teaching. Springer International Handbooks of Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58542-0_27-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58542-0_27-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-58542-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-58542-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education

Publish with us

Policies and ethics