Abstract
When effectively provided, feedback can be an immensely powerful engine for improving learning. Through illustrations of classroom practice, this chapter examines what constitutes effective feedback in the context of language learning. Specifically, the chapter focuses on how teachers can enhance K-12 English language learner students’ language development during subject matter learning through the provision of feedback in the context of formative assessment. The knowledge and skills teachers need for this purpose is also considered.
References
Andersson C, Palm T (2017) The impact of formative assessment on student achievement: a study of the effects of changes to classroom practice after a comprehensive professional development programme. Learn Instr 49:92–102
Bailey AL, Heritage M (2008) Formative assessment for literacy, grades K-6: building reading and academic language skills across the curriculum. Corwin, Thousand Oaks
Bailey AL, Heritage M (2014) The role of language learning progressions in improved instruction and assessment of English language learners. TESOL Q 48(3):480–506
Bailey AL, Heritage M (2018a) Progressing language day by day. Corwin, Thousand Oaks
Bailey AL, Heritage M (2018b) Self-regulation: the role of language and formative assessment. Harvard Education Press, Cambridge, MA
Bangert-Drowns RL, Kulik CLC, Kulik JA, Morgan M (1991) The instructional effect of feedback in test-like events. Rev Educ Res 61(2):213–238
Bitchener J, Ferris DR (2012) Written corrective feedback in second language acquisition and writing. Routledge, New York
Black P, Wiliam D (1998) Assessment and classroom learning. Assess Educ Princ Policy Pract 5:7–73
Black P, Harrison C, Lee C, Marshall B, Wiliam D (2003) Assessment for learning: putting it into practice. Open University Press, Berkshire
Brown GT, Harris LR (2013) Student self-assessment. In: McMillan JH (ed) The SAGE handbook of research on classroom assessment. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 367–393
Carless D (2015) Excellence in university assessment: learning from award-winning practice. Routledge, London
Carless D, Salter D, Yang M, Lam J (2011) Developing sustainable feedback practices. Stud High Educ 36(4):395–407
Clark I (2012) Formative assessment: assessment is for self-regulated learning. Educ Psychol Rev 24(2):205–249
Crooks TJ (1988) The impact of classroom evaluation practices on students. Rev Educ Res 58:438–481
Dumont HD, Istance D, Benavides F (eds) (2010) The nature of learning: using research to inspire practice. OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264086487-en
Ellis R (2009) Corrective feedback and teacher development. L2 J 1(1):3–18
Hakuta K, Santos M (eds) (2012) Understanding language: commissioned papers on language and literacy issues in the Common Core State Standards and Next Generation Science Standards. Stanford University, Palo Alto
Hattie J, Timperley H (2007) The power of feedback. Rev Educ Res 77(1):81–112
Heritage M (2016) Assessment for learning: co-regulation in and as student-teacher interactions. In: Laveault D, Allal VL (eds) Assessment for learning: meeting the challenge of implementation. Springer, New York, pp 327–343
Heritage M, Kim J, Vendlinski T, Herman J (2009) From evidence to action: a seamless process in formative assessment? Educ Meas Issues Pract 28(3):24–31
Heritage M, Walqui A, Linquanti R (2015) English language learners and the new standards: developing language, content knowledge, and analytical practices in the classroom. Harvard Education Press, Cambridge, MA
Hymes DH (1972) On communicative competence. In: Pride JB, Holmes J (eds) Sociolinguistics: selected readings. Penguin, Harmondsworth, pp 269–293
James JH, Kobe J, Zhao X (2017) Examining the role of trust in shaping children’s approaches to peer dialogue. Teach Coll Rec 119(10):1–34
Jefferson G (1987) On exposed and embedded correction in conversation. In: Button G, Lee JRE (eds) Talk and social organization. Multilingual Matters, Clevedon, pp 86–100
Kingston N, Nash B (2011) Formative assessment: a meta-analysis and a call for research. Educ Meas Issues Pract 30(4):28–37
Kluger AN, DeNisi A (1996) The effects of feedback interventions on performance: a historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychol Bull 119(2): 254–284
Kulhavy RW (1977) Feedback in written instruction. Rev Educ Res 47(2):211–232
Larsen-Freeman D (2013) Transfer of learning transformed. Lang Learn 63(Suppl 1):107–129
Levinson SC (2013) Action formation and ascription. In: Sidnell J, Stivers T (eds) Handbook of conversation analysis. Wiley-Blackwell, Boston, pp 103–130
Narciss S (2008) Feedback strategies for interactive learning tasks. In: Jonassen DH (ed) Handbook of research on educational communications and technology, 3rd edn. Routledge, New York, pp 125–144
National Center for Education Statistics (2014) PISA data explorer. http://nces.ed.gov/surveys/pisa/idepisa/
National Center for Education Statistics (2015) The nation’s report card: 2015 mathematics and reading assessments (NCES 2015–136). National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC
National Research Council (2012) Education for life and work: developing transferable knowledge and skills in the 21st century. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC
Nicholas H, Lightbown PM, Spada N (2001) Recasts as feedback to language learners. Lang Learn 51(4):719–758
Nicol DJ, Macfarlane-Dick D (2006) Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Stud High Educ 31(2):199–218
Otero V (2006) Moving beyond the “get it or don’t” conception of formative assessment. J Teach Educ 57(3):247–255
Paris SG, Paris AH (2001) Classroom applications of research on self-regulated learning. Educ Psychol 36(2):89–101
Paris SG, Winograd P (1990) How metacognition can promote academic learning and instruction. In: Jones BF, Idol L (eds) North Central Regional Educational Laboratory, vol 1. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Hillside: New Jersey, pp 15–51
Pekrun R, Goetz T, Titz W, Perry RP (2002) Academic emotions in students’ self-regulated learning and achievement: a program of qualitative and quantitative research. Educ Psychol 37(2): 91–105
Sadler DR (1989) Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instr Sci 18(2): 119–144
Schleppegrell MJ (2004) The language of schooling: a functional linguistics perspective. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah
Shute VJ (2008) Focus on formative feedback. Rev Educ Res 78(1):153–189
Song SH, Keller JM (2001) Effectiveness of motivationally adaptive computer-assisted instruction on the dynamic aspects of motivation. Educ Technol Res Dev 49(2):5–22
Spada N, Lightbown PM (1999) Instruction, first language influence, and developmental readiness in second language acquisition. Mod Lang J 83(1):1–22
Van Maele D, Van Houtte M, Forsyth P (2014) Introduction: trust as a matter of equity and excellence in education. In: Van Maele D, Forsyth P, Van Houtte M (eds) Trust and school life. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 1–33
Walqui A, van Lier L (2010) Scaffolding the academic success of adolescent English language learners: a pedagogy of promise. WestEd, San Francisco
Wells G (1994) The complementary contributions of Halliday and Vygotsky to a “language-based theory of learning”. Linguist Educ 6(1):41–90
Wiliam D (2013) Feedback and instructional correctives. In: McMillan JH (ed) The SAGE handbook of research on classroom assessment. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 197–214
Zimmerman BJ (2002) Becoming a self-regulated learner: an overview. Theory Pract 41(2):64–70
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Heritage, M. (2019). Feedback for Enhanced English Language Learning. In: Gao, X. (eds) Second Handbook of English Language Teaching. Springer International Handbooks of Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58542-0_27-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58542-0_27-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-58542-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-58542-0
eBook Packages: Springer Reference EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education