Skip to main content

Discovery

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
  • 5 Accesses

Definition

In every jurisdiction, the rules of evidence permit attorneys to obtain information on the basis of the opinions of the expert witnesses. The process of examining information from the expert witness presented by the opposition is referred to as discovery. In both civil and criminal litigation, discovery rights are always imposed; thus, each expert witness is subject to this process. Discovery rules in most states are based on the Federal Rules of Evidence (FRE). While discovery is intended to collect information, it also serves to narrow or refine disputes regarding critical issues. In the case of forensic neuropsychologists serving as expert witnesses, it is often the case that one’s entire file (e.g., interview notes, raw test scores, behavioral observations, etc.) be provided to the opposing counsel (or at least to their own retained neuropsychologist expert). Matarazzo (1990) outlined multiple types of raw data scrutinized during discovery including: (1) written...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   899.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   1,099.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References and Readings

  • (1975). Federal rules of evidence for United States courts and magistrates. St. Paul: West Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greiffenstein, M. F., & Cohen, L. (2005). Neuropsychology and the law: Principles of productive attorney-neuropsychologist relations. In G. Larrabee (Ed.), Forensic neuropsychology: A scientific approach. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matarazzo, J. D. (1990). Psychological assessment versus psychological testing: Validation from Binet to the school, clinic, and courtroom. American Psychologist, 45, 999–1017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melton, G. B., Petrila, J., Poythress, N. G., & Slobogin, C. (2007). Psychological evaluations for the courts (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Moira C. Dux .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Dux, M.C. (2018). Discovery. In: Kreutzer, J.S., DeLuca, J., Caplan, B. (eds) Encyclopedia of Clinical Neuropsychology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57111-9_969

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics