Abstract
Plant cell and tissue cultures represent a suitable alternative as production systems for valuable plant secondary metabolites. Unlike traditional extraction from agricultural grown plants, the active ingredient production in biotechnological processes with in vitro cultures takes place in closed bioreactors under controlled conditions. This allows a year-round production with constant quality and quantity. However, the development of biotechnological processes with plant in vitro cultures is often time-consuming and requires parallelized screening systems. Furthermore, the design, optimization, and control of economic processes presuppose knowledge about the physiological state of the biological system and the kinetic parameters of biomass and product formation. To gain access to these data, suitable process-monitoring methods are required which provide information about the physiology of the process, both on a macroscopic and on the single cell level. However, due to the morphology of plant cell and tissue cultures, many methods for bioprocess monitoring that are used for mammalian and microbial cultures are not applicable. This chapter covers methods that are appropriate for monitoring of biotechnological processes with plant cell and tissue cultures: The conductivity of the growth medium is a powerful parameter to estimate the growth of complex plant cell aggregates and tissue structures. The next section describes the application of the RAMOS – a small scale cultivation system – for heterotrophic and phototrophic plant cell and tissue cultures. Flow cytometry is a tool to obtain segregated data of bioprocesses. Further, we describe a novel approach of cell immobilization for physiological studies and the design of bioprocesses, the 3D Green Bioprinting.
Keywords
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsAbbreviations
- 2,4-D:
-
2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid
- BrdU:
-
Bromodeoxyuridine
- CAD:
-
Computer-aided design
- CAM:
-
Computer-aided manufacturing
- cbulk:
-
Concentration of substrates/products in culture medium [g l−1]
- CLSM:
-
Confocal laser scanning microscopy
- cpore:
-
Concentration of substrates/products in a hydrogel pore [g l−1]
- cs:
-
Cell suspension culture
- CT:
-
Carbon dioxide transfer [mmol l−1]
- CTR:
-
Carbon dioxide transfer rate [mmol l−1 h−1]
- CTRev:
-
Evaporation-corrected carbon dioxide transfer rate [mmol l−1 h−1]
- ctrmax:
-
Maximum biomass-specific carbon dioxide transfer rate [mmol g−1 h−1]
- CTRmax:
-
Maximum carbon dioxide transfer rate [mmol l−1 h−1]
- C-value:
-
DNA content of the holoploid genome with chromosome number n
- Cx-value:
-
DNA content of the monoploid genome with chromosome number x
- DW:
-
Concentration of biomass dry weight [g l−1]
- DWmax:
-
Maximum concentration of biomass dry weight [g l−1]
- EdU:
-
5-Ethynyl-2′-deoxyuridine
- Fev:
-
Rate of evaporation [ml h−1]
- FUCCI:
-
Fluorescent ubiquitination-based cell-cycle indicator
- G0/G1 phase:
-
Cell cycle phase
- G2/M phase:
-
Cell cycle phase
- HPLC:
-
High performance liquid chromatography
- hr:
-
Hairy root culture(s)
- LED:
-
Light emitting diode(s)
- LS:
-
Linsmaier and Skoog medium
- MS:
-
Murashige and Skoog medium
- MTT:
-
3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide
- n:
-
Nuclear phase status:
n – means the chromosome number of the meiotically reduced genome irrespective of the ploidy
2n – means the chromosome number of the non-reduced genome
- N:
-
Number of data points
- OLED:
-
Organic light emitting diode(s)
- OT:
-
Oxygen transfer [mmol l−1]
- OTR:
-
Oxygen transfer rate [mmol l−1 h−1]
- OTRev:
-
Evaporation-corrected oxygen transfer rate [mmol l−1 h−1]
- otrmax:
-
Maximum biomass-specific oxygen transfer rate [mmol g−1 h−1]
- OTRmax:
-
Maximum oxygen transfer rate [mmol l−1 h−1]
- OU:
-
Oxygen uptake [mmol l−1]
- OUR:
-
Oxygen uptake rate [mmol l−1 h−1]
- p:
-
Overall pressure [bar]
- PAR:
-
Photosynthetic active radiation
- PBR:
-
Photobioreactor(s)
- \( {\mathrm{p}}_{{\mathrm{CO}}_2} \) :
-
Carbon dioxide partial pressure [bar]
- PFD:
-
Photon flux density [μmol m−2 s−1]
- \( {\mathrm{p}}_{{\mathrm{O}}_2} \) :
-
Oxygen partial pressure [bar]
- R:
-
Universal gas constant (0.08314 bar l mol−1 K−1)
- RAMOS®:
-
Respiration Activity MOnitoring System®
- RQ:
-
Respiration quotient
- S:
-
Concentration of substrate [g l−1]
- S phase:
-
Cell cycle phase
- SEM:
-
Scanning electron microscope
- t:
-
Time [d]
- VL:
-
Initial liquid filling volume [ml]
- Vt:
-
Total flask volume [ml]
- x:
-
Number of chromosomes of the monoploid genome
- α:
-
Proportionality constant
- κ:
-
Conductivity [mS cm−1]
- κm:
-
Measured conductivity [mS cm−1]
- μ:
-
Specific growth rate
- μmax:
-
Maximum specific growth rate
References
Zhong JJ (2001) Plant cells. Springer, Berlin
Ludwig-Müller J, Gutzeit H (2014) Biologie von Naturstoffen: Synthese, biologische Funktionen und Bedeutung für die Gesundheit. Ulmer, Stuttgart
Wink M (2003) Evolution of secondary metabolites from an ecological and molecular phylogenetic perspective. Phytochemistry 64:3–19
Wink M (2010) Functions and biotechnology of plant secondary metabolites. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford
Wink M (1999) Biochemistry of plant secondary metabolism. Sheffield Academic Publishers, Sheffield
Schopfer P, Brennicke A, Mohr H (2006) Pflanzenphysiologie. Elsevier/Spektrum Akad. Verl, München
Nessler CL (1994) Metabolic engineering of plant secondary products. Transgenic Res 3:109–115
Steingroewer J, Bley T, Georgiev V, Ivanov I, Lenk F, Marchev A, Pavlov A (2013) Bioprocessing of differentiated plant in vitro systems. Eng Life Sci 13:26–38
Winkler K (2015) Untersuchungen zur verfahrenstechnischen Verbesserung der Sekundärmetabolitproduktion mit pflanzlichen Zell- und Gewebekulturen. Dissertation, Technische Universität Dresden
Georgiev M, Ludwig-Müller J, Weber J, Stancheva N, Bley T (2010) Bioactive metabolite production and stress-related hormones in Devil’s claw cell suspension cultures grown in bioreactors. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 89:1683–1691
Ramachandra Rao S, Ravishankar GA (2002) Plant cell cultures: chemical factories of secondary metabolites. Biotechnol Adv 20:101–153
Eibl R, Eibl D (2008) Design of bioreactors suitable for plant cell and tissue cultures. Phytochem Rev 7:593–598
Zhong JJ (2001) Biochemical engineering of the production of plant-specific secondary metabolites by cell suspension cultures. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol 72:1–26
Fujita Y, Hara Y, Suga C, Morimoto T (1981) Production of shikonin derivatives by cell suspension cultures of Lithospermum erythrorhizon: II. A new medium for the production of shikonin derivatives. Plant Cell Rep 1:61–63
Wickremesinhe ERM, Arteea RN (1993) Taxus callus cultures: initiation, growth optimization, characterization and taxol production. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 35:181–193
Weber J, Georgiev V, Haas C, Bley T, Pavlov A (2010) Ploidy levels in Beta vulgaris (red beet) plant organs and in vitro systems. Eng Life Sci 10:139–147
Georgiev MI, Pavlov AI, Bley T (2007) Hairy root type plant in vitro systems as sources of bioactive substances. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 74:1175–1185
Georgiev M, Heinrich M, Kerns G, Pavlov A, Bley T (2006) Production of iridoids and phenolics by transformed Harpagophytum procumbens root cultures. Eng Life Sci 6:593–596
Matkowski A (2008) Plant in vitro culture for the production of antioxidants – a review. Biotechnol Adv 26:548–560
Geipel K, Socher ML, Haas C, Bley T, Steingroewer J (2013) Growth kinetics of a Helianthus annuus and a Salvia fruticosa suspension cell line: shake flask cultivations with online monitoring system. Eng Life Sci 13:593–602
Georgiev M, Georgiev V, Weber J, Bley T, Ilieva M, Pavlov A (2008) Agrobacterium rhizogenes-mediated genetic transformations: a powerful tool for the production of metabolites. In: Wolf TV, Koch JP (eds) Genetically modified plants. Nova, New York
Moore WJ, Hummel DO, Trafara G (1986) Physikalische Chemie, 4th edn. de Gruyter, Berlin
Taya M, Yoyama A, Kondo O, Kobayashi T, Matsui C (1989) Growth characteristics of plant hairy roots and their cultures in bioreactors. J Chem Eng Jpn 22:84–89
Mukundan U, Carvalho EB, Curtis WR (1998) Growth and pigment production by hairy root cultures of Beta vulgaris L. in a bubble column reactor. Biotechnol Lett 20:469
Pavlov A, Bley T (2006) Betalains biosynthesis by Beta vulgaris L. hairy root culture in a temporary immersion cultivation system. Process Biochem 41:848–852
Taya M, Hegglin M, Prenosil JE, Bourne JR (1989) On-line monitoring of cell growth in plant tissue cultures by conductometry. Enzyme Microb Technol 11:170–176
Pavlov A, Georgiev V, Ilieva M (2005) Betalain biosynthesis by red beet (Beta vulgaris L.) hairy root culture. Process Biochem 4:1531–1533
Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15:473–497
Linsmaier EM, Skoog F (1995) Organic growth factor requirements of tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 1965 18:100–127
Haas C, Weber J, Ludwig-Muller J, Deponte S, Bley T, Georgiev M (2008) Flow cytometry and phytochemical analysis of a sunflower cell suspension culture in a 5-L bioreactor. Z Naturforsch C J Biosci 63:699–705
Anderlei T, Büchs J (2001) Device for sterile online measurement of the oxygen transfer rate in shaking flasks. Biochem Eng J 7:157–162
Anderlei T, Zang W, Papaspyrou M, Büchs J (2004) Online respiration activity measurement (OTR, CTR, RQ) in shake flasks. Biochem Eng J 17:187–194
Büchs J (2002) Automatisches Meßsystem zur sterilen on-line Bestimmung der Sauerstofftransferrate (OTR) in Schüttelkolben. DE 44 15 444.5, 1994
Winkler K, Socher ML (2014) Shake flask technology. In: Flickinger MC (ed) Encyclopedia of industrial biotechnology: bioprocess, bioseparation, and cell technology. Wiley, New York
Wen ZY, Zhong JJ (1995) A simple and modified manometric method for measuring oxygen uptake rate of plant cells in flask cultures. Biotechnol Tech 9:521–526
Büchs J (2001) Introduction to advantages and problems of shaken cultures. Biochem Eng J 7:91–98
Amoabediny G, Büchs J (2010) Determination of CO(2) sensitivity of micro-organisms in shaken bioreactors. I. Novel method based on the resistance of sterile closure. Biotechnol Appl Biochem 57:157–166
Bähr C, Leuchtle B, Lehmann C et al (2012) Dialysis shake flask for effective screening in fed-batch mode. Biochem Eng J 69:182–195
Guez JS, Muller CH, Danze PM, Büchs J, Jacques P (2008) Respiration activity monitoring system (RAMOS), an efficient tool to study the influence of the oxygen transfer rate on the synthesis of lipopeptide by Bacillus subtilis ATCC6633. J Biotechnol 134:121–126
Hansen S, Hariskos I, Luchterhand B, Büchs J (2012) Development of a modified Respiration Activity Monitoring System for accurate and highly resolved measurement of respiration activity in shake flask fermentations. J Biol Eng 6:1–12
Kensy F, Engelbrecht C, Büchs J (2009) Scale-up from microtiter plate to laboratory fermenter: evaluation by online monitoring techniques of growth and protein expression in Escherichia coli and Hansenula polymorpha fermentations. Microb Cell Fact 8:1–15
Meier K, Klöckner W, Bonhage B, Antonov E, Regestein L, Büchs J (2016) Correlation for the maximum oxygen transfer capacity in shake flasks for a wide range of operating conditions and for different culture media. Biochem Eng J 109:228–235
Canzoneri M, Krüger R, Zang W, Biselli M (2006) Atmungsaktivität von Säugerzellen: Kontinuierliche Onlineermittlung im Schüttelkolben. BIOforum 3:45–47
Kowollik S, Schnitzler T, Biselli M et al (2010) Die Rolle des Respirationsquotienten in der Zellkulturfermentation. Chem Ing Tech 82:1505–1506
Raval KN, Hellwig S, Prakash G, Ramos-Plasencia A, Srivast A, Büchs J (2003) Necessity of a two-stage process for the production of azadirachtin-related limonoids in suspension cultures of Azadirachta indica. J Biosci Bioeng 96:16–22
Rechmann H, Friedrich A, Forouzan D, Barth S, Schnabl H, Biselli M, Boehm R (2007) Characterization of photosynthetically active duckweed (Wolffia australiana) in vitro culture by Respiration Activity Monitoring System (RAMOS). Biotechnol Lett 29:971–977
Ullisch DA, Müller CA, Maibaum S et al (2012) Comprehensive characterization of two different Nicotiana tabacum cell lines leads to doubled {GFP} and {HA} protein production by media optimization. J Biosci Bioeng 113:242–248
Haas C, Hengelhaupt KC, Kümmritz S, Bley T, Pavlov A, Steingroewer J (2014) Salvia suspension cultures as production systems for oleanolic and ursolic acid. Acta Physiol Plant 36:2137–2147
Schilling JV, Schillheim B, Mahr S, Reufer Y, Sanjoyo S, Büchs J (2015) Oxygen transfer rate identifies priming compounds in parsley cells. BMC Plant Biol 15:1–11
Kümmritz S, Louis M, Haas C Oehmichen F, Gantz S, Delenk H, Steudler S, Bley T, Steingroewer J (2016) Fungal elicitors combined with a sucrose feed significantly enhance triterpene production of a Salvia fruticosa cell suspension. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 100:7071–7082
Geipel K, Bley T, Steingroewer J (2014) Charakterisierung pflanzlicher in vitro-Kulturen am Beispiel Sonnenblume. BIOspektrum 20:450–452
Linden JC, Haigh JR, Mirjalili N, Phisaphalong M (2001) Gas concentration effects on secondary metabolite production by plant cell cultures. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol 72:27–62
Geipel K, Song X, Socher ML et al (2014) Induction of a photomixotrophic plant cell culture of Helianthus annuus and optimization of culture conditions for improved α-tocopherol production. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 98:2029–2040
Pavlov A, Werner S, Ilieva M, Bley T (2005) Characteristics of Helianthus annuus plant cell culture as a producer of immunologically active exopolysaccharides. Eng Life Sci 5:280–283
Haas C (2007) Flow cytometric and phytochemical investigations with plant cell suspension cultures of sunflower (Helianthus annuus). Diploma thesis, Technische Universität Dresden
Krook J, Vreugdenhil D, van der Plas LHW (2000) Uptake and phosphorylation of glucose and fructose in Daucus carota cell suspensions are differently regulated. Plant Physiol Biochem 38:603–612
Cohen Z (1999) Chemicals from microalgae. Taylor & Francis, London
Posten C (2009) Design principles of photo-bioreactors for cultivation of microalgae. Eng Life Sci 9:165–177
Wang CY, Fu CC, Liu YC (2007) Effects of using light-emitting diodes on the cultivation of Spirulina platensis. Biochem Eng J 37:21–25
Cerff M, Posten C (2012) Enhancing the growth of Physcomitrella patens by combination of monochromatic red and blue light – a kinetic study. Biotechnol J 7:527–536
Socher ML, Löser C, Schott C, Bley T, Steingroewer J (2016) The challenge of scaling up photobioreactors: modeling and approaches in small scale. Eng Life Sci 16:598–609
Socher ML, Lenk F, Geipel K Schott C, Püschel J, Haas C, Grasse C, Bley T, Steingroewer J (2014) Phototrophic growth of Arthrospira platensis in a respiration activity monitoring system for shake flasks (RAMOS®). Eng Life Sci 14:658–666
Lehr F, Morweiser M, Sastre RR, Kruse O, Posten C (2012) Process development for hydrogen production with Chlamydomonas reinhardtii based on growth and product formation kinetics. J Biotechnol 162:89–96
Krujatz F, Fehse K, Jahnel M et al (2016) MicrOLED-photobioreactor: design and characterization of a milliliter-scale Flat-Panel-Airlift-photobioreactor with optical process monitoring. Algal Res 18:225–234
Sasabe H, Kido J (2013) Development of high performance OLEDs for general lighting. J Mater Chem C 1:1699–1707
Galbraith DW, Harkins KR, Maddox JM, Ayres NM, Sharma DP, Firoozabady F (1983) Rapid flow cytometric analysis of the cell cycle in intact plant tissues. Science 220:1049–1051
Haas C, Hegner R, Helbig K, Bartels K, Bley T, Weber J (2016) Two parametric cell cycle analyses of plant cell suspension cultures with fragile, isolated nuclei to investigate heterogeneity in growth of batch cultivations. Biotechnol Bioeng 113:1244–1250
Greilhuber J, Doležel J, Lysák MA, Bennett MD (2005) The origin, evolution and proposed stabilization of the terms “genome size” and “C-value” to describe nuclear DNA contents. Ann Bot 95:255–260
Palomino G, Dolezel J, Cid R, Brunner I, Méndez I, Rubluo A (1999) Nuclear genome stability of Mammillaria san-angelensis (Cactaceae) regenerants induced by auxins in long-term in vitro culture. Plant Sci 141:191–200
Barow M, Meister A (2003) Endopolyploidy in seed plants is differently correlated to systematics, organ, life strategy and genome size. Plant Cell Environ 26:571–584
Valente P, Tao W, Verbelen JP (1998) Auxins and cytokinins control DNA endoreduplication and deduplication in single cells of tobacco. Plant Sci 134:207–215
Ochatt SJ (2008) Flow cytometry in plant breeding. Cytometry A 73A:581–598
Kumar PS, Mathur VL (2004) Chromosomal instability in callus culture of Pisum sativum. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 78:267–271
Javadi S, Kermani MJ, Irian S, Majd A (2013) Indirect regeneration from in vitro grown leaves of three pear cultivars and determination of ploidy level in regenerated shoots by flow cytometry. Sci Hortic 164:455–460
Jia Y, Zhang QX, Pan HT, Wang SQ, Liu QL, Sun LX (2014) Callus induction and haploid plant regeneration from baby primrose (Primula forbesii Franch.) anther culture. Sci Hortic 176:273–281
Vrána J, Cápal P, Bednárová M, Doležel J (2014) Flow cytometry in plant research: a success story. In: Nick P, Zdenek O (eds) Applied plant cell biology. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg
Vrána J, Šimková H, Kubaláková M, Čihaliková J, Doležel J (2012) Flow cytometric chromosome sorting in plants: the next generation. Methods 57:331–337
Doležel J, Kubaláková M, Paux E, Bartoš J, Feuillet C (2007) Chromosome-based genomics in the cereals. Chromosome Res 15:51–66
Castro S, Romeiras MM, Castro M, Duarte MC, Loureiro J (2013) Hidden diversity in wild Beta taxa from Portugal: insights from genome size and ploidy level estimations using flow cytometry. Plant Sci 207:72–78
Hoshino Y, Eiraku N, Ohata Y, Komai F (2016) Dynamics of nuclear phase changes during pollen tube growth by using in vitro culture in Petunia. Sci Hortic 210:143–149
Kamal KY, Hemmersbach R, Medina FJ, Herranz R (2015) Proper selection of controls in simulated microgravity research as illustrated with clinorotated plant cell suspension cultures. Life Sci Space Res 5:47–52
Dhooghe E, Laere KV, Eeckhaut T, Leus L, Huyle JV (2010) Mitotic chromosome doubling of plant tissues in vitro. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 104:359–373
Jesus-Gonzalez LD, Weathers PJ (2003) Tetraploid Artemisia annua hairy roots produce more artemisinin than diploids. Plant Cell Rep 21:809–813
Pavlov A, Berkov S, Weber J, Bley T (2008) Hyoscyamine biosynthesis in Datura stramonium hairy root in vitro systems with different ploidy levels. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 157:210–225
Škrlep K, Bergant M, Winter GMD et al (2008) Cryopreservation of cell suspension cultures of Taxus × media and Taxus floridana. Biol Plant 52:329–333
Dolezel J, Greilhuber J, Suda J (2007) Flow cytometry with plant cells. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Yanpaisan W, King NJC, Doran PM (1998) Analysis of cell cycle activity and population dynamics in heterogeneous plant cell suspensions using flow cytometry. Biotechnol Bioeng 58:515–528
Jenzsch M, Gnoth S, Kleinschmidt M, Simutis R, Lübbert A (2006) Improving the batch-to-batch reproducibility in microbial cultures during recombinant protein production by guiding the process along a predefined total biomass profile. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 29:315–321
Sonnleitner B (2000) Instrumentation of biotechnological processes. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol 66:1–64
Lidstrom ME, Konopka MC (2010) The role of physiological heterogeneity in microbial population behavior. Nat Chem Biol 6:705–712
Hall RD, Yeoman MM (1987) Intercellular and intercultural heterogeneity in secondary metabolite accumulation in cultures of Catharanthus roseus following cell line selection. J Exp Bot 38:1391–1398
Wilson SA, Cummings EM, Roberts SC (2014) Multi-scale engineering of plant cell cultures for promotion of specialized metabolism. Curr Opin Biotechnol 29:163–170
Müller S, Harms H, Bley T (2010) Origin and analysis of microbial population heterogeneity in bioprocesses. Curr Opin Biotechnol 21:100–113
Taticek RA, Moo-Young M, Legge RL (1991) The scale-up of plant cell culture: engineering considerations. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 24:139–158
Georgiev MI, Weber J, Maciuk A (2009) Bioprocessing of plant cell cultures for mass production of targeted compounds. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 83:809–823
Cebolla A, Vinardell JM, Kiss E, Oláh B, Roudier F, Kondorosi A, Kondorosi E (1999) The mitotic inhibitor ccs52 is required for endoreduplication and ploidy-dependent cell enlargement in plants. EMBO J 18:4476–4484
Stancheva N, Weber J, Schulze J et al (2010) Phytochemical and flow cytometric analyses of Devil’s claw cell cultures. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 105:79–84
Yanpaisan W, King NJC, Doran PM (1999) Flow cytometry of plant cells with applications in large-scale bioprocessing. Biotechnol Adv 17:3–27
Diermeier-Daucher S, Clarke ST, Hill D, Vollmann-Zwerenz A, Bradford JA, Brockhoff G (2009) Cell type specific applicability of 5-ethynyl-2′-deoxyuridine (EdU) for dynamic proliferation assessment in flow cytometry. Cytometry A 75:535–546
Darzynkiewicz Z, Traganos F, Zhao H, Halicka HD, Li J (2011) Cytometry of DNA replication and RNA synthesis: historical perspective and recent advances based on “click chemistry”. Cytometry A 79:328–337
Glab N, Labidi B, Qin LX, Trehin C, Bergounioux C, Meijer L (1994) Olomoucine, an inhibitor of the cdc2/cdk2 kinases activity, blocks plant cells at the G1 to S and G2 to M cell cycle transitions. FEBS Lett 353:207–211
Tréhin C, Planchais S, Glab N, Perennes C, Tregear J, Bergounioux C (1998) Cell cycle regulation by plant growth regulators: involvement of auxin and cytokinin in the re-entry of Petunia protoplasts into the cell cycle. Planta 206:215–224
Sakaue-Sawano A, Kurokawa H, Morimura T et al (2008) Visualizing spatiotemporal dynamics of multicellular cell-cycle progression. Cell 132:487–498
Newman RH, Zhang J (2008) Fucci: street lights on the road to mitosis. Chem Biol 15:97–98
Nishitani H, Lygerou Z, Nishimoto T (2004) Proteolysis of DNA replication licensing factor Cdt1 in S-phase is performed independently of geminin through its N-terminal region. J Biol Chem 279:30807–30816
Zielke N, Edgar BA (2015) FUCCI sensors: powerful new tools for analysis of cell proliferation. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Dev Biol 4:469–487
Yin K, Ueda M, Takagi H et al (2014) A dual-color marker system for in vivo visualization of cell cycle progression in Arabidopsis. Plant J 80:541–552
Naill MC, Kolewe ME, Roberts SC (2012) Paclitaxel uptake and transport in Taxus cell suspension cultures. Biochem Eng J 63:50–56
Doran PM (2006) Foreign protein degradation and instability in plants and plant tissue cultures. Trends Biotechnol 24:426–432
Kirchhoff J, Raven N, Boes A et al (2012) Monoclonal tobacco cell lines with enhanced recombinant protein yields can be generated from heterogeneous cell suspension cultures by flow sorting. Plant Biotechnol J 10:936–944
Moussaieff A, Rogachev I, Brodsky L et al (2013) High-resolution metabolic mapping of cell types in plant roots. Proc Natl Acad Sci 110:E1232–E1241
Bargmann BOR, Birnbaum KD (2009) Positive fluorescent selection permits precise, rapid, and in-depth overexpression analysis in plant protoplasts. Plant Physiol 149:1231–1239
Grasso MS, Lintilhac PM (2016) Microbead encapsulation of living plant protoplasts: a new tool for the handling of single plant cells. Appl Plant Sci 4. doi:10.3732/apps.1500140
Kieran PM, Malone DM, MacLoughlin PF (2000) Effects of hydrodynamic and interfacial forces on plant cell suspension systems. In: Schügerl K, Kretzmer G (eds) Influence of stress on cell growth and product formation. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg
Kieran PM, MacLoughlin PF, Malone DM (1997) Plant cell suspension cultures: some engineering considerations. J Biotechnol 59:39–52
Rathore S, Desai PM, Liew CV, Chan LW, Heng PWS (2013) Microencapsulation of microbial cells. J Food Eng 116:369–381
Singh B, Kaur A (2014) In vitro production of beneficial bioactive compounds from plants by cell immobilization. In: Kumar A (ed) Biotechnology. Plant biotechnology, vol 2. Studium Press LLC, New Delhi
Brodelius P (1985) The potential role of immobilization in plant cell biotechnology. Trends Biotechnol 3:280–285
Huang TK, McDonald KA (2012) Bioreactor systems for in vitro production of foreign proteins using plant cell cultures. Biotechnol Adv 30:398–409
Dörnenburg H, Knorr D (1995) Strategies for the improvement of secondary metabolite production in plant cell cultures. Enzyme Microb Technol 17:674–684
Sabater-Jara AB, Tudela LR, López-Pérez AJ (2010) In vitro culture of Taxus sp.: strategies to increase cell growth and taxoid production. Phytochem Rev 9:343–356
Malda J, Visser J, Melchels FP et al (2013) 25th anniversary article: engineering hydrogels for biofabrication. Adv Mater 25:5011–5028
Billiet T, Vandenhaute M, Schelfhout J, Van Vlierberghe S, Dubruel P (2012) A review of trends and limitations in hydrogel-rapid prototyping for tissue engineering. Biomaterials 33:6020–6041
Lode A, Krujatz F, Brüggemeier S et al (2015) Green bioprinting: fabrication of photosynthetic algae-laden hydrogel scaffolds for biotechnological and medical applications. Eng Life Sci 15:177–183
Derby B (2012) Printing and prototyping of tissues and scaffolds. Science 338:921–926
Ozbolat IT (2015) Bioprinting scale-up tissue and organ constructs for transplantation. Trends Biotechnol 33:395–400
Krujatz F, Lode A, Brüggemeier S et al (2015) Green bioprinting: viability and growth analysis of microalgae immobilized in 3D-plotted hydrogels versus suspension cultures. Eng Life Sci 15:678–688
Schütz K, Placht AM, Paul B, Brüggemeier S, Gelinsky M, Lode A (2015) Three-dimensional plotting of a cell-laden alginate/methylcellulose blend: towards biofabrication of tissue engineering constructs with clinically relevant dimensions. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. https://doi.org/10.1002/term.2058
Acknowledgment
The authors thank Joachim Püschel and Dr. Beatrice Weber from the Institute of Botany, TU Dresden, for helpful discussions concerning the scheme in Fig. 10.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this entry
Cite this entry
Steingroewer, J. et al. (2018). Monitoring of Plant Cells and Tissues in Bioprocesses. In: Pavlov, A., Bley, T. (eds) Bioprocessing of Plant In Vitro Systems. Reference Series in Phytochemistry. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54600-1_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54600-1_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-54599-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-54600-1
eBook Packages: Chemistry and Materials ScienceReference Module Physical and Materials ScienceReference Module Chemistry, Materials and Physics