Skip to main content

Literature Review on Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Hemorrhoids

Part of the book series: Coloproctology ((COLOPROCT,volume 2))

  • 953 Accesses

Abstract

This review of the current literature on stapled hemorrhoidopexy (SH) aims to give readers a summary of SH compared to other techniques in managing advanced-grade (i.e., grade III and IV) internal hemorrhoids, examining the most current data reported in the published literature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 419.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bilgin Y, Hot S, Barlas IS, Akan A, Eryavuz Y (2015) Short-and long-term results of harmonic scalpel hemorrhoidectomy versus stapler hemorrhoidopexy in treatment of hemorrhoidal disease. Asian J Surgery 38:214–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giordano P, Gravante G, Sorge R, Ovens L, Nastro P (2009) Long-term outcomes of stapled hemorrhoidopexy vs conventional hemorrhoidectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Surg 144(3):266–272

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Infantino A, Altomare DF, Bottini C et al (2012) Prospective randomized multicentre study comparing stapler haemorrhoidopexy with Doppler-guided transanal haemorrhoid dearterialization for third-degree haemorrhoids. Color Dis 14:205–211

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jayaraman S, Colquhoun PH, Malthaner RA (2006) Stapled versus conventional surgery for hemorrhoids. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 18(4):CD005393

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim JS, Vashist YK, Thieltges S et al (2013) Stapled hemorrhoidopexy versus Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy in circumferential third-degree hemorrhoids: long-term results of a randomized controlled trial. J Gastrointest Surg 17(7):1292–1298

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leardi S, Pessia B, Mascio M, Piccione F, Schietroma M, Pietroletti R (2016) Doppler-Guided Transanal Hemorrhoidal Dearterialization (DG-THD) Versus Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy (SH) in the Treatment of Third-Degree Hemorrhoids: Clinical Results at Short and Long-Term Follow-Up. J Gastrointest Surg 20(11):1886–1890

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nystrom PO, Qvist N, Raahave D et al (2010) Randomised clinical trial of symptom control after stapled anopexy or diathermy excision for haemorrhoid prolapse. Br J Surg 97(2):167–176

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reboa G, Gipponi M, Gallo M et al (2016) High-volume transanal surgery with CPH34 HV for the treatment of III-IV degree haemorrhoids: final short-term results of an Italian multicentre clinical study. Surg Res Pract 2906145

    Google Scholar 

  • Ribaric G, Kofler J, Jayne DG (2011) Stapled hemorrhoidopexy, an innovative surgical procedure for hemorrhoidal prolapse: cost-utility analysis. Croat Med J 52(4):497–504

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sajid MS, Parampalli U, Whitehouse P, Sains P, McFall MR, Baig MK (2012) A systematic review comparing transanal haemorrhoidal de-arterialisation to stapled haemorrhoidopexy in the management of haemorrhoidal disease. Tech Coloproctol 16:1–8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Simillis C, Thoukididou SN, Slesser AAP, Rasheed S, Tan E, Tekkis PP (2015) Systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing clinical outcomes and effectiveness of surgical treatments for haemorrhoids. Br J Surg 102:1603–1618

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Trompetto M, Clerico G, Cocorullo GF et al (2015) Evaluation and management of haemorrhoids: Italian society of colorectal surgery (SICCR) consensus statement. Tech Coloproctol 19:567–575

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tsang YP, Fok KL, Cheung YS, Li KW, Tang CN (2014) Comparison of transanal haemorrhoidal dearterialiation and stapled haemorrhoidopexy in management of haemorrhoidal disease: a retrospective study and literature review. Tech Coloproctol 18(11):1017–1022

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Venturi M, Salamina G, Vergani C (2016) Stapled anopexy versus transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization for hemorrhoidal disease: a three-year follow-up from a randomized study. Minerva Chir 71(6):365–371

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Watson AJ, Hudson J, Wood J et al (2016) Comparison of stapled haemorrhoidopexy with traditional excisional surgery for haemorrhoidal disease (eTHoS): a pragmatic, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 388:2375–2385

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emile Kwong-Wei Tan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Tan, E.KW., Ng, J., Tang, CL. (2018). Literature Review on Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy. In: Ratto, C., Parello, A., Litta, F. (eds) Hemorrhoids. Coloproctology, vol 2. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53357-5_33

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53357-5_33

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-53356-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-53357-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineReference Module Medicine

Publish with us

Policies and ethics