Skip to main content

Repatriation and Restitution of Cultural Property: Relevant Rules of International Law

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology

Introduction

The logical and legal link between appropriation and restitution of cultural properties is self-evident. If appropriation of the properties is illegal, there is an obligation to return them. Any State which is responsible of an internationally wrongful act is bound, first of all, to reestablish the situation that would have existed if the act had not occurred.

The question of restitution of cultural properties (A distinction is sometimes made today between “return,” used in a general sense, and “restitution,” used for stolen or illegally exported properties. The term “repatriation” is also used. But such questions of terminology do not seem important.) is the subject matter of a number of international treaties which have a world scope of application. Their main provisions can today be considered as belonging also to customary international law. The trend toward the restitution is growing, as the result of the application of principles having also a moral and cultural...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Borelli, S., and F. Lenzerini, eds. 2012. Cultural heritage, cultural rights, cultural diversity. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francioni, F., and J. Gordely. 2013. Enforcing international cultural heritage law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Merryman, J.H. 1986. Two ways of thinking about cultural property. American Journal of International Law 80 (4): 847.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nafziger, J.A.R., and A.M. Nicgorski, eds. 2009. Cultural heritage issues: The legacy of conquest, colonization, and commerce. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nafziger, J.A.R., and T. Scovazzi, eds. 2008. Le patrimoine culturel de l’humanité – The cultural heritage of mankind. Leiden: A.V.M. Struycken.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandholtz, W. 2007. Prohibiting plunder: How norms change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Scovazzi, T. 2011. Diviser c’est détruire: Ethical principles and legal rules in the field of return of cultural property. Rivista di Diritto Internazionale 94 (2): 341.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tullio Scovazzi .

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Scovazzi, T. (2018). Repatriation and Restitution of Cultural Property: Relevant Rules of International Law. In: Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51726-1_1503-2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51726-1_1503-2

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-51726-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-51726-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference HistoryReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

Publish with us

Policies and ethics