Synonym
Definition
The healthy mate hypothesis states that mate choice is based on secondary sexual characteristics that act as a proxy for assessing the potential mate’s overall health and parasite resistance.
Introduction
Sexual selection works on the premise that, out of a pool of potential mates, only few succeed to mate. Usually, the member of the sex that invests more into reproduction undergoes some form of assessment of the potential mate in order to maximize their reproductive success, which in turn creates a selection pressure. Maybe one of the most famous examples of sexual selection is that of the peacock and the peahen. The long, elaborate tail of the peacock has played a role in Darwin’s development of sexual selection theory (Darwin 1859, 1871). Darwin could not explain this attribute with natural selection, as the extravagant tails of peacocks do not appear to be a form of adaptation for survival. Sexual selection, however, provides an explanation...
References
Alatalo, R. V., Lundberg, A., & Glynn, C. (1986). Female pied flycatchers choose territory quality and not male characteristics. Nature, 323(6084), 152–153.
Andersson, M. B. (1994). Sexual selection. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Andersson, M., & Simmons, L. W. (2006). Sexual selection and mate choice. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 21(6), 296–302.
Borgia, G. (1986). Satin bowerbird parasites: A test of the bright male hypothesis. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 19(5), 355–358.
Borgia, G., & Collis, K. (1989). Female choice for parasite-free male satin bowerbirds and the evolution of bright male plumage. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 25(6), 445–453.
Breed, M. D., & Moore, J. (2015). Animal behavior. Amsterdam: Academic.
Candolin, U. (2003). The use of multiple cues in mate choice. Biological Reviews, 78(4), 575–595.
Darwin, C. (1859). On the origin of the species by natural selection.
Darwin, C. (1871). Sexual selection and the descent of man. London: Murray.
Davies, N. B. (1992). Dunnock behaviour and social evolution (Vol. 3). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fisher, R. A. (1930). The genetical theory of natural selection: A complete variorum edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hamilton, W. D., & Zuk, M. (1982). Heritable true fitness and bright birds: A role for parasites? Science, 218(4570), 384–387.
Kirkpatrick, M., & Ryan, M. J. (1991). The evolution of mating preferences and the paradox of the lek. Nature, 350(6313), 33.
Lande, R. (1981). Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 78(6), 3721–3725.
Møller, A. P. (1990). Parasites and sexual selection: Current status of the Hamilton and Zuk hypothesis. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 3(5–6), 319–328.
Møller, A. P., & Saino, N. (1994). Parasites, immunology of hosts, and host sexual selection. The Journal of Parasitology, 80, 850–858.
Rowe, L., & Houle, D. (1996). The lek paradox and the capture of genetic variance by condition dependent traits. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 263(1375), 1415–1421.
Thornhill, R., & Alcock, J. (1983). The evolution of insect mating systems. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Zuk, M. (1992). The role of parasites in sexual selection: Current evidence and future directions. Advances in the Study of Behavior, 21, 39–68.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this entry
Cite this entry
Siekelova, M. (2018). Healthy Mate Hypothesis. In: Vonk, J., Shackelford, T. (eds) Encyclopedia of Animal Cognition and Behavior. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47829-6_299-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47829-6_299-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-47829-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-47829-6
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences