Abstract
In identifying intrinsic molecular chance and extrinsic adaptive pressures as the only causally relevant factors in the process of evolution, the theoretical perspective of the Modern Synthesis had a major impact on the perceived tenability of an ontology of dispositional properties. However, since the late 1970s, an increasing number of evolutionary biologists have challenged the descriptive and explanatory adequacy of this chance alone, extrinsic only understanding of evolutionary change. Because morphological studies of homology, convergence, and teratology have revealed a space of possible forms and phylogenetic trajectories that is considerably more restricted than expected, evo-devo has focused on the causal contribution of intrinsic developmental processes to the course of evolution. Evo-devo’s investigation into the developmental structure of the modality of morphology – including both the possibility and impossibility of organismal form – has led to the utilization of a number of dispositional concepts that emphasize the tendency of the evolutionary process to change along certain routes. In this sense, and in contrast to the perspective of the Modern Synthesis, evo-devo can be described as a science of dispositions. This chapter discusses the recent philosophical literature on dispositional properties in evo-devo, exploring debates about both the metaphysical and epistemological aspects of the central dispositional concepts utilized in contemporary evo-devo (e.g., variability, modularity, robustness, plasticity, and evolvability) and addressing the epistemological question of how dispositional properties challenge existing explanatory models in evolutionary biology.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
References
Austin CJ (2017) Evo-devo: a science of dispositions. Eur J Philos Sci 7:373–389
Bolker JA (2000) Modularity in development and why it matters to evo-devo. Am Zool 40:770–776
Brigandt I (2015a) Evolutionary developmental biology and the limits of philosophical accounts of mechanistic explanation. In: Braillard P-A, Malaterre C (eds) Explanation in biology: an enquiry into the diversity of explanatory patterns in the life sciences. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 135–173
Brigandt I (2015b) From developmental constraint to evolvability: how concepts figure in explanation and disciplinary identity. In: Love A (ed) Conceptual change in biology. Boston studies in the philosophy and history of science, vol 307. Springer, Dordrecht
Brown RL (2014) What evolvability really is. Br J Philos Sci 65:549–572
Calcott B (2009) Lineage explanations: explaining how biological mechanisms change. Br J Philos Sci 60:51–78
Eble GJ (2003) Developmental and non-developmental morphospaces in evolutionary biology. In: Crutchfield JP, Schuster P (eds) Evolutionary dynamics: exploring the interplay of selection, accident, neutrality, and function. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Grene MG, Depew DJ (2004) The philosophy of biology: an episodic history. Cambridge University Press, New York
Hendrikse JL, Parsons TW, Hallgrímmson B (2007) Evolvability as the proper focus of evolutionary developmental biology. Evol Dev 9(4):393–401
Kirschner M, Gerhart J (1998) Evolvability. Proc Natl Acad Sci 95:8420–8427
Love A (2003) Evolvability, dispositions, and intrinsicality. Philos Sci 70:1015–1027
Mayr E (1992) The idea of teleology. J Hist Ideas 53:117–135
Mills SK, Beatty JH (1979) The propensity interpretation of fitness. Philos Sci 46:263–286
Nuño de la Rosa L (2017) Computing the extended synthesis: mapping the dynamics and conceptual structure of the evolvability research front. J Exp Zool Part B Mol Dev Evol 328:395–411
Pavlicev M, Wagner GP (2012) Coming to grips with evolvability. Evol Educ Outreach 5(2):231–244
Pigliucci M (2008) Is evolvability evolvable? Nat Rev Genet 9:75–82
Sniegowski PD, Murphy H a (2006) Evolvability. Curr Biol 16:R831–R834
Sterenly K (2007) What is evolvability? In: Philosophy of Biology. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 163–173
Vetter B (2013) Multi-track dispositions. Philos Q 63(251):330–352
Wagner GP (2014) Homology, genes, and evolutionary innovation. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Wagner GP, Altenberg L (1996) Perspective: complex adaptations and the evolution of Evolvability. Evolution 50:967–976
Wagner GP, Pavlicev M, Cheverud JM (2007) The road to modularity. Nat Rev Genet 8:921–931
Walsh DM (2015) Organisms, agency, and evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this entry
Cite this entry
Austin, C.J., Nuño de la Rosa, L. (2018). Dispositional Properties in Evo-Devo. In: Nuno de la Rosa, L., Müller, G. (eds) Evolutionary Developmental Biology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33038-9_64-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33038-9_64-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-33038-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-33038-9
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Biomedicine and Life SciencesReference Module Biomedical and Life Sciences