Abstract
The concept of burden was developed around the 1970s by Austrian zoologist Rupert Riedl, based on morphological insights rooted in Karl Ernst von Baer’s embryological tradition. Burden’s main tenet is that as a morphological character evolves, it develops more relationships with other characters, becoming more and more interconnected. Through this process, the morphological character acquires more biological “responsibilities” within the organism. Two main consequences of the burden hypothesis are that (1) a character’s evolvability will be limited by these responsibilities and (2) a set of heavily burdened characters could be considered as part of the body plan of a taxonomic group. The concept of burden is intimately related to that of developmental constraint, and as such, it is central to evo-devo.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Arthur W (2015) Internal factors in evolution: the morphogenetic tree, developmental bias, and some thoughts on the conceptual structure of evo-devo. In: Love A (ed) Conceptual change in biology, Boston studies in the philosophy and history of science, vol 307. Springer, Dordrecht
Bonner JT (ed) (1982) Evolution and development. Report of the Dahlem workshop on evolution and development Berlin 1981, May 10–15. Springer, Berlin
Budd GE (2006) On the origin and evolution of major morphological characters. Biol Rev 81:609–628
de Beer GR (1940) Embryos and ancestors. Clarendon Press, Oxford
Erwin DH, Davidson EH (2009) The evolution of hierarchical gene regulatory networks. Nat Rev Genet 10:141–148
Esteve-Altava B, Botella H, Marugán-Lobón J, Rasskin-Gutman D (2013a) Structural constraints in the evolution of the skull: Williston’s law revisited. Evol Biol 40:209–219
Esteve-Altava B, Marugán-Lobón J, Botella H, Bastir M, Rasskin-Gutman D (2013b) Grist for Riedl’s mill: a network model perspective on the integration and modularity of the human skull. JEZ Part B Mol Dev Evol 320(8):489–500
Gilbert S (2013) Developmental biology, 10th edn. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland
Goldschmidt R (1940) The material basis of evolution. Yale University Press, New Haven
Goswami A, Polly PD (2010) The influence of modularity on cranial morphological disparity in Carnivora and Primates (Mammalia). PLoS One 5:e9517
Gould SJ (1977) Ontogeny and phylogeny. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Haeckel E (1874) Anthropogenie oder Entwickelungsgeschichte des Menschen. Englemann, Leipzig
Jacob E (1977) Evolution and tinkering. Science 196(4295):1161–1166
Maynard Smith J, Burian R, Kauffman S, Alberch P, Campbell J, Goodwin B, Lande R, Raup D, Wolpert L (1985) Developmental constraints and evolution: a perspective from the Mountain Lake conference on development and evolution. Q Rev Biol 60(3):265–287
Olson EC, Miller RL (1958) Morphological integration. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Pavlicev M, Wagner GP (2012) Coming to grips with evolvability. Evo Edu Outreach 5:231–244
Raff RA (1996) The shape of life: genes, development, and the evolution of animal form. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Rasskin-Gutman D, Esteve-Altava B (2014) Connecting the dots: anatomical network analysis in morphological EvoDevo. Biol Theory 9:178–193
Riedl R (1978) Order in living organisms: a systems analysis of evolution. Wiley, New York
Schoch RR (2010) Riedl’s burden and the body plan: selection, constraint, and deep time. J Exp Zool Mol Dev Evol 314B:1–10
Slack JMW, Holland PW, Graham CF (1993) The zootype and the phylotypic stage. Nature 361:490–492
Thompson DW (1917) On growth and form. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
von Baer KE (1828) Entwicklungsgeschichte der Thiere: Beobachtung und Reflexion. Königsberg, Bornträger
Waddington CH (1956) Genetic assimilation. Adv Genet 10:257–290
Wagner GP, Laubichler MD (2004) Rupert Riedl and the re-synthesis of evolutionary and developmental biology: body plans and evolvability. J Exp Zool Mol Dev Evol 302B:92–102
Wimsatt WC (1986) Developmental constraints, generative entrenchment and the innate acquired distinction. In: Bechtel W (ed) Integrating scientific disciplines. Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht, pp 185–208
Wimsatt WC (2007) Echoes of Haeckel? Reentrenching development in evolution. In: Laubichler MD, Maienschein J (eds) From embryology to evo-devo: a history of developmental evolution. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 309–355
Acknowledgments
DRG funded by MINECO-FEDER BFU2015-70927-R. BE-A is funded by a European Union’s Horizon 2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant No. 654155.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Rasskin-Gutman, D., Esteve-Altava, B. (2018). Concept of Burden in Evo-Devo. In: Nuno de la Rosa, L., Müller, G. (eds) Evolutionary Developmental Biology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33038-9_48-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33038-9_48-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-33038-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-33038-9
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Biomedicine and Life SciencesReference Module Biomedical and Life Sciences