Abstract
Embryogenesis is the process of transformation of a single fertilized egg into a differentiated, complex organism. This requires coordinated cleavage of the fertilized egg, followed by patterning and cell-fate specification, to establish the adult body plan. Based on morphological studies and, more recently, comparative gene expression analyses, the evolution of embryogenesis in animals, and to some degree in plants, has been proposed to follow a developmental hourglass model. In this model, less conserved early events are followed by a highly conserved phylotypic stage at the narrow waist of the hourglass where species within a phylum have similar morphologies and gene expression patterns. Variation in later stages of embryogenesis then follows, providing the diversity of morphologies found in adult forms. As the phylotypic stage is the most conserved, it implies there may be greater evolutionary constrains during mid-embryogenesis compared with the less conserved early and late stages. These constraints may relate to morphological events, and/or the underlying gene regulatory networks, at the different stages of embryogenesis, as well as the requirement for embryogenesis to produce viable offspring adapted to environmental variation.
References
von Baer KE. (1828) Über Entwickelungsgeschichte der Thiere: Beobachtung und Reflexion. Gebrüdern Bornträger, Königsberg
Bininda-Emonds ORP, Jeffery JE, Richardson MK (2003) Inverting the hourglass: quantitative evidence against the phylotypic stage in vertebrate development. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 270(1513):341–346
Comte A, Roux J, Robinson-Rechavi M (2010) Molecular signaling in zebrafish development and the vertebrate phylotypic period. Evol Dev 12(2):144–156
Dearden PK, Wilson MJ, Sablan L, Osborne PW, Havler M, McNaughton E, Kimura K, Milshina NV, Hasselmann M, Gempe T, Schioett M, Brown SJ, Elsik CG, Holland PWH, Kadowaki T, Beye M (2006) Patterns of conservation and change in honey bee developmental genes. Genome Res 16(11):1376–1384
Domazet-Loso T, Tautz D (2010) A phylogenetically based transcriptome age index mirrors ontogenetic divergence patterns. Nature 468(7325):815–818
Drost H-G, Gabel A, Grosse I, Quint M (2015) Evidence for active maintenance of phylotranscriptomic hourglass patterns in animal and plant embryogenesis. Mol Biol Evol 32(5):1221–1231
Duboule D (1994) Temporal colinearity and the phylotypic progression: a basis for the stability of a vertebrate Bauplan and the evolution of morphologies through heterochrony. Development 1994(Suppl):135–142
Elinson RP (1987) Change in developmental patterns: embryos of amphibians with large eggs. In: Raff RA, Raff EC (eds) Development as an evolutionary process. Alan R. Liss, New York, pp 1–21
Emerald BS, Roy JK (1997) Homeotic transformation in Drosophila. Nature 389:684
Finklstein R, Perrimon N (1990) The orthodenticle gene is regulated by bicoid and torso and specifies Drosophila head development. Nature 346:485–488
Galis F, Metz JA (2001) Testing the vulnerability of the phylotypic stage: on modularity and evolutionary conservation. J Exp Zool 291(2):195–204
Garcia-Fernà ndez J (2004) Hox, ParaHox, ProtoHox: facts and guesses. Heredity 94:145–152
Gilbert SF (2006) Developmental biology, 8th edn. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland
Hall BK (1997) Phylotypic stage or phantom: is there a highly conserved embryonic stage in vertebrates? Trends Ecol Evol 12(12):461–463
Holland PWH (2012) Evolution of homeobox genes. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Dev Biol 2(1):31–45
Irie N, Kuratani S (2011) Comparative transcriptome analysis reveals vertebrate phylotypic period during organogenesis. Nat Commun 2:248
Irie N, Sehara-Fujisawa A (2007) The vertebrate phylotypic stage and an early bilaterian-related stage in mouse embryogenesis defined by genomic information. BMC Biol 5(1):1
Kalinka AT, Varga KM, Gerrard DT, Preibisch S, Corcoran DL, Jarrells J, Ohler U, Bergman CM, Tomancak P (2010) Gene expression divergence recapitulates the developmental hourglass model. Nature 468:811–814
Levin M, Hashimshony T, Wagner F, Yanai I (2012) Developmental milestones punctuate gene expression in the Caenorhabditis embryo. Dev Cell 22(5):1101–1108
Lewis EB (1978) A gene complex controlling segmentation in Drosophila. Nature 276(5688):565–570
Meckel JF (1811) Beyträge zur vergleichenden Anatomie. Carl Heinrich Reclam, Leipzig
Peter IS, Davidson EH (2011) Evolution of gene regulatory networks controlling body plan development. Cell 144(6):970–985
Quint M, Drost H-G, Gabel A, Ullrich KK, Bönn M, Grosse I (2012) A transcriptomic hourglass in plant embryogenesis. Nature 490:98–101
Raff RA (1996) The shape of life: genes, development and the evolution of animal form. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Richardson MK (1995) Heterochrony and the phylotypic period. Dev Biol 172(2):412–421
Richardson MK, Hanken J, Gooneratne ML, Pieau C, Raynaud A, Selwood L, Wright GM (1997) There is no highly conserved embryonic stage in the vertebrates: implications for current theories of evolution and development. Anat Embryol 196(2):91–106
Roux J, Robinson-Rechavi M (2008) Developmental constraints on vertebrate genome evolution. PLoS Genet 4(12):e1000311
Sander K (1983) The evolution of patterning mechanisms: gleanings from insect embryogenesis and spermatogenesis. In: Goodwin BC, Holder N, Wylie CC. (eds) Development and evolution: the sixth symposium of the British Society for Developmental Biology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Santos ME, Le Bouquin A, Crumière AJJ, Khila A (2017) Taxon-restricted genes at the origin of a novel trait allowing access to a new environment. Science 358(6361):386–390
Serres, ERA (1842) Précis d’anatomie transcendante appliquée á la physiologie. Charles Gosselin, Paris
Schep AN, Adryan B (2013) A comparative analysis of transcription factor expression during metazoan embryonic development. PLoS One 8(6):e66826
Seidel F (1960) Körpergrundgestalt und Keimstruktur. Eine Erörterung über die Grundlagen der vergleichenden und experimentellen Embryologie und deren Gültigkeit bei phylogenetischen Berlegungen. Zool Anz 164:245–305
Small KM, Potter SS (1993) Homeotic transformations and limb defects in Hox A11 mutant mice. Genes Dev 7:2318–2328
Smith JM, Burian R, Kauffman S, Alberch P, Campbell J, Goodwin B, Lande R, Raup D, Wolpert L (1985) Developmental constraints and evolution: a perspective from the Mountain Lake conference on development and evolution. Q Rev Biol 60(3):265–287
Wilson MJ, Dearden PK (2011) Diversity in insect axis formation: two orthodenticle genes and hunchback act in anterior patterning and influence dorsoventral organization in the honeybee (Apis mellifera). Development 138(16):3497–3507
Yanai I, Peshkin L, Jorgensen P, Kirschner MW (2011) Mapping gene expression in two Xenopus species: evolutionary constraints and developmental flexibility. Dev Cell 20(4):483–496
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Cridge, A.G., Dearden, P.K., Brownfield, L.R. (2019). The Developmental Hourglass in the Evolution of Embryogenesis. In: Nuno de la Rosa, L., Müller, G. (eds) Evolutionary Developmental Biology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33038-9_185-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33038-9_185-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-33038-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-33038-9
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Biomedicine and Life SciencesReference Module Biomedical and Life Sciences