Abstract
Aviation law developed in an era consisting almost entirely of manned operations. The introduction of unmanned aircraft into this legal and regulatory framework raises questions as to the applicability of much of that framework to unmanned operations. This chapter summarizes the evolving federal statutory and regulatory response to unmanned operations, which during the past 5 years reflects clear congressional direction to and response by the Federal Aviation Administration to integrate unmanned operations into the national airspace. This chapter also summarizes the impact of various state and local governmental responses to the increase in unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) operations, in light of the current statutory and regulatory framework providing for federal sovereignty over navigable airspace and preemption of state authority over flight operations while retaining for States responsibility for land use and property ownership. Because the doctrine of federal preemption, which derives from the Supremacy Clause of the US Constitution, restricts state and local governmental authority for regulating flight operations in navigable airspace, full incorporation of unmanned operations into navigable airspace may well result in redefining well-established roles and responsibilities for regulating certain UAS operations, especially those in low-altitude airspace.
The views and positions expressed herein are solely those of the authors and do not reflect the views or positions of the Federal Aviation Administration.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
References
14 C.F.R. § 99.7
14 C.F.R. 91.13(a)
14 C.F.R. part 107
14 C.F.R. part 61, subpart C
14 C.F.R. parts 21-193
18 U.S.C. 1030
18 U.S.C. 119
18 U.S.C. 121
18 U.S.C. 206
18 U.S.C. 32
49 U.S.C. 40102(a)(32)
49 U.S.C. 40103
49 U.S.C. 44502
49 U.S.C. 44701 – 44735
80 Fed. Reg. 63912, Clarification of the Applicability of Aircraft Registration Requirements for Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) and Request for Information Regarding Electronic Registration for UAS (October 22, 2015)
80 Fed. Reg. 78594 (Registration and Marking Requirements for Small Unmanned Aircraft (December 16, 2015)
81 Fed. Reg. 42064-42214, Operation and Certification of Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems (June 28, 2016)
81 Fed. Reg. 60402, Drone Advisory Committee Meeting (September 1, 2016)
Air Evac EMS, Inc. v. Robinson, 486 F. Supp. 2d 713, 722 (M.D. Tenn. 2007)
Alaska Stat. § 02.15.030
Amazon Prime Air., https://www.amazon.com/b?node=8037720011
American Airlines v. City of Audubon Park, 407 F.2d 1306 (6th Cir. 1969)
American Airlines v. Town of Hempstead, 398 F.2d 369 (2d Cir. 1968)
Andrews v. U.S., 108 Fed. Cl. 150, 155–156 (2012)
Arizona v. U.S., 567 U.S. ___, 132 S.Ct. 2492, 2502 (2012)
Brown v. U.S., 73 F.3d 1100 (Fed. Cir. 1996)
CA. S. Bill 142 (September 9, 2015)
Charleston, West Virginia Code Sec. 78-132
Chicago, Illinois, Municipal Code of Chicago, 10-36-400
City of Burbank v. Lockheed Air Terminal, 411 U.S. 624 (1973)
Drone Crashes Through Window, Hits Man’s Head, ABC News., http://abcnews.go.com/International/drone-crashes-window-hits-mans-head/story?id=38253589, April 8, (2016)
FAA “No Drone Zone” Digital Toolkit., https://www.faa.gov/uas/where_to_fly/no_drone_zone
FAA Administrator Michael Huerta, Speech “Unmanned Aircraft Systems” UAS Symposium Remarks, April 19, 2016, https:/www.faa.gov/news_story.cfm?newsId=20254
FAA Administrator Michael Huerta, Speech “Unmanned Aircraft Systems, UAS Symposium Opening Remarks – A Shared Vision, A Shared Responsibility,” March 27, 2017, https:/www.faa.gov/news_story.cfm?newsId=21554
FAA Administrator Michael Huerta, Speech: White House Drone Day, Aug. 2, 2016., http://www.faa.gov/news/speeches/news_story.cfm?newsId=20594
FAA Certificate of Operations or Waiver (“Blanket” COA)., https://www.faa.gov/news/updates/?newsId=82245 and https://www.faa.gov/news/updates/?newsId=85264
FAA Drone Advisory Committee Membership, August 31, 2016., http://www.rtca.org/Files/Miscellaneous%20Files/DAC%20Membership%20Roster.pdf
FAA Drone Advisory Committee September 16, 2016 Meeting Agenda, http://www.rtca.org/Files/Committee0Agendas/DAC0Agenda_Sep01602016.pdf
FAA Extension, Safety and Security Act of 2016 (Pub. L. No. 114–190) (2016 Act)
FAA Integration of Civil Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) in the National Airspace System (NAS) Roadmap, FAA, 1st Ed. 2013
FAA Interpretation of the Special Rule for Model Aircraft, (http://www.faa.gov/uas/media/model_aircraft_spec_rule.pdf)
FAA Law Enforcement Guidance for Suspected Unauthorized UAS Operations., https://www.faa.gov/uas/resources/law_enforcement/media/FAA_UAS-DRONE-LE_reference_card.pdf
FAA Legal Interpretation to Earl Lawrence, Director, Unmanned Aircraft Systems Integration Office from Reginald C. Govan, Chief Counsel (May 4, 2016), https://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/agc/pol_adjudication/agc200/Interpretations/data/interps/2016/Lawrence-AUS-1 - (2016) Legal Interpretation.pdf
FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (Pub.L. 112–95) (2012 Act)
FAA Office of the Chief Counsel, UAS Fact Sheet, 2015), http://www.faa.gov/uas/resources/uas_regulations_policy/media/uas_fact_sheet_final.pdf
FAA Order 1110.150, Small Unmanned Aircraft System Aviation Rulemaking Committee, (April 10, 2008), http://www.faa.gov/regulations_policies/rulemaking/committees/documents/media/SUASARC-4102008.pdf
FAA Performance Standards and Requirements for Micro Unmanned Aircraft Systems, Aviation Rulemaking Committee (Feb. 24, 2016), http://www.faa.gov/regulations_policies/rulemaking/committees/documents/media/MUASARC-02242016.pdf
FAA Pope Francis’ Visit “No Drone Zone,” Cities Hosting the Papal Visit are No Drone Zones, Sept. 15, (2015), https://www.faa.gov/news/press_releases/news_story.cfm?newsId=19474
FAA Strategic Initiatives., https://www.faa.gov/about/plans_reports/media/FAA_Strategic_Initiatives_Summary.pdf)
FAA Super Bowl “No Drone Zone,”. https://www.faa.gov/news/updates/?newsId=84766
FAA UAS Flight Restrictions Over Military Bases., https://www.news/update/?newsId=87865
FAA UAS Flight Restrictions Over Military Bases, available via an online interactive map and in the FAA’s B4YFLYmoblie app (https://www.faa.gov.uas/where_to_fly/b4yfly/
FAA UAS Interim Final Rule, Registration and Marking Requirements for Small Unmanned Aircraft, 80 Fed. Reg. 78,594 (Dec. 16, 2015)
FAA UAS Notification and Authorization Request for Information – Information sharing Strategies and Demonstrations for Small UAS Operations, September 22, 2016, together with an “Initial Set of Requirements for Automated ATC Notification Authorization Processes – DRAFT 9–13-2016, https://faaco.faa.gov/index.cfm.announcement/view/25596
FAA UAS Registration Task Force, 80 Fed. Reg. 63912, 63913 (October 22, 2015))
FAA UAS Registration Task Force, Aviation Rulemaking Committee, (Oct. 20, 2015), http://www.faa.gov/regulations_policies/rulemaking/committees/documents/media/UASRTFARC-102015.pdf)
FAA UAS Safety Team, October 18–19, 2016., http://www.cast-safety.org/about_vmg.cfm
FAA UAS Safety Team, The White House, FACT SHEET, New Commitments to Accelerate the Safe Integration of Unmanned Aircraft Systems (Aug. 2, 2016), https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2016/08/02/fact-sheet-new-commitments-accelerate-safe-integration-unmanned-aircraft
FAA UAS Symposium Agenda, April 19–20, 2016., http://commons.erau.edu/faa-uas-symposium/2016-printable-agenda.pdf
FAA UAS Symposium Agenda, March 27–29, 2017., https://higherlogicdownload.s3.amazonaws.com/AUVSI/8b5851af-2cd7-4c92-aa3a-374ef593e315/UploadedImages/2017/PDFs/FAA_Symposium_Agenda_BRANDED_03–21-17.pdf
FAA v. Haughwout, U.S.D.C., D. Conn. July 18, 2016, No. 3:16-cv-358
FAA Will Release Maps to Speed Up Drone Authorization Applications., https://www.faa.gov/news/update/?newsId=87867
French v. Pan Am Express, Inc., 869 F.2d 1 (1st Cir. 1989)
Goodspeed Airport, LLC v. East Haddam Inland Wetlands and Watercourses Commission, 634 F.3d 206, 212 (2d Cir. 2011); 681 F.Supp.2d 182, 201–202 (D. Conn. 2010)
Governor Deal Vetoes Drone Legislation. May 3, 2016., http://airport.blog.ajc.com/2016/05/03/gov-deal-vetoes-drone-legislation
Griggs v. Allegheny County, 369 U.S. 84 (1962)
Huerta v. Pirker., http://www.ntsb.gov/legal/alj/Documents/5730.pdf
C. King, in FAA Drone Laws Start to Clash with Stricter Local Rules. N.Y. Times, Dec. 27, 2015
MD Code, Econ. Dev § 14–301
Med-Trans Corp. v. Benton, 581 F. Supp. 2d 721, 740 (E.D.N.C. 2008)
Miami, Florida, Code of Ordinances, Order No. 13581, §37–12 (2015)
Montalvo v. Spirit Airlines, 508 F.3d 464 (9th Cir. 2007)
Morales v. Trans World Airlines, Inc., 504 U.S. 374, 386–87 (1992)
N.C.G.S. § 63-95
N.H. HB 602 (2015)
N.J.S.A. 52:9X-12
NASA UTM. website, https://utm.arc.nasa.gov/index.shtml. Feb. 10, 201, and http://www.techtimes.com/articles/153441/20160426/nasa-faa-complete-most-complex-drone-traffic-management-test-juggling-22-drones-at-once.htm
Next Gen, Low-Visibility Operations., https://www.faa.gov/nextgen/update/operator_investments_and_airports/operator_investments/low_visibility_operations/. Last Modified 15 Apr 2016
ORS § 837.380 (2013)
ORS § 837.385
ORS § 837.995
Pueblo of Sandia ex rel. Chaves v. Smith, 497 F.2d 1043 (10th Cir. 1974)
R.I. Bill H5293 (Regular Session, 2015)
SB 142, September 9, 2015, Letter to Members of the California State Senate from the Office of the Governor, http://www.gov.ca.gov/docs/SB_142_Veto_Meessage.pdf)
Section 33 Exemptions, Commercial UAS Exemptions by the Numbers, http://www.auvsi.org/advocacy/exemptions70
Section 333 Exemptions, news article http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/faa-approves-5000-section-333-exemption-petition-grants-gowdy-brothers-aerospace-consults-on-next-steps-300259184.html
Singer v. Newton, U.S.D.C., D. Ma., filed Jan. 17, 2017
Skysign International, Inc. v. City and County of Honolulu, 276 F.3d 1109, 1117 (9th Cir. 2002)
Testimony of Earl Lawrence, Director, FAA UAS Integration Office, U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation (March 15, 2017), https://www.faa.gov/news/testimony/news_story.cfm?newsId=21494)
Testimony of Peggy Gilligan, FAA Associate Administrator for Aviation Safety, U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation, Subcommittee on Aviation Operations, Safety and Security (March 24, 2015) available at https://www.hsdl.org/?view&did=764961
Texas HB 1481. http://www.legis.state.tx.us/tlodocs/84R/billtext/html/HB01481F.htm
Texas HB 3628. http://www.legis.state.tx.us/tlodocs/84R/billtext/html/HB03628F.htm)
The Self-Piloting Hobby Drone Has Arrived, Bloomberg, http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-03-01/chinese-company-builds-autonomous-consumer-drone, March 1, 2016
UAS Autonomous Collision Avoidance System, Office of Naval Research., http://www.onr.navy.mil/en/Media-Center/Fact-Sheets/UAS-Autonomous-Collision.aspx. Accessed 22 Aug 2016
Uber’s First Self-Driving Fleet Arrives in Pittsburgh This Month, Bloomberg., http://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2016-08-18/uber-s-first-self-driving-fleet-arrives-in-pittsburgh-this-month-is06r7on, August 18, 2016
United States Senate, S. 2658, passed April 19, 2016
United States Senate, S. Amdt. 3558 to H.R. 636 and to S. Amdt 3464 (introduced April 16, 2016)
United States v. Causby, 328 U.S. 256 (1946)
Utah HB3003/2016/3rd Special Session (2016, July 17),https://www.legiscan.com/UT/bill/HB3003/2016/X3
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG (outside the USA)
About this entry
Cite this entry
Govan, R.C. et al. (2018). Aviation Law: Incorporating Unmanned Operations. In: Valavanis, K., Vachtsevanos, G. (eds) Handbook of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32193-6_154-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32193-6_154-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-32193-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-32193-6
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsReference Module Computer Science and Engineering