Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Three-Factor Model of Personality

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences

  • 230 Accesses

Synonyms

Characteristic patterns; Individual differences; Personality theory

Introduction

Resolution of the overstated person-situation debate during the mid-1980s in favor of the stability of individual differences across contexts led to increased interest in personality research and application (e.g., Goldberg 1993; Matthews and Deary 1998). Developing ideas about the consistency of personality (e.g., Epstein 1983), increasing computing power, and improved psychological, psychometric, and statistical methodology (e.g., Kline 1993, 1994) gave researchers confidence in personality research as a science. While much research has focused on developing an agreed taxonomy of personality (Brody and Ehrlichman 1998; McCrae and Costa 1996), other research led to the development of psychobiological models (e.g., Gray and McNaughton 2000; Eysenck 1967; Zuckerman 1991), statistical and lexical models such as the Big Five (Digman 1990) and HEXACO (Ashton et al. 2004), socio-cognitive models...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allik, J., Realo, A., & McCrae, R. R. (2013). Universality of the five-factor model of personality. In P. T. Costa Jr. & T. A. Widiger (Eds.), Personality disorders and the five-factor model of personality (3rd ed., pp. 61–74). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashton, M. C., Lee, K., Perugini, M., Szarota, P., de Vries, R. E., Di Blas, L., …, & De Raad, B. (2004). A six-factor structure of personality-descriptive adjectives: Solutions from psycholexical studies in seven languages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 356–366. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.86.2.356.

  • Block, J. (1995). A contrarian view of the five-factor approach to personality description. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 187–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.2.187

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Block, J. (2010). The five-factor framing of personality and beyond: Some ruminations. Psychological Inquiry, 21, 2–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/10478401003596626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borsboom, D., Mellenbergh, G. J., & van Heerden, J. (2003). The theoretical status of latent variables. Psychological Review, 110, 203–219.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brand, C. (1994). How many dimensions of personality? ‘The Big Five’, ‘The Gigantic Three’ or ‘The Comprehensive Two’? Psychologica Belgica, 34, 257–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briggs, S. (1989). The optimal level of measurement for personality constructs. In D. Buss & N. Cantor (Eds.), Personality psychology: Recent trends and emerging directions. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brody, N., & Ehrlichman, H. (1998). Personality psychology. London: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. B., & Hawley, C. W. (1982). Study habits and Eysenck's theory of extraversion introversion. Journal of Research in Personality, 16, 139–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Claridge, G. (2016). Hans Eysenck’s contribution to our understanding of personality and psychological disorders: A personal view. Personality and Individual Differences, 103, 93–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cloninger, C. R. (1987). A systematic method for clinical description and classification of personality variants. Archives of General Psychiatry, 44, 573–588.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cloninger, C. R., Svrakic, D. M., & Przybeck, T. R. (1993). A psychobiological model of temperament and character. Archives of General Psychiatry, 50, 975–990. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1993.01820240059008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, M., Jackson, C., Walker, B., O’Connor, P., & Gardiner, E. (2017). Integrating the context-appropriate balanced attention model and reinforcement sensitivity theory: Towards a domain-general personality process model. Psychological Bulletin, 143, 91–106. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000082

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Corr, P. J., DeYoung, C. G., & McNaughton, N. (2013). Motivation and personality: A neuropsychological perspective. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7, 158–175. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa, P., & McCrae, R. (1992). Four ways five factors are basic. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 653–665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) manual. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa, P., & McCrae, R. (1995). Primary traits of Eysenck’s P-E-N system: Three and five factor solutions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 308–317.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Deary, I. J., & Matthews, G. (1993). Personality traits are alive and well. Psychologist, 6, 299–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Depue, R. A., & Collins, P. F. (1999). Neurobiology of the structure of personality: Dopamine, facilitation of incentive motivation, and extraversion. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 491–569. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X99002046

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Depue, R. A., & Morrone-Strupinsky, J. V. (2005). A neurobehavioral model of affiliative bonding: Implications for conceptualizing a human trait of affiliation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 313–395. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x05000063

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • DeYoung, C. G. (2010). Personality neuroscience and the biology of traits. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4, 1165–1180. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00327.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeYoung, C. G. (2013). The neuromodulator of exploration: A unifying theory of the role of dopamine in personality. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00762.

  • DeYoung, C. G. (2015). Cybernetic Big Five theory. Journal of Research in Personality, 56, 33–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2014.07.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeYoung, C. G., Quilty, L. C., & Peterson, J. B. (2007). Between facets and domains: 10 aspects of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 880–896. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.5.880

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • DeYoung, C. G., Hirsh, J. B., Shane, M. S., Papademetris, X., Rajeevan, N., & Gray, J. R. (2010). Testing predictions from personality neuroscience: Brain structure and the Big Five. Psychological Science, 21, 820–828. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610370159

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Digman, J. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the five factor model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41, 1040–1048.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, A. J., & Thrash, T. M. (2002). Approach-avoidance motivation in personality: Approach and avoidance temperaments and goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 804–818. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.5.804

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, A. J., & Thrash, T. M. (2010). Approach and avoidance temperament as basic dimensions of personality. Journal of Personality, 78, 865–906. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00636.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, S. (1983). Aggregation and beyond: Some basic issues on the prediction of behavior. Journal of Personality, 51, 360–392. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1983.tb00338.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, H. (1967). The biological basis of personality. Springfield: Charles C. Thomas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, H., & Wilson, G. D. (1975). Know Your Own Personality, London: Temple Smith.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, H. J. (1977). You and neurosis. London: Temple Smith.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, S. B., Eysenck, H. J., & Barrett, P. (1985). A revised version of the psychoticism scale. Personality and individual differences, 6(1), 21–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, H., & Wilson, G. (1991). The Eysenck Personality Profiler (1st ed.). Sydney: Cymeon. (Also available from C. Jackson).

    Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, H. (1992). Four ways five factors are not basic. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 667–674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, H. (1996). Personality and the experimental study of education. European Journal of Personality, 10, 427–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, H. (1997). Personality and experimental psychology: The unification of psychology and the possibility of a paradigm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1224–1237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, S. B. G. (1976). Psychoticism as a dimension of personality. London: Hodder & Stoughton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, H., & Wilson, G. (1991). The Eysenck Personality Profiler (1st ed.). Sydney: Cymeon. (Also available from C. Jackson).

    Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, H., & Wilson, G. (1999). The Eysenck Personality Profiler (2nd ed.). Sydney: Cymeon. (Also available from C. Jackson).

    Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, H., Barrett, P., Wilson, G., & Jackson, C. (1992). Primary trait measurement of the 21 components of the P-E-N system. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 8, 109–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, H., Wilson, G., & Jackson, C. (1997). The Eysenck Personality Profiler (short) (1st ed.). Sydney: Cymeon. (Also available from C. Jackson).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleeson, W., & Jayawickreme, E. (2015). Whole trait theory. Journal of Research in Personality, 56, 82–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2014.10.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Francis, L. J., Robbins, M., Jackson, C. J., & Jones, S. H. (2000). Personality theory and male Anglican clergy: The EPP. Contact, 133, 27–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francis, L. J., Jones, S. H., Jackson, C. J., & Robbins, M. (2001). The feminine personality profile of male Anglican clergy in Britain and Ireland: A study employing the Eysenck Personality Profiler. Review of Religious Research, 43, 14–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, H. S. (2007). Personality, disease, and self-healing. In H. S. Friedman & R. C. Silver (Eds.), Foundations of health psychology (pp. 172–199). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furnham, A., Forde, L., & Cotter, T. (1998a). Personality scores and test taking style. Personality and Individual Differences, 24, 19–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furnham, A., Forde, L., & Cotter, T. (1998b). Personality and intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 24, 187–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furnham, A., Forde, L., & Ferrari, K. (1999). Personality and work motivation. Personality and Individual Differences, 26(6), 1035–1043.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furnham, A., Jackson, C. J., Forde, L., & Cotter, T. (2001). Correlates of the Eysenck Personality Profiler. Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 587–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardiner, E., & Jackson, C. (2015). Personality and learning processes underlying maverickism. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 30, 726–740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geen, R. G. (1984). Preferred stimulation levels in introverts and extraverts: Effects on arousal and performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 1303–1312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, L. (1993). The structure of phenotypic personality traits. American Psychologist, 48, 26–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gorsuch, R. (1974). Factor analysis. London: W.B. Saunders.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, J. A. (1970). The psychophysiological basis of introversion-extraversion. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 8, 249–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7967(70)90069-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, J. A. (1987). The psychology of fear and stress (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, J. A. (2004). Consciousness: Creeping up on the hard problems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, J. A., & McNaughton, N. (2000). The neuropsychology of anxiety: An enquiry into the functions of the septo-hippocampal system (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hampson, S. (2012). Personality processes: Mechanisms by which personality traits “get outside the skin”. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 315–339.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, C., & Wilson, G. D. (1993). Mad, bad or sad? The personality of bikers. Personality and Individual Differences, 14(1), 241–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, C. J. (2002). Mapping Gray’s model of personality onto the Eysenck Personality Profiler (EPP). Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 495–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, C. J. (2008). Measurement issues concerning a personality model spanning temperament, character and experience. In G. Boyle, G. Matthews, & D. Saklofske (Eds.), Handbook of personality and testing (pp. 73–93). Los Angeles: Sage Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, C. J. (2011). How sensation seeking provides a common basis for functional and dysfunctional outcomes. Journal of Research in Personality, 45, 29–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, C. J., & Corr, P. J. (1998). Personality-performance correlations at work: Individual and aggregate levels of analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 24, 815–820.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, C. J., & Francis, L. J. (2004). Primary scale structure of the Eysenck Personality Profiler. Current Psychology, 22, 295–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, C. J., & Wilson, G. D. (1994). Group obsessiveness as a moderator of dissimulation on neuroticism scales. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 10, 224–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, C. J., Furnham, A., & Lawty-Jones, M. (1999). Relationship between indecisiveness and neuroticism: The moderating effect of a tough-minded culture. Personality and Individual Differences, 27, 789–800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, C. J., Furnham, A., Forde, L., & Cotter, T. (2000). The dimensional structure of the Eysenck Personality Profiler. British Journal of Psychology, 91, 223–240.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, C. J., Izadikah, Z., & Oei, T. (2012). Mechanisms underlying REBT in mood disordered patients: Predicting depression from the hybrid model of learning. Journal of Affective Disorders, 139, 30–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Judge, T. A., & Ilies, R. (2002). Relationship of personality to performance motivation: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 797–807. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.87.4.797

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kern, M. L., & Friedman, H. S. (2008). Do conscientious individuals live longer? A quantitative review. Health Psychology, 27, 505–512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.27.5.505

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kline, P. (1993). The handbook of psychological testing. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kline, P. (1994). An easy guide to factor analysis. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knyazev, G. G., Pylkova, L. V., Slobodskoy-Plusnin, J. Y., Bocharov, A. V., & Ushakov, D. V. (2015). Personality and neural efficiency theory. Personality and Individual Differences, 86, 67–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loehlin, J. C., McCrae, R. R., Costa, P. T., & John, O. P. (1998). Heritabilities of common and measure-specific components of the big five personality factors. Journal of Research in Personality, 32, 431–453. https://doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.1998.2225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, G. (2016). Traits, cognitive processes and adaptation: An elegy for Hans Eysenck’s personality theory. Personality and Individual Differences, 103, 61–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, G., & Deary, I. (1998). Personality traits. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, G., Deary, I., & Whiteman, M. (2003). Personality traits. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McAdams, D. P. (1992). The five-factor model in personality: A critical appraisal. Journal of Personality, 60, 329–361. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00976.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R., & Costa, P. (1996). Toward a new generation of personality theories: Theoretical contexts for the five-factor model. In J. S. Wiggins (Ed.), The five-factor model of personality: Theoretical perspectives. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie, J., Tindell, G., & French, J. (1997). The great triumvirate: Agreement between lexically and psycho-physiologically based models of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 22, 269–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, R. L., & Kumari, V. (2016). Hans Eysenck’s interface between the brain and personality: Modern evidence on the cognitive neuroscience of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 103, 74–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moosbrugger, H., & Fischbach, A. (2002). Evaluating the dimensionality of the Eysenck Personality Profiler – German version (EPP-D). Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 191–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00095-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moutafi, J., Furnham, A., & Crump, J. (2006). What facets of openness and conscientiousness predict fluid intelligence score? Learning and Individual Differences, 16, 31–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2005.06.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muris, P., Schmidt, H., Merckelbach, H., & Rassin, E. (2000). Reliability, factor structure and validity of the Dutch Eysenck Personality Profiler. Personality and Individual Differences, 29, 857–868. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00237-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, P. C., & Jackson, C. J. (2008). Learning to be saints or sinners: The indirect pathway from sensation seeking to behavior through mastery orientation. Journal of Personality, 76, 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrides, K. V., Jackson, C. J., Furnham, A., & Levine, S. Z. (2003). Exploring issues of personality measurement and structure through the development of a short form of the Eysenck Personality Profiler. Journal of Personality Assessment, 81, 271–280.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Presnall, J. R. (2013). Disorders of personality: Clinical treatment from a five-factor model perspective. In T. A. Widiger & P. T. Costa Jr. (Eds.), Personality disorders and the five-factor model of personality (3rd ed., pp. 395–408). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Revelle, W. (2016). Hans Eysenck: Personality theorist. Personality and Individual Differences, 103, 32–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, B. W., & DelVecchio, W. F. (2000). The rank-order consistency of personality traits from childhood to old age: A quantitative review of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.126.1.3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, B. W., Kuncel, N. R., Shiner, R., Caspi, A., & Goldberg, L. R. (2007). The power of personality: The comparative validity of personality traits, socioeconomic status, and cognitive ability for predicting important life outcomes. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2, 313–345. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00047.x

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Salgado, J. (1997). The five-factor model of personality and job performance in the European Community. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 30–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smillie, L. D., Pickering, A. D., & Jackson, C. J. (2006). The new reinforcement sensitivity theory: Implications for personality measurement. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 320–335. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr1004_3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Soldz, S., & Vaillant, G. E. (1999). The big five personality traits and the life course: A 45-year longitudinal study. Journal of Research in Personality, 33, 208–232. https://doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.1999.2243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stelmack, R. M. (1981). The psychophysiology of extraversion and neuroticism. In H. J. Eysenck (Ed.), A model for personality (pp. 38–64). Heidelberg: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stelmack, R. M. (1998). H. J. Eysenck’s contribution to the causal basis of personality. Psihologija, 3, 193–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stelmack, R. M., & Houlihan, M. (1995). Event-related potentials, personality and intelligence: Concepts, issues and evidence. In D. H. Saklofske & M. Zaidner (Eds.), International handbook of personality and intelligence (pp. 349–365). New York: Plenum.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tellegen, A. (1993). Folk concepts and psychological concepts of personality and personality disorder. Psychological Inquiry, 4, 122–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uher, J. (2013). Personality psychology: Lexical approaches, assessment methods, and trait concepts reveal only half of the story – Why it is time for a paradigm shift. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 47, 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-013-9230-6

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins, J. (1973). Personality and prediction: Principles of personality assessment. Reading: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, G., & Jackson, C. (1994). The personality of physicists. Personality and Individual Differences, 16, 187–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamagata, S., Suzuki, A., Ando, J., Ono, Y., Kijima, N., Yoshimura, K., … Jang, K. L. (2006). Is the genetic structure of human personality universal? A cross-cultural twin study from North America, Europe, and Asia. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 987–998. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.6.987.

  • Zhao, H., & Seibert, S. E. (2006). The big five personality dimensions and entrepreneurial status: A meta-analytical review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 259–271. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.2.259

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, M. (1991). The psychobiology of personality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, M. (1992). What is a basic factor and which factors are basic? Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 675–681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Management, UNSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia

    Chris J. Jackson & Man-Zung Fung

Authors
  1. Chris J. Jackson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Man-Zung Fung
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chris J. Jackson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Oakland University, Rochester, USA

    Virgil Zeigler-Hill

  2. Oakland University, Rochester, USA

    Todd K. Shackelford

Section Editor information

  1. Department of Educational Sciences, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy

    Patrizia Velotti

  2. Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy

    Patrizia Velotti

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Jackson, C.J., Fung, MZ. (2018). Three-Factor Model of Personality. In: Zeigler-Hill, V., Shackelford, T. (eds) Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_870-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_870-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-28099-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-28099-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation