Skip to main content

Novatores: Rejecting Aristotle and Forging a New Philosophy in the Seventeenth Century

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
  • 87 Accesses

Synonyms

Modern philosophy; New philosophy

Introduction

The early modern period was a time of innovation and change, generally considered the beginning of science and philosophy as we now understand it. There have been numerous historical debates about how this happened. In the popular literature, the textbooks, and the classroom, the focus has been on certain great figures like Kepler and Galileo, Descartes and Bacon, and Hobbes and Harvey, among others, who are taken to be principally responsible for the emergence of the new ideas and perspectives. But in the early seventeenth century, things looked somewhat different. When the figures we now consider the first moderns emerged, it was in the context of a host of other figures, called by their contemporaries the “novatores” or “innovators.” When this historiographical category emerged in the early seventeenth century, though, it was not intended as a compliment. Though it will become something positive later in the century, when first...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  • Cavaillé JP (2009) Libérer le libertinage: Une catégorie à l’épreuve des sources. Annales: Histoire, Sciences Sociales 64:45–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Vries G (1683) Introductionis historicae ad Cartesii philosophiam pars secunda. Meinardus à Dreunen, Utrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzinger H (1963) Enchiridion symbolorum, 32nd edn. Herder, Rome/Freiburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Fumaroli M (ed) (2001) La Querelle des Anciens et des Modernes. Gallimard, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Furetière A (1690) Dictionnaire universel, 3 vols. A and R Leers, The Hague/Rotterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Garber D (2002) Defending Aristotle/defending society in early 17th C Paris. In: Zittel C, Detel C (eds) Wissensideale und Wissenskulturen in der frühen Neuzeit (Ideals and culture of knowledge in early modern Europe). Akademie-Verlag, Berlin, pp 135–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Garber D (2016) Why the scientific revolution wasn’t a revolution and why it matters. In: Richards RJ, Daston L (eds) Kuhn’s Structure of scientific revolutions at fifty. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 133–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant E (ed) (1974) A sourcebook in medieval science. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Krumenacker Y (2006) La généalogie imaginaire de la Réforme protestante. Rev Hist 308:259–289

    Google Scholar 

  • Kusukawa S (1995) The transformation of natural philosophy: the case of Philip Melanchthon. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Launoy J (1653) De varia Aristotelis in academia parisiensi fortuna … liber. Edmund Martin, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibniz GW, Loemker L (ed and trans) (1976) Philosophical papers and letters. D. Reidel, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukács L (1986) Ratio atque institutio studiorum Societatis Iesu (1586, 1591, 1599). Monumenta Paedagogica Societatis Iesu, vol 5. Institutum Historicum Societatis Iesu, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Malebranche N, Lennon T, Olscamp P (ed and trans) (1997) The search after truth and elucidations of the search after truth. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin C (2014) Subverting Aristotle: religion, history, and philosophy in early modern science. Johns Hopkins, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercer C (1990) The seventeenth-century debate between the Moderns and the Aristotelians: Leibniz and Philosophia Reformata. In: Marchlewitz I, Heinekamp A (eds) Leibniz’ Auseinandersetzung mit Vorgängern und Zeitgenossen. Franz Steiner Verlag, Stuttgart, pp 18–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Mersenne M (1623) Quaestiones celeberrimae in Genesim. Sebastian Cramoisy, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Mersenne M (1625) La vérité des sciences. Toussainct du Bray, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Morin JB (1624) Refutation des theses erronees d’Anthoine Villon … et Estienne de Claves. Chez l’Autheur, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascal B (1910) Thoughts, letters, minor works. PF Collier and Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Pullapilly CK (1975) Caesar Baronius, Counter-Reformation historian. University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame

    Google Scholar 

  • Randall J (1631) Twenty nine lectures of the Church very necessary for the consolation and support of Gods Church. Felix Kyngston for Nathanael Newbery, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Saur G (1708) Relatio historica judiciorum et censurarum adversus philosophiam anti-peripateticam. JM Kleyer, Würtzburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt C (1983) Aristotle and the Renaissance. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Thomasius J (1693) Dissertationes LXIII. JF Zeiterlus, Halle an der Saale

    Google Scholar 

  • Verbeek T (1988) La Querelle d’Utrecht: René Descartes et Martin Schoock. Impressions nouvelles, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Wotton W (1694) Reflections upon ancient and modern learning. J Leake for P Buck, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Garber .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Garber, D. (2019). Novatores: Rejecting Aristotle and Forging a New Philosophy in the Seventeenth Century. In: Jalobeanu, D., Wolfe, C. (eds) Encyclopedia of Early Modern Philosophy and the Sciences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20791-9_496-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20791-9_496-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-20791-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-20791-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

Publish with us

Policies and ethics