Skip to main content

Principle of Least Action

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Early Modern Philosophy and the Sciences
  • 48 Accesses

Introduction

The principle of least action is a general variational principle for dynamical systems formulated in the mid-eighteenth century by Maupertuis, Euler, and Lagrange. Its invention gave rise to an intense controversy over priority, famous even outside scientific circles because of the intervention of Voltaire and Frederick II of Prussia. Today, a variety of action principles provide the basis of several theories of mathematical physics.

Leibniz

While the vague idea that Nature achieves its goals with minimum effort goes back at least to Aristotle and Hero of Alexandria, the first mathematically and physically significant formulation of a minimum principle, that a ray of light follows the path of least time, was due to Pierre de Fermat (1662). Fermat’s principle beautifully explained the Snell-Descartes law of refraction, but went against the Cartesian (and, later, Newtonian) notion that light moves faster through denser media.

In 1682 Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz devised a way...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bachelard S (1958) Maupertuis et le principe de moindre action. Thalès 9:3–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Beeson D (1992) Maupertuis: an intellectual biography. Voltaire Foundation, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Breger H (2016) Kontinuum, Analysis, Informales – Beiträge zur Mathematik und Philosophie von Leibniz. Springer Spektrum, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brunet P (1929) Maupertuis, 2 vols. Blanchard, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunet P (1938) Étude historique sur le principe de la moindre action. Hermann, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Calinger RS (2016) Leonhard Euler: mathematical genius in the Enlightenment. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Caparrini S, Fraser C (2013) Mechanics in the eighteenth century. In: Buchwald J, Fox R (eds) The Oxford handbook of the history of physics. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 358–405

    Google Scholar 

  • Carathéodory C (ed) (1952) Leonhardi Euleri Opera omnia (I)24: Leonhardi Euleri Methodus inveniendi lineas curvas maximi minimive proprietate gaudentes sive solutio problematis isoperimetrici latissimo sensu accepti. Orell Füssli Verlag, Zürich

    Google Scholar 

  • Costabel P (1979) L’affaire Maupertuis – König et les questions de fait. In: Berninger EH, Figala K (eds) Arithmos-Arrythmos: Skizzen aus der Wissenschaftsgeschichte, Festschrift für Joachim Otto Fleckenstein zum 65. Geburtstag. Minerva, München, pp 29–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Costabel P, Winter E, Grigorijan AT, Juškevič AP (eds) (1986) Leonhardi Euleri Opera omnia (IV)6: Commercium [epistolicum] cum P.-L.M. de Maupertuis et Frédéric II. Birkhäuser, Basel

    Google Scholar 

  • Darrigol R (2012) A history of optics: from Greek antiquity to the nineteenth century. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Diaz PMC (1999) Euler’s “harmony” between the principles of “rest” and “least action”: the conceptual making of analytical mechanics. Arch Hist Exact Sci 54:67–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donough J (2010) Leibniz’s optics and contingency in nature. Perspect Sci 18:432–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dugas R (1950) Histoire de la mécanique. Éditions du Griffon, Neuchâtel

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleckenstein JO (ed) (1957) Leonhardi Euleri Opera omnia (II)5: Commentationes mechanicae [ad] principia mechanica [pertinentes]. Orell Füssli Verlag, Zürich

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleischauer C, Voltaire (1964) L’Akakia de Voltaire: édition critique par Charles Fleischauer. Stud Voltaire Eighteenth Century 30:7–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Freguglia P, Giaquinta M (2016) The early period of the calculus of variations. Birkhäuser, Basel

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Goldenbaum U (2015) Ein Plädoyer für die Echtheit des angeblich gefälschten Leibnizbriefes. Wehrhahn, Hannover

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstine HH (1980) A history of the calculus of variations from the 17th through the 19th century. Springer, NeW York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Helmholtz H (1887) Zur Geschichte des Princips der kleinsten Action. Sitzungsberichte der Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin 1887:225–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Jourdain PEB (1912) Maupertuis and the principle of least action. Monist 22:414–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kabitz W (1913) Über eine in Gotha aufgefundene Abschrift des von S. König in seinem Streite mit Maupertuis und der Akademie veröffentlichten, seinerzeit für unecht erklärten Leibnizbriefes. Sitzungsberichte der Königlich Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften 2:632–638

    Google Scholar 

  • Kneser A (1928) Das Prinzip der kleinsten Wirkung von Leibniz bis zur Gegenwart. Teubner, Leipzig/Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Knobloch E (2008) Das große Spargesetz der Natur: Zur Tragikkomodie zwischen Euler, Voltaire und Maupertuis. In: Biegel G, Klein A, Sonar T (eds) Leonhard Euler 1707–1783, Mathematiker – Mechaniker – Physiker. Braunschweigisches Landesmuseum, Braunschweig, pp 79–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Sueur A (1896) Maupertuis et ses correspondants. Impr. Notre-Dame des Prés, Montreuil-sur-Mer

    Google Scholar 

  • Mach E (1883) Die Mechanik in ihrer Entwickelung, historisch-kritisch dargestellt. Brockhaus, Leipzig

    Google Scholar 

  • de Maupertuis PLM (1756) Oeuvres de Mr. de Maupertuis: nouvelle édition corrigée et augmentée, 4 vols. Imprimerie de Louis Buisson, Lyon

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer A (1877) Geschichte des Princips der kleinsten Action. Veit & Comp, Leipzig

    Google Scholar 

  • Panza M (1995) De la nature épargnante aux forces généreuses: le principe de moindre action entre mathématiques et métaphysique. Maupertuis et Euler, 1740–1751. Revue d’histoire des sciences 48:435–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pomeau R (ed) (1995) Voltaire en son temps, 2 vols. Fayard, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Pulte H (1989) Das Prinzip der kleinsten Wirkung und die Kraftkonzeptionen der rationalen Mechanik: eine Untersuchung zur Grundlegungsproblematik bei Leonhard Euler, Pierre Louis Moreau de Maupertuis und Joseph Louis Lagrange. Steiner, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Radelet-De Grave P (1998) La moindre action comme lien entre la philosophie naturelle et la mécanique analytique: continuités d’un questionnement. Llull; Revista de la Sociedad Española de Historia de las Ciencias y de las Técnicas 21:439–484

    Google Scholar 

  • Szabó I (1987) Geschichte der mechanischen Prinzipien und ihrer wichtigsten Anwendungen. Birkhauser, Basel

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Terrall M (2002) The man who flattened the earth: Maupertuis and the sciences in the Enlightenment. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tuffet J, Voltaire (1967) Histoire du Docteur Akakia et du natif de St-Malo; édition critique avec une introduction et un commentaire par Jacques Tuffet. Nizet, Paris

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sandro Caparrini .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Caparrini, S. (2020). Principle of Least Action. In: Jalobeanu, D., Wolfe, C. (eds) Encyclopedia of Early Modern Philosophy and the Sciences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20791-9_38-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20791-9_38-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-20791-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-20791-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

Publish with us

Policies and ethics