Name of Concept
Oppression in Couple and Family Therapy.
Introduction
Oppression is a term used to “embody the interlocking forces that create and sustain injustice” (Bell 2016, p. 5). Occurring on institutional, interpersonal, and intrapersonal levels, oppression is often rooted in identification according to socially ascribed categories (e.g., race, gender, sexuality, and socioeconomic status). The experience of marginalization in everyday life based on one’s identity status can be the cause of significant distress and is often relevant to the work done in psychotherapy. In order to adhere to the vision of justice and the mandate for the provision of competent care, culturally and otherwise, therapists are tasked with not only cultivating awareness of when systems of advantage and disadvantage are influencing client functioning and the therapy process but also intervening to facilitate growth and change in spite of them. Further, within the couple and family therapy context, with...
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Bell, L. A. (2016). Theoretical foundations for social justice education. In M. Adams, L. A. Bell, D. J. Goodman, & K. Y. Joshi (Eds.), Teaching for diversity and social justice (3rd ed., p. 5). New York: Routledge.
Bordin, E. (1979). The generalizability of the psychoanalytic concept of the working alliance. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 16, 252–260.
Knudson-Martin, C. (2013). Why power matters: Creating a foundation of mutual support in couple relationships. Family Process, 52(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12011.
Knudson-Martin, C., & Huenergardt, D. (2010). A socio-emotional approach to couple therapy: Linking social context and couple interaction. Family Process, 49, 369–386.
Owen, J. (2013). Early career perspectives on psychotherapy research and practice: Psychotherapist effects, multicultural orientation, and couple interventions. Psychotherapy, 50(4), 496–502. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034617.
Parker, E. O., & McDowell, T. (2016). Integrating social justice into the practice of CBFT: A critical look at family schemas. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmft.12205.
Pinsof, W. M. (1994). An integrative systems perspective on the therapeutic alliance: Theoretical, clinical, and research implications. In A. O. Horvath & L. S. Greenberg (Eds.), The working alliance: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 173–195). Oxford, UK: Wiley.
Rostosky, S. S., Riggle, E. D., Gray, B. E., & Hatton, R. L. (2007). Minority stress experiences in committed same-sex couple relationships. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 38, 392.
Scheinkman, M., & Fishbane, M. D. (2004). The vulnerability cycle: Working with impasses in couple therapy. Family Process, 43(3), 279–299. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.2004.00023.x.
Sprenkle, D. H., Davis, S. D., & Lebow, J. L. (2009). Common factors in couple and family therapy: The overlooked foundation for effective practice. New York: Guilford Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Drinane, J.M., Strokoff, J. (2018). Oppression in Couple and Family Therapy. In: Lebow, J., Chambers, A., Breunlin, D. (eds) Encyclopedia of Couple and Family Therapy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15877-8_904-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15877-8_904-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-15877-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-15877-8
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences