Definition
Peace formation on the Pacific island of Bougainville after a protracted internal violent conflict has been a remarkable success story. In this entry it will be argued that this success is due to constructive interactions between international and national formal institutions and actors on the one hand and local informal institutions and actors from the sphere of civil society and customary governance on the other. While the first pursue a conventional liberal agenda of peacebuilding, the latter introduce their indigenous ways of conflict transformation, peace formation, and forming political community into the process. Externally driven peacebuilding is thus only one aspect of much broader and deeper peace formation. In the course of local-liberal interaction, hybrid forms of peace emerge that differ considerably from Western concepts of peace but at the same time can become more efficient and legitimate in maintaining peace and order. After two decades of peace formation,...
References
Adams, R. (Ed.). (2001). Peace on Bougainville – Truce monitoring group. Gudpela Nius Bilong peace. Wellington: Victoria University Press.
Australian Government – Australian Civil-Military Centre. (2012). Partnering for peace. Australia’s peacekeeping and peacebuilding experiences in the autonomous region of Bougainville in Papua New Guinea, and in Solomon Islands and Timor-Leste. Canberra: Australian Government.
Boege, V. (2012). Hybrid forms of peace and order on a South Sea Island: Experiences from Bougainville (Papua New Guinea). In O. Richmond & A. Mitchell (Eds.), Hybrid forms of peace: From everyday agency to post-liberalism (pp. 88–106). Houndmills/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Boege, V. (2019). The rambutan, the chopper and the broken spear: Peacebuilding on Bougainville as a cross-cultural exchange. Peacebuilding, 7(1), 1–19.
Boege, V., & Garasu, L. (2011). Bougainville: A source of inspiration for conflict resolution. In M. Brigg & R. Bleiker (Eds.), Mediating across difference. Oceanic and Asian approaches to conflict resolution (pp. 163–182). Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.
Boege, V., Brown, A., Clements, K., & Nolan, A. (2009). On hybrid political orders and emerging states: What is failing – States in the global South or research and politics in the West? Berghof handbook dialogue series no. 8 (pp. 15–35). Berlin: Berghof Research Center for Constructive Conflict Management.
Bougainville Peace Agreement. (2001). In: A. Carl & L. Garasu (Eds.), Weaving consensus – The Papua New Guinea – Bougainville peace process (Conciliation Resources Accord Issue 12/2002) (pp. 67–85). London: Conciliation Resources.
Braithwaite, J. (2011). Partial truth and reconciliation in the long duree. Contemporary Social Science, 6(1), 129–146.
Braithwaite, J., et al. (2010). Reconciliation and architectures of commitment. Sequencing peace in Bougainville. Canberra: ANU ePress.
Breen, B. (2016). The good neighbour: Australian peace support operations in the Pacific Islands, 1980–2006. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brigg, M. (2014). Culture, ‘relationality’, and global cooperation. Global cooperation research papers 6. Duisburg: Centre for Global Cooperation Research.
Brigg, M. (2016). Relational peacebuilding. Promise beyond crisis. In T. Debiel, T. Held, & U. Schneckener (Eds.), Peacebuilding in crisis. Rethinking paradigms and practices of transnational cooperation (pp. 56–690). London/New York: Routledge.
Carl, A., & Garasu, L. (Eds.). (2002). Weaving consensus. The Papua New Guinea – Bougainville peace process (Accord issue 12). London: Conciliation Resources.
Havini, M. T., & Tankunani Sirivi, J. (Eds.). (2004). … as mothers of the land. The birth of the Bougainville women for peace and freedom. Canberra: Pandanus Books.
Howley, P. (2002). Breaking spears and mending hearts. Peacemakers and restorative justice in Bougainville. London/Annandale: Zed Books/The Federation Press.
Keesing, R. M. (1993). Kastom re-examined. Anthropological Forum, 6(4), 587–596.
Krogstad, E. G. (2014). Local ownership as dependence management: Inviting the Coloniser Back. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 8(2–3), 105–125.
Mac Ginty, R. (2008). Indigenous peace-making versus the liberal peace. Cooperation and Conflict, 43(2), 139–163.
Mac Ginty, R. (2011). International peacebuilding and local resistance. Hybrid forms of peace. Hampshire/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Mac Ginty, R. (2015). Where is the local? Critical localism and peacebuilding. Third World Quarterly, 36(5), 840–856.
Mac Ginty, R. (2016). What do we mean when we use the term ‘local’? Imagining and framing the local and the international in relation to peace and order. In T. Debiel, T. Held, & U. Schneckener (Eds.), Peacebuilding in crisis. Rethinking paradigms and practices of transnational cooperation (pp. 193–209). London/New York: Routledge.
Mac Ginty, R., & Richmond, O. P. (2013). The local turn in peace building: A critical agenda for peace. Third World Quarterly, 34(5), 763–783.
Mac Ginty, R., & Richmond, O. P. (2015). The fallacy of constructing hybrid political orders: A reappraisal of the hybrid turn in peacebuilding. International Peacekeeping, 23(2), 219–239.
McLeod, L. (2015). A feminist approach to hybridity: Understanding local and international interactions in producing post-conflict gender security. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 9(1), 48–69.
Regan, A. J. (2000). ‘Traditional’ leaders and conflict resolution in Bougainville: Reforming the present by re-writing the past? In S. Dinnen & A. Ley (Eds.), Reflections on violence in Melanesia (pp. 290–304). Annandale/Canberra: Hawkins Press & Asia Pacific Press.
Regan, A. J. (2008). The Bougainville intervention: Political legitimacy and sustainable peace-building. In G. Fry & T. T. Kabutaulaka (Eds.), Intervention and state-building in the Pacific. The legitimacy of ‘cooperative intervention (pp. 184–208). Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Regan, A. J. (2010). Light intervention. Lessons from Bougainville. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace.
Regan, A. J., & Griffin, H. M. (Eds.). (2005). Bougainville before the conflict. Canberra: Pandanus Books.
Richmond, O. P. (2009a). A post-liberal peace: Eirenism and the everyday. Review of International Studies, 35, 557–580.
Richmond, O. P. (2009b). The romanticisation of the local: Welfare, culture and peacebuilding. The International Spectator, 44(1), 149–169.
Richmond, O. P. (2011). A post-liberal peace. London/New York: Routledge.
Richmond, O. P. (2016). Peace formation and political order in conflict affected societies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Richmond, O. P. (2019). Peace and the formation of political order. International Peacekeeping, 26(1), 85–110.
Richmond, O. P., & Mac Ginty, R. (2014). Where now for the critique of the liberal peace? Cooperation and Conflict, 50(2), 171–189.
Richmond, O. P., & Mitchell, A. (Eds.). (2012). Hybrid forms of peace: From everyday agency to post-liberalism. Houndmills/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Tanis, J. (2002). Reconciliation: My side of the island. In A. Carl & L. Garasu (Eds.), Weaving consensus – The Papua New Guinea – Bougainville peace process (Conciliation resources accord issue 12/2002) (pp. 58–61). London: Conciliation Resources.
UNDP. (2014). Peace and development analysis. Findings and Emerging Priorities. Port Moresby: United Nations Development Programme Papua New Guinea Country Office.
Wallis, J. (2014). Constitution making during state building. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Wehner, M., & Denoon, D. (Eds.). (2001). Without a gun. Australians’ experiences monitoring peace in Bougainville, 1997–2001. Canberra: Pandanus Books.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Boege, V. (2020). Peace Formation in Bougainville. In: The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Peace and Conflict Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11795-5_71-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11795-5_71-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-11795-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-11795-5
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Political Science and International StudiesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences