Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Second Handbook of English Language Teaching pp 643–660Cite as

Language Learner Engagement: Setting the Scene

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Springer International Handbooks of Education ((SIHE))

Abstract

Engagement is the key to successful language learning. It describes the dynamic state when learners are actively thinking about, focusing on, and enjoying their language learning. In order to be willing and ready to engage, learners need to be in the right frame of mind to do so. To better understand what the key motivational antecedents for engagement are, this chapter draws on insights from self-determination theory (SDT). This theory suggests that we all have needs that must be met in order for us to feel willing to engage with learning opportunities – we need to feel a sense of competence, autonomy, and relatedness. For example, this means a learner needs to believe they can successfully manage the learning that is of value to them, that they have some choice and influence over what they do and how they do it, and that this can all be done within a supportive, low-anxiety community of peers and teacher. In this chapter, I describe what engagement is and why I think it is so important to understand for language education specifically. I reflect on the nature of the motivational antecedents and how we can best promote them as language educators. The chapter concludes with considerations for a holistic model of language learner engagement which would bring together the motivational antecedents within an ecological perspective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   449.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   649.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Akbari E, Naderi A, Simons R-J, Pilot A (2016) Student engagement and foreign language learning through online social networks. Asia-Pac J Second Foreign Lang Educ 1:4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Assor A, Kaplan H, Roth G (2002) Choice is good but relevance is excellent: autonomy-enhancing and suppressing teacher behaviours predicting students’ engagement in schoolwork. Br J Educ Psychol 72:261–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aubrey S (2017) Measuring flow in the EFL classroom: learners’ perceptions of inter- and intra-cultural task-based interactions. TESOL Q 51(3):661–692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura A (1986) The explanatory and predictive scope of self-efficacy theory. J Soc Clin Psychol 4(3):359–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura A (1997) Self-efficacy. W. H. Freeman, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Baralt M, Gurzynski-Weiss L, Kim Y (2016) Engagement with the language: how examining learners’ affective and social engagement explains successful learner-generated attention to form. In: Sato M, Ballinger S (eds) Peer interaction and second language learning: pedagogical potential and research agenda. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp 209–239

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Batstone R (2002) Contexts of engagement: a discourse perspective on ‘intake’ and ‘pushed output’. System 30:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister RF, Leary MR (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin 117(3):497–529

    Google Scholar 

  • Boo Z, Dörnyei Z, Ryan S (2015) L2 motivation research 2005–2014: understanding a publication surge and a changing landscape. System 55:145–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christenson SL, Reschly AL, Wylie C (eds) (2012) Handbook of research on student engagement. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi M (2003) Flow: the classic work on how to achieve happiness. Rider, London

    Google Scholar 

  • De Castella K, Byrne D (2015) My intelligence may be more malleable than yours: the revised implicit theories of intelligence (self-theory) scale is a better predictor of achievement, motivation, and student disengagement. Eur J Psychol Educ 30(3):245–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deci EL, Schwartz AJ, Sheinman L, Ryan RM (1981) An instrument to assess adults’ orientations toward control versus autonomy with children: reflections on intrinsic motivation and perceived competence. J Educ Psychol 73(5):642–650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denton P (2007) The power of our words: teacher language that helps children learn. Northeast Foundation for Children, Turners Falls

    Google Scholar 

  • Dörnyei Z, Murphey T (2003) Group dynamics in the language classroom. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dörnyei Z, Ibrahim Z, Muir C (2015) Directed motivational currents: regulating complex dynamic systems through motivational surges. In: Dörnyei Z, MacIntyre P, Henry A (eds) Motivational dynamics in language learning. Multilingual Matters, Bristol, pp 95–105

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dörnyei Z, Henry A, Muir C (2016) Motivational currents in language learning. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Dupreyrat C, Mariné C (2005) Implicit theories of intelligence, goal orientation, cognitive engagement, and achievement: a test of Dweck’s model with returning to school adults. Contemp Educ Psychol 30(1):43–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dweck CS (2006) Mindset: the new psychology of success. Random House, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dweck CS (2007) The perils and promises of praise. Educ Leadersh 65(2):34–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Dweck CS, Chiu C, Hong Y (1995) Implicit theories and their role in judgements and reactions: a world from two perspectives. Psychol Inq 6(4):267–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eccles J, Wigfield A (1995) In the mind of the actor: the structure of adolescents’ achievement task values and expectancy-related beliefs. Personal Soc Psychol Bull 21:215–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eccles J, Wigfield A (2002) Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annu Rev Psychol 53:109–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edstrom A (2015) Triads in the L2 classroom: interaction patterns and engagement during a collaborative task. System 52:26–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Floyd KS, Harrington SJ, Santiago J (2009) The effect of engagement and perceived course value on deep and surface learning strategies. Inf Sci 12:181–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Fredricks JA (2014) Eight myths of student disengagement. Corwin, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Fredricks JA, Blumenfeld PC, Paris AH (2004) School engagement: potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Rev Educ Res 74(1):59–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furrer CJ, Skinner EA (2003) Sense of relatedness as a factor in children’s academic engagement and performance. J Educ Psychol 95(1):148–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furrer CJ, Skinner EA, Pitzer JR (2014) The influence of teacher and peer relationships on students’ classroom engagement and everyday motivational resilience. Natl Soc Study Educ 113(1): 101–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Gkonou C, Mercer S (2017) Understanding emotional and social intelligence among English language teachers. British Council, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Green J, Liem GAD, Martin AJ, Colmar S, Marsh HW, McInerney D (2012) Academic motivation, self-concept, engagement, and performance in high school: key processes from a longitudinal perspective. J Adolesc 35:1111–1122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han Y (2017) Mediating and being mediated: learner beliefs and learner engagement with written corrective feedback. System 69:133–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harbour KE, Evanovich LL, Sweigart CA, Hughes LE (2015) A brief review of effective teaching practices that maximize student engagement. Prev Sch Fail 59(1):5–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henry A, Davydenko S, Dörnyei Z (2015) The anatomy of directed motivational currents: exploring intense and enduring periods of L2 motivation. Mod Lang J 99(2):329–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyland F (2003) Focusing on form: student engagement with teacher feedback. System 31:217–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jang HK, Kim EJ, Reeve J (2012) Longitudinal test of self-determination theory’s motivation mediation model in a naturally occurring classroom context. J Educ Psychol 104(4):1175–1188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawson MA, Lawson HA (2013) New conceptual frameworks for student engagement research, policy, and practice. Rev Educ Res 83(3):432–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linnenbrink EA, Pintrich PR (2003) The role of self-efficacy beliefs in student engagement and learning in the classroom. Read Writ Q 19(2):119–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lo J, Hyland F (2007) Enhancing students’ engagement and motivation with writing: the case of primary students in Hong Kong. J Second Lang Writ 16:219–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macklem GL (2015) Boredom in the classroom: addressing student motivation, self-regulation, and engagement in learning. Springer, Dordrecht

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh HW (2006) Self-concept theory, measurement and research into practice: the role of self-concept in educational psychology, 26th Vernon-Wall Lecture. British Psychological Society, Leicester

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh HW, Byrne BM, Shavelson RJ (1988) A multifaceted academic self-concept: its hierarchical structure and its relation to academic achievement. J Educ Psychol 80(3):366–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mercer S (2011) Towards an understanding of language learner self-concept. Springer, Dordrecht

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mercer S (2015) Learner agency and engagement: believing you can, wanting to and knowing how to. Humanising Lang Teach 17(4):1–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercer S, Dörnyei Z (in preparation) Engaging language learners in the age of digital distraction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercer S, Ryan S (2010) A mindset for EFL: learners’ beliefs about the role of natural talent. ELT J 64(4):436–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muir C, Dörnyei Z (2013) Directed motivational currents: using vision to create effective motivational pathways. Stud Second Lang Learn Teach 3(3):357–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray G (ed) (2014) Social dimensions of autonomy in language learning. Palgrave, Basingstoke

    Google Scholar 

  • Nystrand M, Gamoran A (1991) Instructional discourse, student engagement, and literature achievement. Res Teach Engl 25(3):261–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Pajares F, Miller MD (1994) Role of self-efficacy and self-concept beliefs in mathematical problem solving: a path analysis. J Educ Psychol 86(2):193–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pajares F, Schunk DH (2005) Self-efficacy and self-concept beliefs. In: Marsh HW, Craven RG, McInerney DM (eds) International advances in self research, vol 2. Information Age Publishing, Greenwich, pp 95–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Pekrun R, Goetz T, Daniels LM, Stupnisky RH, Perry RP (2010) Boredom in achievement settings: exploring control–value antecedents and performance outcomes of a neglected emotion. J Educ Psychol 102(3):531–549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Philp J, Duchesne S (2016) Exploring engagement in tasks in the language classroom. Annu Rev Appl Linguist 36:50–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phung L (2017) Task preference, affective response, and engagement in L2 use in a US university context. Lang Teach Res 21(6):751–766

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich PR, Schunk DH (2002) Motivation in education: theory, research, and applications. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Platt E, Brooks FB (2002) Task engagement: a turning point in foreign language development. Lang Learn 52(2):365–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quint Oga-Baldwin WL, Nakata Y (2017) Engagement, gender and motivation: a predictive model for Japanese young language learners. System 65:151–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reeve J (2006) Teachers as facilitators: what autonomy-supportive teachers do and why their students benefit. Elem Sch J 106(3):225–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reeve J (2012) A self-determination theory perspective on student engagement. In: Christenson SL, Reschly AL, Wylie C (eds) Handbook of research on student engagement. Springer, New York, pp 149–172

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Reeve J, Tseng C-M (2011) Agency as a fourth aspect of students’ engagement during learning activities. Contemp Educ Psychol 36(4):257–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reschly AL, Christenson SL (2012) Jingle, jangle, and conceptual haziness: evolution and future directions of the engagement construct. In: Christenson SL, Reschly AL, Wylie C (eds) Handbook of research on student engagement. Springer, New York, pp 3–19

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Russell VJ, Ainley M, Frydenberg E (2005) Student motivation and engagement. In: Schooling issues digest. From: http://pandora.nla.gov.au/pan/26080/20051107-0000/www.dest.gov.au/sectors/school_education/publications_resources/schooling_issues_digest/schooling_issues_digest_motivation_engagement.htm. Accessed 23 Dec 2017

  • Ryan R, Deci EL (2000) Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development and well-being. Am Psychol 55(1):68–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan R, Deci EL (2017) Self-determination theory. Guildford Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Schunk DH, Mullen CA (2012) Self-efficacy as an engaged learner. In: Christenson SL, Reschly AL, Wylie C (eds) Handbook of research on student engagement. Springer, New York, pp 219–235

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schunk DH, Pajares F (2009) Self-efficacy theory. In: Wentzerl KR, Wigfield A (eds) Handbook of motivation at school. Routledge, London, pp 35–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Shernoff DJ (2013) Optimal learning environments to promote student engagement. Springer, Dordrecht

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shernoff DJ, Csikszentmihalyi M, Schneider B, Shernoff ES (2014) Student engagement in high school classrooms from the perspective of flow theory. In: Applications of flow in human development and education. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 475–494

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sinatra GM, Heddy BC, Lombardi D (2015) The challenges of defining and measuring student engagement in science. Educ Psychol 50(1):1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner EA, Kindermann TA, Connell JP, Wellborn JG (2009) Engagement and disaffection as organizational constructs in the dynamics of motivational development. In: Wentzerl KR, Wigfield A (eds) Handbook of motivation at school. Routledge, London, pp 223–245

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder B, Alperer-Tatli S (2007) Classroom practice: Learner engagement. In J. Egbert & E. Hanson-Smith (Eds.), CALL Environments, 2nd Ed. (pp. 349–361). Alexandria, VA: TESOL

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg L, Brown BB, Dornbusch SM (1996) Beyond the classroom: why school reform has failed and what parents need to do. Simon and Schuster, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Stroud R (2017) The impact of task performance scoring and tacking on second language engagement. System 69:121–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svalberg AM-L (2009) Engagement with language: interrogating a construct. Lang Aware 18(3–4): 242–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svalberg AM-L (2018) Researching language engagement; current trends and future directions, Language Awareness, 27:(1–2), 21–39, https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2017.1406490

  • Taguchi T, Magid M, Papi M (2009) The L2 motivational self system among Japanese, Chinese and Iranian learners of English: a comparative study. In: Dörnyei Z, Ushioda E (eds) Motivation, language identity and the L2 self. Multilingual Matters, Bristol, pp 66–97

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Trowler V (2010) Student engagement literature review. Lancaster University, Lancaster

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Graz, Graz, Austria

    Sarah Mercer

Authors
  1. Sarah Mercer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarah Mercer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia

    Xuesong Gao

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Mercer, S. (2019). Language Learner Engagement: Setting the Scene. In: Gao, X. (eds) Second Handbook of English Language Teaching. Springer International Handbooks of Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02899-2_40

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation